Catherine Slota, Scott A Davis1, Susan J Blalock1, Delesha M Carpenter1, Kelly W Muir2,3, Alan L Robin4,5,6, Betsy Sleath1. 1. Division of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, North Carolina. 2. Department of Ophthalmology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. 3. Health Services Research & Development, Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. 4. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. 6. Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, and Department of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland *cgutpta@rti.org.
Abstract
SIGNIFICANCE: This article is the first to investigate the nature of medication cost discussions between ophthalmologists and glaucoma patients. Only 87 of the 275 office visits analyzed had a discussion of medication cost. Providers should consider discussing medication cost with patients to identify potential cost-related barriers to medication use. PURPOSE: Glaucoma is an incurable chronic eye disease affecting a growing portion of the aging population. Some of the most commonly utilized treatments require lifelong use, requiring high patient adherence to ensure effectiveness. There are numerous barriers to glaucoma treatment adherence in the literature, including cost. The aim of this secondary analysis was to describe the frequency and nature of patient-physician communication regarding medication cost during glaucoma office visits. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods secondary analysis of video-recorded participant office visits (n = 275) from a larger observational study of glaucoma communication. We analyzed medical information, demographic characteristics, and interviewer-administrated questionnaires, as well as verbatim transcripts of interviews. RESULTS: Only 87 participants discussed medication cost during their glaucoma office visit. The majority of the subjects who discussed cost had mild disease severity (51%), took one glaucoma medication (63%), and had Medicare (49%) as well as a form of prescription insurance (78%). The majority of glaucoma office visits did not discuss medication cost, and providers often did not ask about cost problems. Of the few conversations related to cost, most focused on providers offering potential solutions (n = 50), medical and prescription service coverage (n = 41), and brand or generic medication choices (n = 41). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are similar to previous studies showing few patients have conversations with providers about the cost of glaucoma medications. Providers should consider bringing up medication cost during glaucoma office visits to prompt a discussion of potential cost-related barriers to medication use.
SIGNIFICANCE: This article is the first to investigate the nature of medication cost discussions between ophthalmologists and glaucomapatients. Only 87 of the 275 office visits analyzed had a discussion of medication cost. Providers should consider discussing medication cost with patients to identify potential cost-related barriers to medication use. PURPOSE:Glaucoma is an incurable chronic eye disease affecting a growing portion of the aging population. Some of the most commonly utilized treatments require lifelong use, requiring high patient adherence to ensure effectiveness. There are numerous barriers to glaucoma treatment adherence in the literature, including cost. The aim of this secondary analysis was to describe the frequency and nature of patient-physician communication regarding medication cost during glaucoma office visits. METHODS: This was a mixed-methods secondary analysis of video-recorded participant office visits (n = 275) from a larger observational study of glaucoma communication. We analyzed medical information, demographic characteristics, and interviewer-administrated questionnaires, as well as verbatim transcripts of interviews. RESULTS: Only 87 participants discussed medication cost during their glaucoma office visit. The majority of the subjects who discussed cost had mild disease severity (51%), took one glaucoma medication (63%), and had Medicare (49%) as well as a form of prescription insurance (78%). The majority of glaucoma office visits did not discuss medication cost, and providers often did not ask about cost problems. Of the few conversations related to cost, most focused on providers offering potential solutions (n = 50), medical and prescription service coverage (n = 41), and brand or generic medication choices (n = 41). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are similar to previous studies showing few patients have conversations with providers about the cost of glaucoma medications. Providers should consider bringing up medication cost during glaucoma office visits to prompt a discussion of potential cost-related barriers to medication use.
Authors: Betsy Sleath; Alan L Robin; David Covert; John E Byrd; Gail Tudor; Bonnie Svarstad Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2006-02-03 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Betsy Sleath; Susan J Blalock; Delesha M Carpenter; Robyn Sayner; Kelly W Muir; Catherine Slota; Scott D Lawrence; Annette L Giangiacomo; Mary Elizabeth Hartnett; Gail Tudor; Jason A Goldsmith; Alan L Robin Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Beth L Nordstrom; David S Friedman; Essy Mozaffari; Harry A Quigley; Alexander M Walker Journal: Am J Ophthalmol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 5.258
Authors: Julie A Schmittdiel; Neil Steers; O Kenrik Duru; Susan L Ettner; Arleen F Brown; Vicki Fung; John Hsu; Elaine Quiter; Chien-Wen Tseng; Carol M Mangione Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2010-06-14 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: David S Friedman; Steven R Hahn; Laurie Gelb; Jason Tan; Sonali N Shah; Elizabeth E Kim; Thom J Zimmerman; Harry A Quigley Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2008-03-05 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Eva K Fenwick; Ana M Roldan; Omar A Halawa; Ryan S Meshkin; Nazlee Zebardast; Vesselin Popov; Przemyslaw Lis; David S Friedman; Ecosse L Lamoureux Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 3.283