Literature DB >> 29192959

Randomized split-face, controlled comparison of treatment with 1565-nm nonablative fractional laser for enlarged facial pores.

W Yu1, J Zhu1, G Ma1, J Yang2, Y Qiu1, Y Chen1, H Chen1, Y Jin1, X Yang1, X Hu1, T Wang1, L Chang1, X Lin1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29192959     DOI： 10.1111/bjd.16115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Dermatol        ISSN： 0007-0963            Impact factor:   9.302


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Efficacy and safety of 1565-nm non-ablative fractional laser versus long-pulsed 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser in treating enlarged facial pores.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Yuxin Zheng; Suiqing Cai
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 2.555

2.  Quantitative assessment of the long-term efficacy and safety of a 1064-nm picosecond laser with fractionated microlens array in the treatment of enlarged pores in Asians: A case-control study.

Authors:  Siriwan Palawisuth; Woraphong Manuskiatti; Chalermkwan Apinuntham; Rungsima Wanitphakdeedecha; Kathryn Anne G Cembrano
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2021-07-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.