Cliona Ni Mhurchu1, Helen Eyles2, Yannan Jiang2, Tony Blakely3. 1. National Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. Electronic address: c.nimhurchu@auckland.ac.nz. 2. National Institute for Health Innovation, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand. 3. Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are few objective data on how nutrition labels are used in real-world shopping situations, or how they affect dietary choices and patterns. DESIGN: The Starlight study was a four-week randomised, controlled trial of the effects of three different types of nutrition labels on consumer food purchases: Traffic Light Labels, Health Star Rating labels, or Nutrition Information Panels (control). Smartphone technology allowed participants to scan barcodes of packaged foods and receive randomly allocated labels on their phone screen, and to record their food purchases. The study app therefore provided objectively recorded data on label viewing behaviour and food purchases over a four-week period. A post-hoc analysis of trial data was undertaken to assess frequency of label use, label use by food group, and association between label use and the healthiness of packaged food products purchased. RESULTS: Over the four-week intervention, study participants (n = 1255) viewed nutrition labels for and/or purchased 66,915 barcoded packaged products. Labels were viewed for 23% of all purchased products, with decreasing frequency over time. Shoppers were most likely to view labels for convenience foods, cereals, snack foods, bread and bakery products, and oils. They were least likely to view labels for sugar and honey products, eggs, fish, fruit and vegetables, and meat. Products for which participants viewed the label and subsequently purchased the product during the same shopping episode were significantly healthier than products where labels were viewed but the product was not subsequently purchased: mean difference in nutrient profile score -0.90 (95% CI -1.54 to -0.26). CONCLUSIONS: In a secondary analysis of a nutrition labelling intervention trial, there was a significant association between label use and the healthiness of products purchased. Nutrition label use may therefore lead to healthier food purchases.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There are few objective data on how nutrition labels are used in real-world shopping situations, or how they affect dietary choices and patterns. DESIGN: The Starlight study was a four-week randomised, controlled trial of the effects of three different types of nutrition labels on consumer food purchases: Traffic Light Labels, Health Star Rating labels, or Nutrition Information Panels (control). Smartphone technology allowed participants to scan barcodes of packaged foods and receive randomly allocated labels on their phone screen, and to record their food purchases. The study app therefore provided objectively recorded data on label viewing behaviour and food purchases over a four-week period. A post-hoc analysis of trial data was undertaken to assess frequency of label use, label use by food group, and association between label use and the healthiness of packaged food products purchased. RESULTS: Over the four-week intervention, study participants (n = 1255) viewed nutrition labels for and/or purchased 66,915 barcoded packaged products. Labels were viewed for 23% of all purchased products, with decreasing frequency over time. Shoppers were most likely to view labels for convenience foods, cereals, snack foods, bread and bakery products, and oils. They were least likely to view labels for sugar and honey products, eggs, fish, fruit and vegetables, and meat. Products for which participants viewed the label and subsequently purchased the product during the same shopping episode were significantly healthier than products where labels were viewed but the product was not subsequently purchased: mean difference in nutrient profile score -0.90 (95% CI -1.54 to -0.26). CONCLUSIONS: In a secondary analysis of a nutrition labelling intervention trial, there was a significant association between label use and the healthiness of products purchased. Nutrition label use may therefore lead to healthier food purchases.
Authors: Tailane Scapin; Ana Carolina Fernandes; Maria Shahid; Simone Pettigrew; Neha Khandpur; Greyce Luci Bernardo; Paula Lazzarin Uggioni; Rossana Pacheco da Costa Proença Journal: Front Nutr Date: 2022-06-16
Authors: Jakob D Jensen; Elizabeth A Giorgi; Jennifer R Jackson; Julia Berger; Rachael A Katz; Amy R Mobley Journal: Nutrition Date: 2020-07-31 Impact factor: 4.008
Authors: Li Bai; Zhengjie Cai; Yalan Lv; Tingting Wu; Manoj Sharma; Zumin Shi; Xiaorong Hou; Yong Zhao Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-09-19 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Fábio Montagna Sekiyama; Renne Rodrigues; Arthur Eumann Mesas; Alberto Durán González; Selma Maffei de Andrade Journal: Int J Prev Med Date: 2019-01-15
Authors: Eva María Navarrete-Muñoz; Laura Torres-Collado; Desirée Valera-Gran; Sandra Gonzalez-Palacios; Laura María Compañ-Gabucio; Sergio Hernández-Sánchez; Manuela García-de-la-Hera Journal: Nutrients Date: 2018-04-03 Impact factor: 5.717