| Literature DB >> 29190744 |
Soumi Srimani1, Indranil Saha2, Debnath Chaudhuri1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MS) and vitamin D deficiency was reported among postmenopausal women (PMW) in India. However, no report is available regarding the association of MS and 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] among PMW in India. This study aimed to find out the prevalence of MS and 25(OH)D status as well as their association among rural PMW of West Bengal, India.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29190744 PMCID: PMC5708804 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188331
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Distribution of postmenopausal women according to 25(OH)D status in relation with metabolic syndrome, waist circumference, fasting blood glucose, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol and blood pressure (N = 222).
| Parameter | 25-hydroxyvitamin D status | Total | Statistical test | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deficient | Insufficient | Sufficient | ||||||||
| 54 | 53 | 22 | 22 | 26 | 25 | 102 | 100 | 2.23 | 0.32 | |
| 59 | 49 | 20 | 17 | 41 | 34 | 120 | 100 | |||
| 73 | 47 | 33 | 21 | 51 | 32 | 157 | 100 | 4.23 | 0.12 | |
| 40 | 61 | 9 | 14 | 16 | 25 | 65 | 100 | |||
| 36 | 62 | 13 | 22 | 9 | 16 | 58 | 100 | 8.02 | 0.01 | |
| 77 | 47 | 28 | 18 | 58 | 35 | 164 | 100 | |||
| 54 | 54 | 21 | 21 | 25 | 25 | 100 | 100 | 2.38 | 0.3 | |
| 59 | 49 | 21 | 17 | 42 | 34 | 122 | 100 | |||
| 40 | 51 | 18 | 23 | 20 | 26 | 78 | 100 | 1.92 | 0.38 | |
| 73 | 51 | 24 | 16 | 47 | 33 | 144 | 100 | |||
| 77 | 55 | 21 | 15 | 42 | 30 | 140 | 100 | 4.33 | 0.11 | |
| 36 | 44 | 21 | 26 | 25 | 30 | 82 | 100 | |||
Relationship between waist circumference, fasting blood glucose, triglyceride, HDL cholesterol and blood pressure with 25(OH)D level among postmenopausal women (N = 222).
| Parameter | 25-hydroxyvitamin D | Statistical tests | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mann Whitney U test | Spearman's correlation test | |||||
| Yes | 18 | 12–31 | -18.23 | 0.0001 | -0.03 | 0.65 |
| No | 27 | 12–39 | ||||
| <80cm | 16 | 10–29 | -16.58 | 0.0001 | 0.19 | 0.004 |
| ≥80cm | 23 | 14–37 | ||||
| <100mg/dl | 22 | 13–38 | -16.06 | 0.0001 | -0.15 | 0.02 |
| ≥100mg/dl | 18 | 11–27 | ||||
| <150mg/dl | 23 | 11–37 | -17.89 | 0.0001 | 0.15 | 0.82 |
| ≥150mg/dl | 20 | 13–30 | ||||
| <50mg/dl | 20 | 12–30 | -14.66 | 0.0001 | 0.07 | 0.28 |
| ≥50mg/dl | 21 | 12–39 | ||||
| SBP<130mm of Hg | 22 | 13–31 | -18.23 | 0.0001 | -0.1 | 0.11 |
| SBP≥130mm of Hg | 19 | 12–34 | ||||
| DBP<85mm of Hg | 22 | 13–31 | -17.54 | 0.0001 | -0.07 | 0.26 |
| DBP≥85mm of Hg | 19 | 12–37 | ||||
Binary logistic multivariable regression model analysis of 25(OH)D level.
| Parameter | B | S. E. | Wald | df | Sig. | Exp (B) | 95% C. I. for Exp(B) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 0.43 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 1.03 | ||
| 0.000 | 0.02 | 0.000 | 1.00 | 0.98 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 1.04 | ||
| 0.007 | 0.01 | 0.44 | 1.00 | 0.51 | 0.99 | 0.97 | 1.01 | ||
| 0.004 | 0.002 | 3.01 | 1.00 | 0.08 | 1.004 | 1.00 | 1.008 | ||
| 0.03 | 0.01 | 5.77 | 1.00 | 0.02 | 0.97 | 0.94 | 0.99 | ||
| 0.008 | 0.005 | 2.83 | 1.00 | 0.09 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 1.02 | ||
| 1.49 | 1.54 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 0.34 | 4.42 | ||||
aVariable(s) entered on Step 1: SBP, DBP, HDL, TG, WC, FBS.