Michael F Pesko1, Jidong Huang2, Lloyd D Johnston3, Frank J Chaloupka4. 1. Department of Economics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 2. School of Public Health, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA. 3. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 4. Health Policy Center, Institute for Health Research and Policy, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Abstract
AIMS: We estimated associations between e-cigarette prices (both disposable and refill) and e-cigarette use among middle and high-school students in the United States. We also estimated associations between cigarette prices and e-cigarette use. DESIGN: We used regression models to estimate the associations between e-cigarette and cigarette prices and e-cigarette use. In our regression models, we exploited changes in e-cigarette and cigarette prices across four periods of time and across 50 markets. We report the associations as price elasticities. In our primary model, we controlled for socio-demographic characteristics, cigarette prices, tobacco control policies, market fixed effects and year-quarter fixed effects. SETTING: United States of America. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 24 370 middle- and high-school students participating in the Monitoring the Future Survey in years 2014 and 2015. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported e-cigarette use over the last 30 days. Average quarterly cigarette prices, e-cigarette disposable prices and e-cigarette refill prices were constructed from Nielsen retail data (inclusive of excise taxes) for 50 US markets. FINDINGS: In a model with market fixed effects, we estimated that a 10% increase in e-cigarette disposable prices is associated with a reduction in the number of days vaping among e-cigarette users by approximately 9.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) = -17.7 to 1.8%; P = 0.02] and is associated with a reduction in the number of days vaping by the full sample by approximately 17.9% (95% CI = -31.5 to -4.2%; P = 0.01). Refill e-cigarette prices were not statistically significant predictors of vaping. Cigarette prices were not associated significantly with e-cigarette use regardless of the e-cigarette price used. However, in a model without market fixed effects, cigarette prices were a statistically significant positive predictor of total e-cigarette use. CONCLUSIONS: Higher e-cigarette disposable prices appear to be associated with reduced e-cigarette use among adolescents in the US.
AIMS: We estimated associations between e-cigarette prices (both disposable and refill) and e-cigarette use among middle and high-school students in the United States. We also estimated associations between cigarette prices and e-cigarette use. DESIGN: We used regression models to estimate the associations between e-cigarette and cigarette prices and e-cigarette use. In our regression models, we exploited changes in e-cigarette and cigarette prices across four periods of time and across 50 markets. We report the associations as price elasticities. In our primary model, we controlled for socio-demographic characteristics, cigarette prices, tobacco control policies, market fixed effects and year-quarter fixed effects. SETTING: United States of America. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 24 370 middle- and high-school students participating in the Monitoring the Future Survey in years 2014 and 2015. MEASUREMENTS: Self-reported e-cigarette use over the last 30 days. Average quarterly cigarette prices, e-cigarette disposable prices and e-cigarette refill prices were constructed from Nielsen retail data (inclusive of excise taxes) for 50 US markets. FINDINGS: In a model with market fixed effects, we estimated that a 10% increase in e-cigarette disposable prices is associated with a reduction in the number of days vaping among e-cigarette users by approximately 9.7% [95% confidence interval (CI) = -17.7 to 1.8%; P = 0.02] and is associated with a reduction in the number of days vaping by the full sample by approximately 17.9% (95% CI = -31.5 to -4.2%; P = 0.01). Refill e-cigarette prices were not statistically significant predictors of vaping. Cigarette prices were not associated significantly with e-cigarette use regardless of the e-cigarette price used. However, in a model without market fixed effects, cigarette prices were a statistically significant positive predictor of total e-cigarette use. CONCLUSIONS: Higher e-cigarette disposable prices appear to be associated with reduced e-cigarette use among adolescents in the US.
Authors: Meghan E Morean; Grace Kong; Dana A Cavallo; Deepa R Camenga; Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: René A Arrazola; Tushar Singh; Catherine G Corey; Corinne G Husten; Linda J Neff; Benjamin J Apelberg; Rebecca E Bunnell; Conrad J Choiniere; Brian A King; Shanna Cox; Tim McAfee; Ralph S Caraballo Journal: MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 17.586
Authors: Jidong Huang; Cezary Gwarnicki; Xin Xu; Ralph S Caraballo; Roy Wada; Frank J Chaloupka Journal: Prev Med Date: 2018-04-21 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: David T Levy; Rafael Meza; Zhe Yuan; Yameng Li; Christopher Cadham; Luz Maria Sanchez-Romero; Nargiz Travis; Marie Knoll; Alex C Liber; Ritesh Mistry; Jana L Hirschtick; Nancy L Fleischer; Sarah Skolnick; Andrew F Brouwer; Cliff Douglas; Jihyoun Jeon; Steven Cook; Kenneth E Warner Journal: Tob Control Date: 2021-09-02 Impact factor: 6.953
Authors: David T Levy; Luz María Sánchez-Romero; Nargiz Travis; Zhe Yuan; Yameng Li; Sarah Skolnick; Jihyoun Jeon; Jamie Tam; Rafael Meza Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-05-03 Impact factor: 4.614
Authors: Yu Wang; Zongshuan Duan; Sherry L Emery; Yoonsang Kim; Frank J Chaloupka; Jidong Huang Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 3.390