Literature DB >> 29192535

Prism Adaptation in Rehabilitation? No Additional Effects of Prism Adaptation on Neglect Recovery in the Subacute Phase Poststroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Antonia F Ten Brink1,2, Johanna M A Visser-Meily1,2, Martijn J Schut3, Mirjam Kouwenhoven2, Anja L H Eijsackers2, Tanja C W Nijboer1,3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with neglect ignore or respond slower to contralesional stimuli. Neglect negatively influences independence in activities of daily living (ADL). Prism adaptation (PA) is one of the most frequently studied treatments, yet there is little evidence regarding positive effects on neglect behavior in ADL.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether PA in the subacute phase ameliorates neglect in situations of varying complexity.
METHODS: A total of 70 neglect patients admitted for inpatient stroke rehabilitation received either PA or sham adaptation (SA) for 2 weeks, with full access to standard treatment. There were 7 time-dependent measurements (baseline and 1-4, 6, and 14 weeks after start of treatment). The primary outcome was change of neglect as observed during basic ADL with the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS). Secondary outcomes were changes in performance on a dynamic multitask (ie, the Mobility Assessment Course [MAC]) and a static paper-and-pencil task (ie, a shape cancellation task [SC]).
RESULTS: In all, 34 patients received PA and 35 SA. There were significant time-dependent improvements in performance as measured with the CBS, MAC, and SC (all F > 15.57; P < .001). There was no significant difference in magnitude of improvement between groups on the CBS, MAC, and SC (all F < 2.54; P > .113].
CONCLUSIONS: No beneficial effects of PA over SA in the subacute phase poststroke were observed, which was comparable for situations of varying complexity. Heterogeneity of the syndrome, time post-stroke onset, and the content of treatment as usual are discussed. Basic knowledge on subtypes and recovery patterns would aid the development of tailored treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Catherine Bergego Scale; Mobility Assessment Course; clinical trial; hemispatial neglect; prism adaptation; rehabilitation; stroke; treatment

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29192535     DOI: 10.1177/1545968317744277

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair        ISSN: 1545-9683            Impact factor:   3.919


  11 in total

Review 1.  Choosing Sides: Impact of Prismatic Adaptation on the Lateralization of the Attentional System.

Authors:  Stephanie Clarke; Nicolas Farron; Sonia Crottaz-Herbette
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-06-23

2.  Frontal lesions predict response to prism adaptation treatment in spatial neglect: A randomised controlled study.

Authors:  Kelly M Goedert; Peii Chen; Anne L Foundas; A M Barrett
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.868

Review 3.  Unilateral Spatial Neglect After Stroke: Current Insights.

Authors:  Roberto Gammeri; Claudio Iacono; Raffaella Ricci; Adriana Salatino
Journal:  Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 2.570

4.  Prism adaptation treatment to address spatial neglect in an intensive rehabilitation program: A randomized pilot and feasibility trial.

Authors:  Tomas Vilimovsky; Peii Chen; Kristyna Hoidekrova; Jakub Petioky; Pavel Harsa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Feasibility study of immersive virtual prism adaptation therapy with depth-sensing camera using functional near-infrared spectroscopy in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sungmin Cho; Won Kee Chang; Jihong Park; Seung Hyun Lee; Jongseung Lee; Cheol E Han; Nam-Jong Paik; Won-Seok Kim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Prism Adaptation Treatment Improves Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcome in Individuals With Spatial Neglect: A Retrospective Matched Control Study.

Authors:  Peii Chen; Nicole Diaz-Segarra; Kimberly Hreha; Emma Kaplan; A M Barrett
Journal:  Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl       Date:  2021-05-19

7.  Recovery of Visuospatial Neglect Subtypes and Relationship to Functional Outcome Six Months After Stroke.

Authors:  Margaret J Moore; Kathleen Vancleef; M Jane Riddoch; Celine R Gillebert; Nele Demeyere
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.919

8.  Non-pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non-progressive brain injury.

Authors:  Verity Longley; Christine Hazelton; Calvin Heal; Alex Pollock; Kate Woodward-Nutt; Claire Mitchell; Gorana Pobric; Andy Vail; Audrey Bowen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-01

9.  The Effect of a Complex Intervention Program for Unilateral Neglect in Patients with Acute-Phase Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Hyun-Se Choi; Deok-Ju Kim; Yeong-Ae Yang
Journal:  Osong Public Health Res Perspect       Date:  2019-10

10.  Non-invasive brain stimulation in Stroke patients (NIBS): A prospective randomized open blinded end-point (PROBE) feasibility trial using transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in post-stroke hemispatial neglect.

Authors:  Gemma Learmonth; Christopher S Y Benwell; Gesine Märker; Diana Dascalu; Matthew Checketts; Celestine Santosh; Mark Barber; Matthew Walters; Keith W Muir; Monika Harvey
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 2.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.