| Literature DB >> 29194350 |
M Barra1,2, A Llanos-Rivera3, F Cruzat4,5,6, N Pino-Maureira7,8,9, R R González-Saldía10,11,12.
Abstract
Fish oil is used in the production of feed for cultured fish owing to its high polyunsaturated fatty acid content (PUFA). The over-exploitation of fisheries and events like "El Niño" are reducing the fish oil supply. Some marine microorganisms are considered potentially as alternative fatty acid sources. This study assesses a strain of Rhodotorula sp. (strain CNYC4007; 27% docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) of total fatty acids), as feed for fish larvae. The total length and ribonucleic acid (RNA)/deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ratio of Danio rerio larvae was determined at first feeding at six and 12 days old (post-yolk absorption larvae). Larvae fed with microencapsulated Rhodotorula sp. CNYC4007 had a significantly higher RNA/DNA ratio than control group (C1). At six days post-yolk absorption group, the RNA/DNA ratio of larvae fed with Rhodotorula sp. bioencapsulated in Brachionus sp. was significantly higher than control group fed with a commercial diet high in DHA (C2-DHA). Finally, at 12 days post-yolk absorption, the RNA/DNA ratio was significantly higher in larvae fed with Rhodotorula sp. CNYC4007 and C2-DHA (both bioencapsulated in Artemia sp. nauplii) than in control group (C1). These results suggest that Rhodotorula sp. CNYC4007 can be an alternative source of DHA for feeding fish at larval stage, providing a sustainable source of fatty acids.Entities:
Keywords: DHA; Danio rerio; EPA; RNA/DNA ratio; Rhodotorula; larvae nutrition
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29194350 PMCID: PMC5742829 DOI: 10.3390/md15120369
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1Average nucleic acid content (ng) versus larvae age of Danio rerio fed with standard feed compared to treatment with larvae in starvation. Each point represents the average of four larvae per treatment. * p < 0.05.
Figure 2Ribonucleic acid (RNA)/deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) ratio versus test of larvae of Danio rerio fed with standard feed compared to that of larvae in starvation. The daily average is based on four larvae per treatment. * p < 0.05.
Figure 3Total length versus larvae age of Danio rerio at first feeding larvae. The daily average is based on six larvae per treatment. * p < 0.05.
Figure 4RNA/DNA ratio versus larvae age of Danio rerio at first feeding larvae. The daily average daily is based on six larvae per treatment. * p < 0.05.
Total larval length (average ± SD) for assay with six-day-old larvae of Danio rerio after post-yolk absorption. Larvae were fed with bioencapsulated Brachionus sp. rotifers and Artemia sp. nauplii. The daily average is based on six larvae per treatment. C1: without enrichment; C2-DHA: feed rich in docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) treatment; CNYC4007: Rhodotorula sp. CNYC4007 treatment.
| Larvae Age (Days) | Total Length Larvae (mm) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | C2-DHA | CNYC4007 | C1 | C2-DHA | CNYC4007 | |
| 6 | 5.0 ± 0.2 | 5.0 ± 0.2 | 5.0 ± 0.2 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 8 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 5.5 ± 0.4 | 5.1 ± 0.2 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 10 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 12 | 5.6 ± 0.1 | 5.7 ± 0.2 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 5.6 ± 0.3 |
| 14 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 5.6 ± 0.3 | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 5.8 ± 0.4 |
| 16 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 5.6 ± 0.2 | 6.0 ± 0.3 | 6.0 ± 0.4 |
| 18 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 6.6 ± 0.1 | 6.9 ± 0.3 | 7.0 ± 0.3 |
| 20 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 9.5 ± 0.4 | 10.2 ± 0.3 | 10.1 ± 0.7 |
| 22 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 9.9 ± 0.8 | 10.6 ± 0.3 | 10.6 ± 0.5 |
RNA/DNA ratio for assay with six-day-old larvae of Danio rerio after post-yolk absorption. Larvae were fed with bioencapsulated Brachionus sp. rotifers and Artemia sp. nauplii. The daily average is based on six larvae per treatment. C1: without enrichment; C2-DHA: feed rich in DHA treatment; CNYC4007: Rhodotorula sp. CNYC4007 treatment.
| Larvae Age (Days) | RNA/DNA Ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | C2-DHA | CNYC4007 | C1 | C2-DHA | CNYC4007 | |
| 6 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 8 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 1.4 ± 0.3 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 10 | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 1.5 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.3 | n/a | n/a | n/a |
| 12 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | |||
| 14 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.3 |
| 16 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 1.0 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.3 |
| 18 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 1.0 ± 0.2 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.2 |
| 20 | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 |
| 22 | n/a | n/a | n/a | |||
* = p-value < 0.05; n/a = not available.
Figure 5Average DHA and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) concentrations (± S.D.) in Artemia sp. nauplii without enrichment (C1), fed feed rich in DHA (C2-DHA) and fed with the strain Rhodotorula sp. CNYC4007. * p-value < 0.05.
Proximate composition of the diets used as a control (C1), positive control (C2-DHA) and the strain Rhodotorula sp. CNYC4007.
| Components (%) | C1 | C2-DHA | CNYC4007 Microencapsulated | CNYC4007 Meal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protein | 49 | 17.6 | n/a | n/a |
| Carbohydrate | n/a | 15.9 | 92.5 | 36.0 |
| Fat | 8.5 | 56.2 | 0.3 | 7.6 |
| Nitrogen compounds | n/a | n/a | 1.4 | 6.1 |
| Fiber | 3 | n/a | 1.2 | 1.7 |
| Moisture | 6 | 2.1 | 3.7 | 83.1 |
| Ash | n/a | 8.2 | 0.5 | 7.6 |
| Calories (kcal) | n/a | 640 | 378.2 | 169.8 |
n/a = not available.