Literature DB >> 29191096

Lumbar computed tomography scans are not appropriate surrogates for bone mineral density scans in primary adult spinal deformity.

Eitan M Kohan1, Venu M Nemani2, Stuart Hershman3, Daniel G Kang4, Michael P Kelly1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE The authors examined the correlation between lumbar spine CT Hounsfield unit (HU) measurements and bone mineral density measurements in an adult spinal deformity (ASD) population. METHODS Patients with ASD were identified in the records of a single institution. Lumbar CT scans were reviewed, and the mean HU measurements from L1-4 were recorded. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed using femoral neck and lumbar spine dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). The number of patients who met criteria for osteoporosis was determined for each imaging modality. RESULTS Forty-eight patients underwent both preoperative DEXA and CT scanning. Forty-three patients were female and 5 were male. Forty-seven patients were Caucasian and one was African American. The mean age of the patients was 62.1 years. Femoral neck DEXA was more likely to identify osteopenia (n = 26) than lumbar spine DEXA (n = 8) or lumbar CT HU measurements (n = 6) (p < 0.001). There was a low-moderate correlation between lumbar spine CT and lumbar spine DEXA (r = 0.463, p < 0.001), and there was poor correlation between lumbar spine CT and femoral neck DEXA (r = 0.303, p = 0.036). CONCLUSIONS Despite the opportunistic utility of lumbar spine CT HU measurements in identifying osteoporosis in patients undergoing single-level fusion, these measurements were not useful in this cohort of ASD patients. The correlation between femoral neck DEXA and HU measurements was poor. DEXA assessment of BMD in ASD patients is essential to optimize the care of these complicated cases.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ASD = adult spinal deformity; BMD = bone mineral density; DEXA = dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry; HU = Hounsfield unit; Hounsfield units; adult spinal deformity; bone mineral density; computed tomography; osteoporosis

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29191096     DOI: 10.3171/2017.9.FOCUS17476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  3 in total

1.  The preoperative Hounsfield unit value at the position of the future screw insertion is a better predictor of screw loosening than other methods.

Authors:  Jingchi Li; Zhuang Zhang; Tianhang Xie; Zhetao Song; Yueming Song; Jiancheng Zeng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 7.034

2.  Pedicle Screws Loosening in Patients With Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: Potential Risk Factors and Relative Contribution.

Authors:  Andrey Bokov; Anatoliy Bulkin; Alexander Aleynik; Marina Kutlaeva; Sergey Mlyavykh
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-05-24

3.  Prevalence of Poor Bone Quality in Patients Undergoing Spine Surgery: A Comprehensive Approach.

Authors:  Ricardo Díaz-Romero Paz; Manuel Sosa Henríquez; Kevin Armas Melián; Claudia Balhen Martin
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2021-01-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.