Literature DB >> 29191100

Preliminary results of anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment for the treatment of sagittal malalignment.

Pooria Hosseini1, Gregory M Mundis1,2, Robert K Eastlack2, Ramin Bagheri2, Enrique Vargas3, Stacie Tran1, Behrooz A Akbarnia1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Sagittal malalignment decreases patients' quality of life and may require surgical correction to achieve realignment goals. High-risk posterior-based osteotomy techniques are the current standard treatment for addressing sagittal malalignment. More recently, anterior lumbar interbody fusion, anterior column realignment (ALIF ACR) has been introduced as an alternative for correction of sagittal deformity. The objective of this paper was to report clinical and radiographic results for patients treated using the ALIF-ACR technique. METHODS A retrospective study of 39 patients treated with ALIF ACR was performed. Patient demographics, operative details, radiographic parameters, neurological assessments, outcome measures, and preoperative, postoperative, and mean 1-year follow-up complications were studied. RESULTS The patient population comprised 39 patients (27 females and 12 males) with a mean follow-up of 13.3 ± 4.7 months, mean age of 66.1 ± 11.6 years, and mean body mass index of 27.3 ± 6.2 kg/m2. The mean number of ALIF levels treated was 1.5 ± 0.5. Thirty-three (84.6%) of 39 patients underwent posterior spinal fixation and 33 (84.6%) of 39 underwent posterior column osteotomy, of which 20 (60.6%) of 33 procedures were performed at the level of the ALIF ACR. Pelvic tilt, sacral slope, and pelvic incidence were not statistically significantly different between the preoperative and postoperative periods and between the preoperative and 1-year follow-up periods (except for PT between the preoperative and 1-year follow-up, p = 0.018). Sagittal vertical axis, T-1 spinopelvic inclination, lumbar lordosis, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch, intradiscal angle, and motion segment angle all improved from the preoperative to postoperative period and the preoperative to 1-year follow-up (p < 0.05). The changes in motion segment angle and intradiscal angle achieved in the ALIF-ACR group without osteotomy compared with the ALIF-ACR group with osteotomy at the level of ACR were not statistically significant. Total visual analog score, Oswestry Disability Index, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 scores all improved from preoperative to postoperative and preoperative to 1-year follow-up. Fourteen patients (35.9%) experienced 26 complications (15 major and 11 minor). Eleven patients required reoperation. The most common complication was proximal junctional kyphosis (6/26 complications, 23%) followed by vertebral body/endplate fracture (3/26, 12%). CONCLUSIONS This study showed satisfactory radiographic and clinical outcomes at the 1-year follow-up. Proximal junctional kyphosis was the most common complication followed by fracture, complications that are commonly associated with sagittal realignment surgery and may not be mitigated by the anterior approach.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACR; ACR = anterior column realignment; ALIF; ALIF = anterior lumbar interbody fusion; ASD = adult spinal deformity surgery; IDA = intradiscal angle; LL = lumbar lordosis; LLIF = lateral lumbar interbody fusion; MI = minimally invasive; MSA = motion segment angle; ODI = Oswestry Disability Index; PI = pelvic incidence; PT = pelvic tilt; SRS-22 = Scoliosis Research Society–22; SS = sacral slope; SVA = sagittal vertical axis; T1SPI = spinopelvic inclination; VAS = visual analog scale; anterior column realignment; anterior lumbar interbody fusion; complications; fusion grade; minimally invasive surgery; outcome measures; pelvic parameters

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29191100     DOI: 10.3171/2017.8.FOCUS17423

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  11 in total

1.  Biomechanical in vitro comparison between anterior column realignment and pedicle subtraction osteotomy for severe sagittal imbalance correction.

Authors:  Luigi La Barbera; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Christian Liebsch; Tomaso Villa; Andrea Luca; Fabio Galbusera; Marco Brayda-Bruno
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  ALIF in the correction of spinal sagittal misalignment. A systematic review of literature.

Authors:  M Formica; E Quarto; A Zanirato; L Mosconi; M Lontaro-Baracchini; M Alessio-Mazzola; L Felli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Single-position circumferential lumbar spinal fusion: an overview of terminology, concepts, rationale and the current evidence base.

Authors:  J Alex Thomas; Cristiano Menezes; Aaron J Buckland; Kaveh Khajavi; Kimberly Ashayeri; Brett A Braly; Brian Kwon; Ivan Cheng; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 2.721

4.  Evolution of Complex Spine Surgery in Neurosurgery: From Big to Minimally Invasive Surgery for the Treatment of Spinal Deformity.

Authors:  Mohamed Macki; Frank La Marca
Journal:  Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg       Date:  2022

5.  Combined anterior-posterior versus all-posterior approaches for adult spinal deformity correction: a matched control study.

Authors:  Sleiman Haddad; Alba Vila-Casademunt; Çaglar Yilgor; Susana Nuñez-Pereira; Manuel Ramirez; Javier Pizones; Ahmet Alanay; Frank Kleinstuck; Ibrahim Obeid; Francisco Javier Sánchez Pérez-Grueso; Ferran Pellisé
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Retrospective radiographic analysis of anterior lumbar fusion for high grade lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Maziyar A Kalani; Pelagia Kouloumberis; Alexandra E Richards; Mark K Lyons; Victor J Davila; Matthew T Neal
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-12

7.  Technical Note: Pedicle Cement Augmentation with Proximal Screw Toggle and Loosening.

Authors:  Wen Jie Choy; William R Walsh; Kevin Phan; Ralph J Mobbs
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2019-06-09       Impact factor: 2.071

8.  Factors Affecting Postoperative Sagittal Alignment after Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Adult Spinal Deformity: Posterior Osteotomy, Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Rupture, and Endplate Injury.

Authors:  Hiroaki Nakashima; Tokumi Kanemura; Kotaro Satake; Yoshimoto Ishikawa; Jun Ouchida; Naoki Segi; Hidetoshi Yamaguchi; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2019-06-03

9.  Revision Strategies for Harrington Rod Instrumentation: Radiographic Outcomes and Complications.

Authors:  Philip K Louie; Sravisht Iyer; Krishn Khanna; Garrett K Harada; Alina Khalid; Munish Gupta; Douglas Burton; Christopher Shaffrey; Renaud Lafage; Virginie Lafage; Christopher J Dewald; Frank J Schwab; Han Jo Kim
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-10-01

10.  Optimal Correction of Adult Spinal Deformities Requires Restoration of Distal Lumbar Lordosis.

Authors:  S Pesenti; S Prost; A Muñoz McCausland; K Farah; P Tropiano; S Fuentes; B Blondel
Journal:  Adv Orthop       Date:  2021-05-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.