| Literature DB >> 29189761 |
Lucia D'Accolti1,2, Nicoletta De Vietro3, Fiorenza Fanelli4, Caterina Fusco5, Angelo Nacci6,7, Francesco Fracassi8,9.
Abstract
Low pressure plasma was used for preparing heterogeneous organocatalysts 2-(A)-(C) suitable for dioxirane-mediated epoxidations. Heterogenization was accomplished by adsorption of the methyl perfluoroheptyl ketone (2) on fluorinated supports (A)-(C) deriving from the treatment of commercial C₈-silica gel in low pressure plasma fed with fluorocarbons. Catalyst 2-(C) proved to be the most efficient one, promoting epoxidation of an array of alkenes, including unsaturated fatty esters like methyl oleate (10) and the triglyceride soybean oil (11), with the cheap potassium peroxymonosulfate KHSO₅ (caroate) as a green oxidant. Notably, the perfluorinated matrix gives rise to the activation of caroate, generating singlet oxygen. Materials were characterized by infrared Attenuated Total Reflectance spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS ) and Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (FESEM).Entities:
Keywords: PE-CVD; dioxiranes; epoxidation; fluorous chemistry
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29189761 PMCID: PMC6149926 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22122099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Scheme 1Generation of dioxirane in situ from ketone/caroate.
Figure 1Preparation of heterogeneous perfluorinated organocatalysts.
Epoxidation of alkene 3 with potassium caroate a.
| Run | Catalyst | Loading b (%) | Time (h) | Conv. c (%) | Selectivity (%) c | Leaching | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3a | 3b | ||||||
| 1 |
| 9.7 | 5 | 90 | 96 | -- | -- |
| 2 | 9.7 | 4 | 75 | 72 | 28 | yes | |
| 3 | 9.7 | 4 | 95 | 68 | 29 | yes | |
| 4 | 9.7 | 4 | 97 | 83 | 17 | none | |
| 5 | 14.6 | 2 | 95 | 86 | 14 | none | |
| 6 | 9.7 | 2 | 80 | 84 | 16 | none | |
| 7 | 4.8 | 2 | 90 | 68 | 32 | none | |
| 8 | 0.0 | 2 | 80 | - | 93 | none | |
| 9 d | 4.8 | 4 | 95 | 95 | 5 | none | |
a Reaction conditions: alkene (3) (1 mmol), heterogeneous catalyst (100 mg, with loaded ketone (2) as indicated), caroate (4 mmol, corresponding to 2.86 mmol/g of Caroat® triple salt, iodometry), CH3CN/aq. buffer, T = 25 °C. b Mol% of dioxirane precursor 2 respect to substrate 3. c Evaluated by GLC. d Oxidant/substrate ratio of 6:1 was used in the presence of NaN3 (30 mg, 0.46 mmol) as an additive.
Figure 2Proposed mechanism for caroate activation by fluorinated silica gel support.
Figure 3ATR-FTIR spectra of C8 Silica gel (A) pristine, (B) after plasma coating and (C) after plasma coating and ketone (2) impregnation.
XPS Atomic composition of supports and catalyst 2-(C) a.
| Run | Support | C% | O% | Si% | F% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | C8-silica gel | 27 ± 2 | 49 ± 1 | 24 ± 1 | / |
| 2 | Perfluorin. silica gel 60 (A) | 17 ± 3 | 42 ± 2 | 24 ± 2 | 17 ± 3 |
| 3 | Perfluorin. silica gel grafted (B) | 19 ± 2 | 35 ± 3 | 22 ± 3 | 24 ± 3 |
| 4 | Perfluorin. silica gel coated (C) | 41 ± 3 | 2 ± 1 | 1 ± 1 | 56 ± 3 |
| 5 | Catalyst 2-(C) | 32 ± 3 | 26 ± 3 | 7 ± 2 | 35 ± 3 |
a Maximum relative standard deviation 3% ca.
Figure 4(A) Pristine silica powder; (B) silica powder with perfluoro plasma polymer.
Figure 5Recycling of 2-(C) organocatalysts in the epoxidation of alkene 3 with caroate.
Figure 6(A) Exhausted catalyst 2-(C); (B) regenerated catalyst 2-(C).
Substrate scope in the alkene epoxidation promoted by catalyst 2-(C) a.
| Run | Substrate | Oxd./Sub. b | Time | Conv. c | Products (Yield %) d |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 2 | 98 | ||
| 2 | 4 | 1 | 98 | ||
| 3 | 8 | 12 | 15 | ||
| 4 | 4 | 48 | 16 | ||
| 5 | 8 | 4 | 98 | ||
| 6 | 12 | 48 | 2 | ||
| 7 | 4 | 4 | 95 | ||
| 8 | 10 | 9 | 95 |
a Reaction conditions: substrate (1 mmol), 100 mg of catalyst 2-(C) (bearing 9.7 × 10−2 mmol of 2 per 100 mg), caroate as indicated (Caroat® triple salt, iodometry), CH3CN/aq. buffer, T = 25 °C. b KHSO5 to substrate molar ratio. c Evaluated by GLC. d Isolated yields. e Mixture of syn/anti stereoisomers in a 60:40 ratio ca., as determined by GC-MS. f A 15% of cyclohexanone was detected by GC-MS. g GLC yield. h Evaluated by NMR (Figure S3 in Supporting Information)
Figure 7Schematic of the low pressure plasma reactor utilized for the silica gel treatment.