Literature DB >> 29192628

A comparative study of the oral microbiome compositions of healthy postmenopausal, premenopausal, and prepubertal Nigerian females, using 16s rrna metagenomics methods.

K C Anukam1, N R Agbakoba2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of information on the oral microbiome compositions of Nigerians, mostly due to lack of appropriate molecular techniques. In this pilot study, we sought to determine and characterize the oral bacterial compositions of "healthy" females.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Oral samples were collected from three randomly selected females aged 56, 28, and 8 years. DNA was extracted and 16S rRNA V4 region was amplified using custom-barcoded primers before sequencing with Illumina MiSeq platform. Quantitative Insights into Microbial Ecology pipeline was used for 16S rRNA recognition. Distribution of taxonomic categories at different levels of resolution was done using the ribosomal RNA similarities to entries in the REFseq protein database. Diversity score was calculated based on the inverse Simpson's index.
RESULTS: The inverse Simpson's diversity index for the postmenopausal, premenopausal, and prepubertal was 7.74, 6.95, and 7.42 respectively. A total of 12 phyla, 70 genera, and 85 species were detected. Firmicutes followed by Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria dominated the oral microbiome of the subjects. Streptococcus thermophilus (33.19%) was the most abundance species in subject 1, while subject 2 was highly predominated by Haemophilus parainfluenzae (80.65%), and subject 3 was predominated by Haemophilus influenzae (23.05%).
CONCLUSION: The study has revealed that bacteria with varying diversities colonized the subjects and it highlighted the importance of metagenomics in deciphering the oral bacterial compositions from females of different age groups. More studies are needed using metagenomics approach, to appreciate these bacterial organisms that are associated with health and disease in our environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29192628     DOI: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_32_17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Niger J Clin Pract            Impact factor:   0.968


  5 in total

Review 1.  Oral microbiomes: more and more importance in oral cavity and whole body.

Authors:  Lu Gao; Tiansong Xu; Gang Huang; Song Jiang; Yan Gu; Feng Chen
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2018-05-07       Impact factor: 14.870

2.  Periodontitis in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: impact on gut microbiota and systemic inflammation.

Authors:  Jinyou Li; Haifeng Lu; Huanwen Wu; Shunmei Huang; Lufang Chen; Qifeng Gui; Wenjing Zhou; Yichen Yang; Yue Wu; Hua Zhang; Qin Zhang; Yunmei Yang
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 5.682

3.  Comparison of gut microbiota structure and Actinobacteria abundances in healthy young adults and elderly subjects: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jun Li; Haiyan Si; Haitao Du; Hongxia Guo; Huanqin Dai; Shiping Xu; Jun Wan
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.605

4.  Healthy Patients Are Not the Best Controls for Microbiome-Based Clinical Studies: Example of Sjögren's Syndrome in a Systematic Review.

Authors:  Elise Doaré; Geneviève Héry-Arnaud; Valérie Devauchelle-Pensec; Guillermo Carvajal Alegria
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 5.  The Microbiome in Periodontitis and Diabetes.

Authors:  Davi Neto de Araújo Silva; Maísa Casarin; Sepehr Monajemzadeh; Beatriz de Brito Bezerra; Renate Lux; Flavia Q Pirih
Journal:  Front Oral Health       Date:  2022-04-08
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.