Literature DB >> 29193429

Recruiting to cohort studies in specialist healthcare services: Lessons learned from clinical research nurses in UK cleft services.

Fabio Zucchelli1, Nichola Rumsey1,2, Kerry Humphries2, Rhiannon Bennett2, Amy Davies2, Jonathan Sandy2, Nicola Marie Stock1,2.   

Abstract

AIMS AND
OBJECTIVES: To explore the experiences of clinical research nurses recruiting patients in a large specialist care-based cohort study.
BACKGROUND: Longitudinal studies are vital to better understand the aetiology and moderators of health conditions. This need is especially salient for congenital conditions, such as cleft lip and/or palate, where establishing large, comprehensive data sets from birth is vital to improve understanding and to inform interventions. Various barriers exist in recruiting patients to large cohort studies. The role of clinical research nurses embedded within health settings has grown over past decades to facilitate data collection, yet challenges remain.
DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study.
METHODS: Individual semi-structured interviews with 12 clinical research nurses based in 10 National Health Service cleft services across the UK, recruiting to the Cleft Collective Birth Cohort Study.
RESULTS: Of seven emergent themes, three highlighted challenges to recruiting patients, another three described facilitative factors, and one theme overlapped challenges and facilitators. Challenges included the life circumstances of potential participants; language barriers; and limited clinical research nurse time for study. Facilitative factors included integrating research into clinical practice; patient information shared with clinical research nurses; and support from the university-based research study team. The theme "Method of data collection" related to both challenges and facilitators.
CONCLUSIONS: The qualitative data from clinical research nurses recruiting to a large birth cohort study provide helpful practical detail for specialist healthcare teams, specialist nurses, clinical research nurses and researchers looking to optimise recruitment and data collection in longitudinal studies. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings suggest the importance of specialist clinical services and research study teams cooperating to embed research into everyday clinical practice, without compromising care. This should facilitate patients' willingness to participate in important research like the Cleft Collective study and provide them with a positive experience of research.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  facilitators; qualitative approaches; research implementation; research in practice; specialist nursing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29193429     DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14188

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  3 in total

1.  Conducting Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Research During a Pandemic: Challenges and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Marliese Dion Nist; Sharon G Casavant; Robin B Dail; Kayla C Everhart; Stephanie Sealschott; Xiaomei S Cong
Journal:  Nurs Res       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr 01       Impact factor: 2.381

2.  Commentary: Duality of practice in clinical research nursing.

Authors:  Naomi Hare
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2022-04-01

3.  Recruitment of Low-wage Workers for a Time-Sensitive Natural Experiment to Evaluate a Minimum Wage Policy: Challenges and Lessons Learned.

Authors:  Amy Shanafelt; Claire Sadeghzadeh; Leah Chapman; Molly De Marco; Lisa Harnack; Susan Gust; Melvin Jackson; Caitlin Caspi
Journal:  Field methods       Date:  2021-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.