Literature DB >> 29194051

Blood, tissue and imaging biomarkers in calcific aortic valve stenosis: past, present and future.

Mylène Shen1, Lionel Tastet1, Jutta Bergler-Klein2, Philippe Pibarot1, Marie-Annick Clavel1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Calcific aortic valve stenosis is the most prevalent valvular heart disease in the high-income countries. To this date, no medical therapy has been proven to prevent or to stop the progression of aortic valve stenosis. The physiopathology of aortic valve stenosis is highly complex and involves several signalling pathways, as well as genetic related factors, which delay the elaboration of effective pharmacotherapies. Moreover, it is difficult to predict accurately the progression of the valve stenosis and finding the optimal timing for aortic valve replacement remains challenging. Therefore, the present review makes an inventory of the most recent and promising circulating and imaging biomarkers related to the underlying mechanisms involved in the physiopathology of aortic valve stenosis, as well as the biomarkers associated with the left ventricular (LV) remodelling and subsequent dysfunction in patients with aortic valve stenosis. RECENT
FINDINGS: Over the last decade, several blood, tissue and imaging biomarkers have been investigated in aortic valve stenosis patients. At the aortic valve level, these biomarkers are mostly associated and/or involved with processes such as lipid infiltration and oxidation, chronic inflammation and fibrocalcific remodelling of the valve. Moreover, recent findings suggest that aging and sex hormones might interact with these multiple processes. Several studies demonstrated the usefulness of circulating biomarkers such as lipoprotein(a), brain natriuretic peptides and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin, which are very close to clinical routine. Furthermore, noninvasive imaging biomarkers including positron emission tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance, which provide a detailed view of the disease activity within the aortic valve and its repercussion on the left ventricle, may help to improve the understanding of aortic valve stenosis physiopathology and enhance the risk stratification. Other biomarkers such as von Willebrand factor and microRNAs are promising but further studies are needed to prove their additive value in aortic valve stenosis.
SUMMARY: Most of the biomarkers are used in research and thus, are still being investigated. However, some biomarkers including plasma level of lipoprotein(a), F-sodium fluoride, brain natriuretic peptides and high-sensitivity cardiac troponin can be or are very close to be used for the clinical management of patients with aortic valve stenosis. Moreover, a multibiomarker approach might provide a more global view of the disease activity and improve the management strategies of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29194051     DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000487

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Cardiol        ISSN: 0268-4705            Impact factor:   2.161


  9 in total

Review 1.  Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease.

Authors:  Xiaochun Ma; Diming Zhao; Peidong Yuan; Jinzhang Li; Yan Yun; Yuqi Cui; Tao Zhang; Jiwei Ma; Liangong Sun; Huibo Ma; Yuman Zhang; Haizhou Zhang; Wenlong Zhang; Junjie Huang; Chengwei Zou; Zhengjun Wang
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 2.672

2.  Interleukin 38 alleviates aortic valve calcification by inhibition of NLRP3.

Authors:  Erlinda The; Dennis M de Graaf; Yufeng Zhai; Qingzhou Yao; Lihua Ao; David A Fullerton; Charles A Dinarello; Xianzhong Meng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 12.779

3.  Biomarkers Associated With Aortic Valve Calcification: Should We Focus on Sex Specific Processes?

Authors:  Frederique E C M Peeters; Elton A M P Dudink; Bob Weijs; Larissa Fabritz; Winnie Chua; Bas L J H Kietselaer; Joachim E Wildberger; Steven J R Meex; Paulus Kirchhof; Harry J G M Crijns; Leon J Schurgers
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-07-10

4.  Biological variation of cardiac markers in patients with aortic valve stenosis.

Authors:  Frederique E C M Peeters; Bas L J H Kietselaer; Judith Hilderink; Noreen van der Linden; Marijke Niens; Harry J G M Crijns; Steven J R Meex
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2019-05-08

5.  Editorial: From Biology to Clinical Management: An Update on Aortic Valve Disease.

Authors:  Cécile Oury; Alain Nchimi; Patrizio Lancellotti
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2019-01-23

6.  MicroRNA and Cardiovascular Diseases

Authors:  Hüseyin Altuğ Çakmak; Mehmet Demir
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 2.021

7.  Impact of sex and sex hormones on pathophysiology and progression of aortic stenosis in a murine model.

Authors:  Marie-Ange Fleury; Mohamed-Salah Annabi; Martine Voisine; Maxime Hervault; Anne-Julie Boilard; Mylène Shen; André Marette; Nancy Côté; Marie-Annick Clavel
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2022-08

8.  Can Blood Biomarkers Help Predicting Outcome in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation?

Authors:  Cécile Oury; Alain Nchimi; Patrizio Lancellotti; Jutta Bergler-Klein
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-03-28

9.  Serum Biomarkers of Cardiovascular Remodelling Reflect Extra-Valvular Cardiac Damage in Patients with Severe Aortic Stenosis.

Authors:  Laura Bäz; Gudrun Dannberg; Katja Grün; Julian Westphal; Sven Möbius-Winkler; Christian Jung; Alexander Pfeil; P Christian Schulze; Marcus Franz
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.