Literature DB >> 29192084

Two Draft Genome Sequences of Sphingobacterium sp. Strains Isolated from Honey.

Alexandra Veress1, Tímea Wilk1, János Kiss1, Péter P Papp2, Ferenc Olasz2.   

Abstract

Here, we report two annotated draft genome sequences of Sphingobacterium sp. strains isolated from honey. The genomes of strains 1.A.4 and 1.A.5 show a limited similarity to each other and to genomes of other Sphingobacterium species, indicating that these isolates may represent new species.
Copyright © 2017 Veress et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 29192084      PMCID: PMC5722070          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.01364-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Sphingobacterium species are Gram-negative, nonmotile, and nonfermentative rods (sometimes cocci) belonging to the family Sphingobacteriaceae. Sphingobacteria have been isolated from diverse niches. They commonly occur in soil, plants, food, and animal guts (1–3) and have been reported to cause infections and sepsis in humans (4). Sixty Sphingobacterium sp. whole-genome sequences are available in databases, and four of them are complete sequences. The two Sphingobacterium sp. strains presented here, 1.A.4 and 1.A.5, were isolated from the same honey sample obtained in 2014 from Transylvania, Romania, representing the first Sphingobacterium isolates from a sugar-rich environment. The previous 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis suggested that strains 1.A.4 and 1.A.5 can be classified as belonging to the genus Sphingobacterium, which was confirmed by the analysis of six further genes (dnaJ, groEL, gyrA, gyrB, recA, and rnaP). In order to investigate their whole genomes, total DNA was isolated from the two strains, and 600- to 630-bp fragment libraries were prepared by UD GenoMED (Debrecen, Hungary). The 2 × 300-bp Illumina paired-end sequencing was performed on an Illumina MiSeq platform by the Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Szeged, Hungary, as a custom service. The read numbers were 1.5 million and 930,000, and the estimated coverages of the whole genomes were 112× and 61× for strains 1.A.4 and 1.A.5, respectively. The reads were de novo assembled using the A5-miseq (5) platform. The total lengths of the contigs for strains 1.A.4 and 1.A.5 were 4,005,031 and 4,547,892 bp, and their GC contents were 43.54% and 40.49%, respectively. Annotation of the assembled genome sequences was performed using the Rapid Annotations using Subsystems Technology (RAST) server (6), setting the genetic code to 11 (Archaea, bacteria). In the whole genomes of strains 1.A.4 and 1.A.5, 3,673 and 4,241 annotated genes, 112 and 110 tRNAs, and 27 and 22 rRNAs were identified, respectively. Pairwise comparison (7) of the sequences revealed only 78.55% similarity between strains 1.A.4 and 1.A.5, while their genome sequences showed 81.34% and 84.11% similarities, respectively, to that of Sphingobacterium spiritivorum ATCC 33300, which appeared to be the closest neighbor based on the RAST analysis. Likewise, low similarities were also observed when the genomes of strains 1.A.4 and 1.A.5 were compared with those of other Sphingobacterium genomes (8), suggesting the flexibility of these bacteria. The relatively low similarity of the genome organization of strains 1.A.4 and 1.A.5 to each other and to other Sphingobacterium species raises the possibility that our strains belong to different, yet unidentified, Sphingobacterium species. This assumption is also supported by the fact that the comparison of the genomic copies of the 16S rRNA genes of 1.A.4 and 1.A.5 shows only 97% similarity. The sequences of our isolates potentially representing new species will contribute to a better understanding of the organization of Sphingobacterium genomes.

Accession number(s).

The draft genome sequences of Sphingobacterium sp. 1.A.4 and 1.A.5 have been deposited in NCBI GenBank under accession numbers PEAZ00000000 and PEBA00000000, respectively.
  7 in total

1.  DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities.

Authors:  Johan Goris; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis; Joel A Klappenbach; Tom Coenye; Peter Vandamme; James M Tiedje
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.747

2.  A5-miseq: an updated pipeline to assemble microbial genomes from Illumina MiSeq data.

Authors:  David Coil; Guillaume Jospin; Aaron E Darling
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Sphingobacterium lactis sp. nov. and Sphingobacterium alimentarium sp. nov., isolated from raw milk and a dairy environment.

Authors:  Verena S J Schmidt; Mareike Wenning; Siegfried Scherer
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 2.747

4.  Sphingobacterium daejeonense sp. nov., isolated from a compost sample.

Authors:  Kyoung-Ho Kim; Leonid N Ten; Qing-Mei Liu; Wan-Taek Im; Sung-Taik Lee
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Sphingobacterium hotanense sp. nov., isolated from soil of a Populus euphratica forest, and emended descriptions of Sphingobacterium daejeonense and Sphingobacterium shayense.

Authors:  Ting Xiao; Xiang He; Gang Cheng; Haiju Kuang; Xiangru Ma; Khayir Yusup; Maryam Hamdun; Abaidulla Gulsimay; Chengxiang Fang; Erkin Rahman
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 2.747

6.  Complete Genome Sequence of Sphingobacterium sp. Strain ML3W, Isolated from Wings of Myotis lucifugus Infected with White Nose Syndrome.

Authors:  Stephen A Smith; Stephen P Krasucki; John V McDowell; Virginia L Balke
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-01-22

7.  The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Authors:  Ramy K Aziz; Daniela Bartels; Aaron A Best; Matthew DeJongh; Terrence Disz; Robert A Edwards; Kevin Formsma; Svetlana Gerdes; Elizabeth M Glass; Michael Kubal; Folker Meyer; Gary J Olsen; Robert Olson; Andrei L Osterman; Ross A Overbeek; Leslie K McNeil; Daniel Paarmann; Tobias Paczian; Bruce Parrello; Gordon D Pusch; Claudia Reich; Rick Stevens; Olga Vassieva; Veronika Vonstein; Andreas Wilke; Olga Zagnitko
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 3.969

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.