Literature DB >> 29193786

Preferential atrophy of the central retinal ganglion cells in homonymous hemianopia due to acquired retrogeniculate lesions demonstrated using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Tsutomu Yamashita1,2, Atsushi Miki1,2, Katsutoshi Goto2, Syunsuke Araki2, Go Takizawa2, Yoshiaki Ieki2, Junichi Kiryu2, Akio Tabuchi1, Yasuyuki Iguchi3, Kazumi Kimura4, Yoshiki Yagita5.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29193786      PMCID: PMC6099321          DOI: 10.1111/aos.13644

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1755-375X            Impact factor:   3.761


× No keyword cloud information.
Editor, Optical coherence tomography (OCT) studies of acquired occipital lobe lesions in humans have demonstrated corresponding inner retinal thinning with the use of time‐domain OCT (TD‐OCT) (Jindahra et al. 2009), and later, with the use of spectral domain OCT (SD‐OCT) (Yamashita et al. 2012). In the present study, we analysed the whole macular area in eyes with homonymous hemianopia by high‐penetration swept‐source OCT (SS‐OCT; DRI OCT‐1 Atlantis, Topcon, Tokyo, Japan) and produced maps of the three macular inner retinal layer thicknesses (μm): (i) the macular retinal nerve fibre layer (mRNFL), (ii) the ganglion cell layer and inner plexiform layer (GCL + IPL) and (iii) the ganglion cell complex (GCC; mRNFL + GCL + IPL) thicknesses. The software program calculates the average retinal thickness of the mRNFL, GCL + IPL, GCC and the total for each 2 × 1.5 mm grid square of the 12 × 9 mm scan area. The macular retinal thickness parameters (centred on the macula) were divided vertically into the hemianopic and unaffected sides, and the averaged data between the two eyes were used for further quantitative analyses. We examined 19 patients [male, n = 9; female, n = 10; age, 38–78 years (mean 60.5 years)] with unilateral retrogeniculate lesions and 56 age‐matched normal control subjects [male, n = 30; female, n = 26; age, 20–82 years (mean, 56.2 years)]. The time between the SS‐OCT measurement and the onset of brain lesions ranged from 1 month to 8.0 years (mean, 3.2 years). The age, sex and refraction values of the patients and the normal control subjects did not differ to a statistically significant extent (p = 0.3834, 0.7913 and 0.8657, respectively; age and refraction: unpaired Mann–Whitney U‐test; sex: chi‐squared test). In the eyes with homonymous hemianopia, each of these thicknesses of the hemianopic side was significantly thinner in comparison to normal eyes (Table 1). The macular inner retinal thicknesses on the hemianopic side of the central 2 × 3 mm area were significantly thinner than those in the unaffected sides (Table 1). A regression analysis revealed a negative linear relationship (linear regression, R 2 = 0.605, p = 0.001) between the time after stroke and the GCL + IPL thickness on the hemianopic side of the central 2 × 3 mm area. The GCL + IPL and GCC thicknesses of the wide angle 6 × 9 mm area on the hemianopic side of the patients with stroke were significantly thinner than those in normal subjects and those on the unaffected side (Table 1). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of the central 2 × 3 mm area GCL + IPL and the GCC thickness for discriminating between the brain lesion group and the normal control group were significantly greater than those in the wide angle 6 × 9 mm area (Table 2).
Table 1

The macular thickness parameters in patients with homonymous hemianopia and normal controls, as measured by swept‐source optical coherence tomography (SS‐OCT) instruments (μm, Mean ± SD)

2 × 3 mm area6 × 9 mm area2 × 3 mm area6 × 9 mm area
Hemianopic side of hemianopesUnaffected side of hemianopesNormal controlsHemianopic side of hemianopesUnaffected side of hemianopesNormal controlsp valuea p valueb p valuea p valueb
mRNFL24.3 ± 6.225.8 ± 4.228.5 ± 5.341.8 ± 9.442.2 ± 9.648.6 ± 33.30.03130.00180.29540.0042
GCL + IPL63.7 ± 9.573.1 ± 7.982.8 ± 5.643.6 ± 2.745.0 ± 3.049.2 ± 15.60.00020.00010.00100.0001
GCC86.9 ± 13.799.0 ± 11.4111.4 ± 8.485.3 ± 10.087.1 ± 11.097.8 ± 32.30.00020.00010.01410.0001
Total265.5 ± 13.7273.2 ± 12.2293.0 ± 14.6222.9 ± 9.7226.2 ± 14.6240.5 ± 41.40.00100.00010.08720.0001

GCC = ganglion cell complex, GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, mRNFL = macular retinal nerve fibre layer.

Comparison of the macular thickness parameters of the hemianopic side and the unaffected side (Wilcoxon signed‐ranks test).

Comparison of the macular thickness parameters of the hemianopic side in patients with homonymous hemianopia and normal eyes (Mann–Whitney U‐test).

Table 2

The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis using the SS‐OCT‐based measurement of the macular thickness on the hemianopic side in patients with homonymous hemianopia

AUC (standard error)p valuea
2 × 3 mm area6 × 9 mm area
mRNFL0.734 (0.082)0.720 (0.073)0.8407
GCL + IPL0.981 (0.013)0.912 (0.034)0.0132
GCC0.982 (0.012)0.876 (0.049)0.0242
Total0.945 (0.024)0.902 (0.046)0.2818

GCC = ganglion cell complex, GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, mRNFL = macular retinal nerve fibre layer.

Comparison of the macular thickness on the hemianopic side in the 2 × 3 mm and 6 × 9 mm areas.

The macular thickness parameters in patients with homonymous hemianopia and normal controls, as measured by swept‐source optical coherence tomography (SS‐OCT) instruments (μm, Mean ± SD) GCC = ganglion cell complex, GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, mRNFL = macular retinal nerve fibre layer. Comparison of the macular thickness parameters of the hemianopic side and the unaffected side (Wilcoxon signed‐ranks test). Comparison of the macular thickness parameters of the hemianopic side in patients with homonymous hemianopia and normal eyes (Mann–Whitney U‐test). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis using the SS‐OCT‐based measurement of the macular thickness on the hemianopic side in patients with homonymous hemianopia GCC = ganglion cell complex, GCL = ganglion cell layer, IPL = inner plexiform layer, mRNFL = macular retinal nerve fibre layer. Comparison of the macular thickness on the hemianopic side in the 2 × 3 mm and 6 × 9 mm areas. Our results using SS‐OCT confirmed the observations of the previous studies using TD‐OCT and SD‐OCT, in that the inner retina showed statistically significant thinning corresponding to the affected visual hemifields in patients with acquired retrogeniculate damage. In addition, an area analysis revealed that the thinning predominantly occurred in the most central retina, close to the fovea. The latter finding is consistent with the results of experimental studies in primates, in which the selective loss of small ganglion cells projecting to the parvocellular layers of the lateral geniculate nucleus was observed after occipital lobe ablation (Weller et al. 1979; Cowey et al. 1989; Weller & Kaas 1989; Johnson & Cowey 2000). The similarity between animal experiments and human studies suggests that the retinal thinning of the OCT is—at least in part—due to trans‐synaptic retrograde degeneration.
  6 in total

1.  Evidence for the loss of X-cells of the retina after long-term ablation of visual cortex in monkeys.

Authors:  R E Weller; J H Kaas; A B Wetzel
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1979-01-05       Impact factor: 3.252

2.  Transneuronal retrograde degeneration of retinal ganglion cells following restricted lesions of striate cortex in the monkey.

Authors:  H Johnson; A Cowey
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Transneuronal retrograde degeneration of retinal ganglion cells after damage to striate cortex in macaque monkeys: selective loss of P beta cells.

Authors:  A Cowey; P Stoerig; V H Perry
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Reduced retinal ganglion cell complex thickness in patients with posterior cerebral artery infarction detected using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Tsutomu Yamashita; Atsushi Miki; Yasuyuki Iguchi; Kazumi Kimura; Fumiatsu Maeda; Junichi Kiryu
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  Retrograde trans-synaptic retinal ganglion cell loss identified by optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Panitha Jindahra; Aviva Petrie; Gordon T Plant
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 13.501

6.  Parameters affecting the loss of ganglion cells of the retina following ablations of striate cortex in primates.

Authors:  R E Weller; J H Kaas
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 3.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.