| Literature DB >> 29191249 |
Zhe Li1, Zhao Zhang1,2, Wai-Kit Ming1,3, Xin Chen1, Xiao-Min Xiao4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The present study was conducted to evaluate the distribution of Wharton's jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells (WJMSCs) and their repairing function on the oviduct.Entities:
Keywords: Green fluorescent protein; Oviducts; Tracing; Transformation; Wharton’s jelly-derived mesenchymal stem cells
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29191249 PMCID: PMC5709981 DOI: 10.1186/s13287-017-0714-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther ISSN: 1757-6512 Impact factor: 6.832
Fig. 1Assessment of transfection efficiency using flow cytometry. a Untransfected cells. b Transfection of cells at MOI = 100. c Transfection of cells at MOI = 200. d Transfection of cells at MOI = 400
Cell proliferation ability in the transfer group and the untransfected group
| Group | 24 h (OD) | 48 h (OD) | 72 h (OD) | 96 h (OD) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer | 0.31 ± 0.03 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | 0.64 ± 0.06 | 1.01 ± 0.06 |
| Untransfected | 0.31 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 0.60 ± 0.02 | 0.94 ± 0.05 |
|
| 0.683 | 0.107 | 0.213 | 0.069 |
OD optical density
Fig. 2GFP fluorescence deposits in the epithelia of the oviduct. a Control A group. b Control B group. c Experimental C group. d Experimental D group
Mean optical density of GFP in different rabbit groups
| MOD | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group |
| Oviduct | Uterus | Bladder | Liver |
| Control A | 5 | 56.95 ± 2.26 | 40.03 ± 22.78 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 80.62 ± 13.49 |
| Control B | 5 | 62.45 ± 3.93 | 54.71 ± 0.85 | 49.34 ± 2.40 | 66.87 ± 21.05 |
| Experimental C | 6 | 59.29 ± 7.58 | 37.22 ± 28.85 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 69.43 ± 3.50 |
| Experimental D | 6 | 82.94 ± 14.37 | 57.91 ± 9.53 | 51.86 ± 6.45 | 64.59 ± 1.45 |
|
| 10.549 | 1.633 | 368.295 | 1.843 | |
|
| 0.000 | 0.217 | 0.000 | 0.176 | |
GFP green fluorescent protein, MOD mean optical density
Fig. 3GFP fluorescence deposits in the endometrium. a Control A group. b Control B group. c Experimental C group. d Experimental D group
Fig. 4GFP fluorescence deposits in the epithelia of the bladder. a Control B group. b Experimental D group
Fig. 5GFP fluorescence deposits in hepatic cells. a Control A group. b Control B group. c Experimental C group. d Experimental D group
Mean optical density of GFP in different organs
| Organ | Control A group ( | Control B group ( | Experimental C group ( | Experimental D group ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oviduct | 56.95 ± 2.26 | 62.45 ± 3.93 | 59.29 ± 7.58 | 82.94 ± 14.37 |
| Uterus | 40.03 ± 22.78 | 54.71 ± 0.85 | 37.22 ± 28.85 | 57.91 ± 9.53 |
| Bladder | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 49.34 ± 2.40 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 51.86 ± 6.45 |
| Liver | 80.62 ± 13.49 | 66.87 ± 21.05 | 69.43 ± 3.50 | 64.59 ± 1.45 |
|
| 32.665 | 2.635 | 25.164 | 12.746 |
|
| 0.000 | 0.085 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
GFP green fluorescent protein
Fig. 6CK7-positive staining in the cytoplasm. Observed red fluorescence of CK7 overlapped with green fluorescence of WJMSCs with GFP in tubal epithelium. Yellow fluorescence of colocalization of CK7 and WJMSCs observed in all four groups. a–c Control A group. d–f Control B group. g–i Experimental C group. j–l Experimental D group
Mean optical density of CK7 in rabbit tubal epithelium
| Group |
| CK7 MOD | Compared with respective control group | Compared with experimental group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | P2 | |||
| Control A | 5 | 49.73 ± 1.60 | ||
| Control B | 5 | 61.31 ± 1.75 | ||
| Experimental C | 6 | 50.50 ± 4.82 | 0.745 | |
| Experimental D | 6 | 66.22 ± 5.17 | 0.052 | 0.000 |
F = 24.683, P = 0.000
CK7 cytokeratin 7, MOD mean optical density