| Literature DB >> 29189749 |
Daniil N Olennikov1,2, Nadezhda K Chirikova3, Nina I Kashchenko4, Tat'yana G Gornostai5, Inessa Yu Selyutina6, Ifrat N Zilfikarov7.
Abstract
The influence of climatic factors, e.g., low temperature, on the phytochemical composition and bioactivity of the arctic plant Dracocephalum palmatum Steph. ax Willd. (palmate dragonhead), a traditional food and medical herb of Northern Siberia, was investigated. D. palmatum seedlings were grown in a greenhouse experiment at normal (20 °C, NT) and low (1 °C, LT) temperature levels and five groups of components that were lipophilic and hydrophilic in nature were characterized. The analyses indicated that D. palmatum under NT demonstrates high content of photosynthetic pigments, specific fatty acid (FA) profile with domination of saturated FA (53.3%) and the essential oil with trans-pinocamphone as a main component (37.9%). Phenolic compounds were identified using a combination of high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection and electrospray ionization mass-spectrometric detection (HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS) techniques, as well as free carbohydrates and water soluble polysaccharides. For the first time, it was established that the cold acclimation of D. palmatum seedlings resulted in various changes in physiological and biochemical parameters such as membrane permeability, photosynthetic potential, membrane fluidity, leaf surface secretory function, reactive oxygen species-antioxidant balance, osmoregulator content and cell wall polymers. In brief, results showed that the adaptive strategy of D. palmatum under LT was realized on the accumulation of membrane or surface components with more fluid properties (unsaturated FA and essential oils), antioxidants (phenolic compounds and enzymes), osmoprotectants (free sugars) and cell wall components (polysaccharides). In addition, the occurrence of unusual flavonoids including two new isomeric malonyl esters of eriodictyol-7-O-glucoside was found in LT samples. Data thus obtained allow improving our understanding of ecophysiological mechanisms of cold adaptation of arctic plants.Entities:
Keywords: Dracocephalum palmatum; antioxidant activity; carbohydrates; essential oil; fatty acids; gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS); high performance liquid chromatography with diode array detection and electrospray ionization mass-spectrometric detection (HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS); low-temperature cultivation; phenolic compounds
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29189749 PMCID: PMC5751182 DOI: 10.3390/ijms18122579
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Electrolyte leakage (percent of total electrolytes ± SD), photosynthetic pigments content (µg/g of fresh leaf weight (FW) ± standard deviation (SD)), carbon assimilation rate (µM CO2/m2·s ± SD) and effective quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm; ±SD) in D. palmatum leaves cultivated under normal (20 °C) and low (1 °C) temperatures. 1
| Parameter | Temperature (°C) | |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1 | |
| Electrolyte leakage, % of total electrolytes | 18.2 ± 0.9 a | 26.7 ± 1.4 a |
| Chlorophyll a content (Chla), µg/g FW | 273.45 ± 9.29 a | 406.19 ± 13.40 a |
| Chlorophyll b content (Chlb), µg/g FW | 75.85 ± 2.50 a | 141.21 ± 4.79 a |
| Total chlorophylls content (ΣChl), µg/g FW | 349.30 | 547.40 |
| Chla/Chlb | 3.61 | 2.88 |
| Pheophytin a content, µg/g FW | 6.01 ± 0.16 a | 7.06 ± 0.14 a |
| Pheophytin b content, µg/g FW | 4.57 ± 0.10 a | 5.64 ± 0.11 a |
| Total pheophytins content, µg/g FW | 10.58 | 12.70 |
| Carotenoids content (Car), µg/g DW | 36.86 ± 1.07 a | 53.31 ± 1.55 a |
| ΣChl/Car | 9.48 | 10.27 |
| Carbon assimilation rate, µM CO2/m2·s | 8.3 ± 0.8 b | 5.8 ± 0.4 b |
| Fv/Fm | 0.62 ± 0.04 b | 0.54 ± 0.03 b |
1 Averages ± standard deviations were obtained from three (a) or ten (b) different experiments.
Fatty acids (FA) composition of D. palmatum herb under different temperatures of cultivation (percentage of total FA content).
| Compound | Temperature (°C) | |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1 | |
| Pelargonic acid (9:0) | 0.1 | Tr. |
| Capric acid (10:0) | 0.2 | Tr. |
| Lauric acid (12:0) | 5.7 | 3.2 |
| Tridecylic acid (13:0) | 1.4 | 0.5 |
| Myristic acid (14:0) | 2.7 | 1.7 |
| Pentadecylic acid (15:0) | 0.4 | 0.3 |
| Palmitic acid (16:0) | 27.9 | 11.2 |
| Palmitoleic acid (16:1) | 3.8 | 6.9 |
| Margaric acid (17:0) | 1.8 | 1.4 |
| Stearic acid (18:0) | 8.0 | 5.2 |
| Oleic acid (18:1 ω-9) | 11.3 | 18.3 |
| Linoleic acid (18:2 ω-6) | 14.1 | 19.3 |
| α-Linolenic acid (18:3 ω-3) | 12.5 | 18.2 |
| γ-Linolenic acid (18:3 ω-6) | 2.1 | 7.4 |
| Arachidic acid (20:0) | 4.5 | 0.5 |
| Gondoic acid (20:1 ω-9) | 2.0 | 3.7 |
| Behenic acid (22:0) | 0.5 | Tr. |
| Erucic acid (22:1 ω-9) | 0.7 | 1.2 |
| Lignoceric acid (24:0) | 0.1 | Tr. |
| Total | 99.8 | 99.0 |
| Saturated FA | 53.3 | 24.0 |
| Unsaturated FA | 46.5 | 75.0 |
| Monounsaturated FA | 17.8 | 30.1 |
| Polyunsaturated FA | 28.7 | 44.9 |
Tr., traces (<0.1%).
Essential oil (EO) composition (percentage of total component content) of D. palmatum herb under different temperatures of cultivation.
| Compound | RI | MI a | Temperature (°C) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1 | |||
| Aliphatic compounds | ||||
| Isoamyl acetate | 875 | i, ii, iii | 0.6 | 0.5 |
| Subtotal | 0.6 | 0.5 | ||
| Simple phenols | ||||
| 1024 | i, ii, iii | 1.7 | 1.8 | |
| 1186 | i, ii | 1.9 | 2.0 | |
| 1222 | i, ii, iii | 0.4 | 0.4 | |
| 1225 | i, ii | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
| Cuminaldehyde | 1241 | i, ii, iii | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Subtotal | 5.3 | 5.5 | ||
| Monoterpenes | ||||
| α-Thujene | 926 | i, ii | 0.6 | 0.4 |
| α-Pinene | 932 | i, ii, iii | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Camphene | 947 | i, ii, iii | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Sabinene | 973 | i, ii, iii | 2.5 | 2.0 |
| β-Pinene | 975 | i, ii, iii | 8.6 | 9.0 |
| β-Myrcene | 991 | i, ii, iii | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Pseudolimonene | 1003 | i, ii | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| β-Phellandrene | 1027 | i, ii, iii | 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Limonene | 1029 | i, ii, iii | 1.8 | 1.8 |
| 1,8-Cineol | 1031 | i, ii, iii | 5.5 | 5.8 |
| γ-Terpinene | 1058 | i, ii, iii | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| Linalool | 1100 | i, ii, iii | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| β-Pinone | 1105 | i, ii | 0.8 | 1.0 |
| trans-Pinocarveol | 1138 | i, ii, iii | 1.0 | 1.4 |
| trans-Pinocamphone | 1161 | i, ii | 37.9 | 40.7 |
| 1175 | i, ii | 8.0 | 8.7 | |
| 1186 | i, ii | 0.2 | 0.5 | |
| Terpinene-4-ol | 1177 | i, ii, iii | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Myrtenol | 1197 | i, ii | 2.7 | 3.3 |
| Phellandral | 1276 | i, ii | 0.2 | 0.1 |
| Bornyl acetate | 1287 | i, ii, iii | 0.3 | 0.2 |
| trans-Pinocarvyl acetate | 1301 | i, ii | 1.8 | 2.0 |
| 1315 | i, ii | 0.4 | 0.7 | |
| Myrtenyl acetate | 1327 | i, ii, iii | 3.5 | 3.7 |
| 1329 | i, ii | 0.4 | 0.1 | |
| Subtotal | 85.0 | 90.8 | ||
| Sesquiterpenes | ||||
| β-Caryophyllene | 1420 | i, ii, iii | 1.0 | 0.4 |
| γ-Cadinene | 1518 | i, ii | 0.5 | Tr. |
| Germacrene B | 1560 | i, ii | 0.7 | 0.1 |
| Caryophyllene oxide | 1587 | i, ii, iii | 1.8 | 0.5 |
| Viridiflorol | 1594 | i, ii | 3.2 | 1.6 |
| α-Cadinol | 1659 | i, ii | 1.2 | 0.3 |
| Germacrone | 1696 | i, ii | 0.6 | 0.2 |
| Subtotal | 9.0 | 3.1 | ||
| Total | 99.9 | 99.9 | ||
a Methods of identification: i, retention index; ii, mass spectrum; iii, co-injection with authentic sample. Tr., traces (<0.1%).
Figure 1HPLC-UV map (a); and RP-HPLC-DAD chromatogram at 280 nm (b) of low-temperature sample of D. palmatum herb; ESI-MS spectra of unknown compounds 6 (eriodictyol-O-malonyl-hexoside) and 20 (luteolin-O-acetyl-hexoside) presented at (c,d), respectively. The numbers in the Figure 1a,b correspond to the compounds indicated in Table 4. AU, absorbance units; Int., signal intensity.
HPLC parameters, ultraviolet spectra data (UV) and electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) data of components 1–32 from D. palmatum herb.
| No. | Compound | tR (min) | UV, λmax (nm) | ESI-MS ( | Refs. Comp.a |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.79 | 280 | 381 [M + Na]+, | iii [ | ||
| Arbutin | 7.89 | 280 | 295 [M + Na]+, 273 [M + H]+ | i | |
| 5- | 10.43 | 331 | 353 [M − H]−, 183 | i | |
| 3- | 12.03 | 331 | 353 [M − H]−, 183 | i | |
| Caffeic acid | 13.15 | 323 | 179 [M − H]− | i | |
| Eriodictyol- | 14.09 | 284 | 535 [M − H]−, | - | |
| Luteolin-7,4′-di- | 14.87 | 253, 265, 345 | 905 [M − H]−, | ii [ | |
| Luteolin-7- | 15.02 | 253, 265, 345 | 755 [M − H]−, | ii [ | |
| Eriodictyol- | 15.41 | 283 | 535 [M − H]−, | - | |
| Eriodictyol-7- | 16.21 | 284 | 595 [M − H]−, | i | |
| Luteolin-7- | 17.02 | 252, 262, 345 | 593 [M − H]−, | i | |
| Eriodictyol-7- | 17.58 | 283 | 899 [2M − H]−, | i | |
| Luteolin-7- | 19.48 | 254, 267, 348 | 895 [2M − H]−, | i | |
| Luteolin-4′- | 20.64 | 260, 335 | 447 [M − H]−, | i | |
| Apigenin-7- | 22.51 | 266, 334 | 577 [M − H]−, | i | |
| Naringenin-7- | 23.89 | 283 | 433 [M − H]−, | i | |
| Apigenin-7- | 24.47 | 267, 336 | 863 [2M − H]−, | i | |
| Apigenin- | 25.31 | 265, 334 | 431 [M − H]−, | iii [ | |
| Rosmarinic acid | 27.26 | 327 | 359 [M − H]−, 183 | i | |
| Luteolin- | 29.11 | 251, 263, 346 | 489 [M − H]−, | iii [ | |
| Eriodictyol | 35.03 | 283 | 287 [M − H]− | i | |
| Acacetin-7- | 36.14 | 267, 330 | 591 [M − H]−, | i | |
| Acacetin-7- | 36.72 | 266, 330 | 445 [M − H]−, | i | |
| Luteolin | 37.72 | 253, 266, 347 | 285 [M − H]− | i | |
| Acacetin- | 38.10 | 266, 331 | 487 [M − H]−, | iii [ | |
| Naringenin | 38.32 | 283 | 271 [M − H]− | i | |
| Apigenin | 39.75 | 267, 336 | 269 [M − H]− | i | |
| Chrysoeriol | 40.21 | 266, 347 | 299 [M − H]− | i | |
| Acacetin | 42.34 | 267, 330 | 283 [M − H]− | i | |
| Isothymusin | 43.06 | 302, 330 | 329 [M − H]− | ii [ | |
| Salvigenin | 45.81 | 273, 330 | 327 [M − H]− | i | |
| Genkwanin | 46.04 | 267, 335 | 283 [M − H]− | i |
a Reference compound used: i, commercial sample; ii, isolated compound; iii, literature data.
Figure 2Structures of phenolic compounds 2–5, 7, 8, 10–17, 19, 21–24, and 26–32 detected in D. palmatum herb.
Content of phenolic compounds (mg/g DW ± SD) in D. palmatum herb under different temperatures of cultivation. 1
| Compound (No of Compounds) | Temperature (°C) | |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1 | |
| Simple phenols | ||
| 0.39 ± 0.01 a | 1.24 ± 0.02 a | |
| Arbutin ( | 0.17 ± 0.00 | 0.22 ± 0.00 |
| Subtotal | 0.56 | 1.46 |
| Phenylpropanoids | ||
| 5- | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 0.05 ± 0.00 |
| 3- | 0.11 ± 0.00 | 0.09 ± 0.00 |
| Caffeic acid ( | 0.61 ± 0.02 | 0.84 ± 0.02 |
| Rosmarinic acid ( | 1.26 ± 0.03 | 1.68 ± 0.04 |
| Subtotal | 2.07 | 2.66 |
| Flavone glycosides. Apigenin derivatives | ||
| Apigenin-7- | 1.11 ± 0.03 | 0.56 ± 0.02 |
| Apigenin-7- | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 6.54 ± 0.17 |
| Apigenin- | 0.47 ± 0.01 b | 8.34 ± 0.18 b |
| Subtotal | 2.11 | 15.44 |
| Flavone glycosides. Acacetin derivatives | ||
| Acacetin-7- | 0.04 ± 0.00 | 0.06 ± 0.00 |
| Acacetin-7- | 0.52 ± 0.01 | 1.27 ± 0.04 |
| Acacetin- | ND | 0.08 ± 0.00 c |
| Subtotal | 0.56 | 1.41 |
| Flavone glycosides. Luteolin derivatives | ||
| Luteolin-7,4′-di- | 0.14 ± 0.00 | 0.52 ± 0.01 |
| Luteolin-7- | 0.82 ± 0.02 | 1.75 ± 0.04 |
| Luteolin-7- | 2.27 ± 0.07 | 2.54 ± 0.07 |
| Luteolin-7- | 2.56 ± 0.07 | 29.56 ± 0.78 |
| Luteolin-4′- | 0.67 ± 0.02 | 9.57 ± 0.19 |
| Luteolin- | ND | 0.92 ± 0.02 d |
| Subtotal | 6.46 | 44.86 |
| Flavanone glycosides. Eriodictyol derivatives | ||
| Eriodictyol- | ND | 1.84 ± 0.04 e |
| Eriodictyol-7- | 0.21 ± 0.00 | 1.35 ± 0.03 |
| Eriodictyol-7- | 1.77 ± 0.03 | 15.82 ± 0.33 |
| Subtotal | 1.98 | 19.01 |
| Flavanone glycosides. Naringenin derivatives | ||
| Naringenin-7- | 1.02 ± 0.02 | 1.64 ± 0.03 |
| Subtotal | 1.02 | 1.64 |
| Flavone aglycones | ||
| Luteolin ( | 1.19 ± 0.03 | 12.94 ± 0.30 |
| Apigenin ( | 0.46 ± 0.01 | 1.03 ± 0.03 |
| Chrysoeriol ( | 0.09 ± 0.00 | 0.14 ± 0.00 |
| Acacetin ( | ND | 0.18 ± 0.00 |
| Salvigenin ( | ND | 0.09 ± 0.00 |
| Isothymusin ( | ND | 0.12 ± 0.00 |
| Genkwanin ( | ND | 0.10 ± 0.00 |
| Subtotal | 1.74 | 14.60 |
| Flavanone aglycones | ||
| Eriodictyol ( | 0.24 ± 0.00 | 0.69 ± 0.02 |
| Naringenin ( | ND | 0.54 ± 0.01 |
| Subtotal | 0.24 | 1.23 |
| Total flavone glycosides | 9.13 | 61.71 |
| Total flavanone glycosides | 3.00 | 20.65 |
| Total flavonoids glycosides | 12.13 | 82.36 |
| Total flavonoids aglycones | 1.98 | 15.83 |
| Total flavonoids | 14.11 | 98.19 |
| Total phenolic compounds | 16.74 | 102.31 |
1 Averages ± standard deviation were obtained from three different experiments. a Expressed as arbutin equivalents; b expressed as apigenin-7-O-glucoside equivalents; c expressed as acacetin-7-O-glycoside equivalents; d expressed as luteolin-7-O-glucoside equivalents; e expressed as eryodictyol-7-O-glucoside equivalents; ND—not detected.
Figure 3RP-HPLC-MS chromatograms in selected ion monitoring mode (SIM, negative ionization) of free sugars fraction of D. palmatum herb (low-temperature sample). SIM with following m/z value used: 179 for glucose, 341 for sucrose, 503 for raffinose, 665 for stachyose. On cuts, mass spectra of corresponding compounds; AU, absorbance units.
HPLC parameters, electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) data and the content of simple sugars (mg/g DW ± SD) in D. palmatum herb under different temperatures of cultivation.
| Compound | tR (min) | ESI-MS ( | Content (mg/g) 1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature (°C) | ||||
| 20 | 1 | |||
| Glucose | 2.38 | 179 [M − H]− | 16.86 ± 0.32 | 26.39 ± 0.52 |
| Sucrose | 2.73 | 341 [M − H]− | 35.54 ± 0.78 | 169.21 ± 3.72 |
| Stachyose | 2.89 | 665 [M − H]− | 1.72 ± 0.03 | 38.95 ± 0.82 |
| Raffinose | 3.04 | 503 [M − H]− | 0.87 ± 0.02 | 9.36 ± 0.18 |
| Total content | 54.99 | 243.91 | ||
1 Averages ± standard deviations were obtained from three different experiments.
Yield of raw water soluble polysaccharide (RWSP) of D. palmatum herb under different temperatures of cultivation, their general characteristics and monosaccharide compositions.
| Parameter | Temperature (°C) | |
|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1 | |
| RWSP yield (%) a | 2.29 ± 0.04 c | 9.86 ± 0.20 c |
| RWSP general characteristics | ||
| Protein content, % b | 2.61 ± 0.07 c | 2.75 ± 0.09 c |
| Uronic acids, % b | 43.57 ± 1.01 c | 46.16 ± 1.14 c |
| Reaction with I2 (starch) | positive | positive |
| Reaction with resorcinol (inulin) | negative | negative |
| Reaction with Yariv’s reagent (AGP-complexes) | positive | positive |
| Reaction with Fehling’s reagent (mannans) | negative | negative |
| RWSP monosaccharide composition (mol %) | ||
| Ara | 10.1 | 10.2 |
| Gal | 26.1 | 27.7 |
| Glc | 14.4 | 10.2 |
| Fuc | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| Man | 4.3 | 4.0 |
| Rha | 1.9 | 1.7 |
| Rib | Tr. d | Tr. d |
| Xyl | Tr. d | Tr. d |
| GalA | 41.2 | 44.6 |
| GlcA | 1.8 | 1.4 |
a Percentage of dry plant weight ± SD; b Percentage of dry RWSP weight ± SD; c Averages ± standard deviations were obtained from three different experiments; d Tr., traces (<0.1 mol %).
Malondialdehyde (MDA) content, superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase activities of D. palmatum leaves and antioxidant activity of D. palmatum extracts obtained from the herb grown under different temperatures of cultivation and luteolin-7-O-glucoside as a reference compound a,b.
| Parameter | Luteolin-7- | Temperature (°C) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20 | 1 | ||
| MDA content (nM/g) FW | - | 92.74 ± 7.41 | 197.02 ± 15.76 |
| SOD activity (U/g·min) FW | - | 57.90 ± 5.21 | 264.32 ± 12.35 |
| Catalase activity (U/g·min) FW | - | 0.93 ± 0.06 | 1.53 ± 0.12 |
| Total antioxidant capacity (mg-eq). luteolin-7- | 1000 iii | 280.98 ± 8.99 i | 682.26 ± 21.15 ii,iii |
| DPPH•-radical scavenging activity, IC50 (µg/mL) | 16.97 ± 0.34 iv,v | 33.28 ± 0.73 vi | 11.40 ± 0.24 iv |
| ABTS•+-radical scavenging activity, IC50 (µg/mL) | 9.86 ± 0.19 vii,viii | 14.62 ± 0.31 viii | 5.69 ± 0.11 vii |
| O2•−-radical scavenging activity, IC50 (µg/mL) | 14.92 ± 0.43 ix,x | 18.36 ± 0.56 x | 9.21 ± 0.21 ix |
| Br•-radical scavenging activity (mg-eq). luteolin-7- | 1000 xii | 150.19 ± 1.95 xi | 799.63 ± 11.19 xii |
| NO inactivating activity, IC50 (µg/mL) | >100 | 37.92 ± 1.59 | 21.37 ± 0.85 xiii |
| H2O2 inactivating activity (mM/g) | 0.53 ± 0.02 xiv | 1.56 ± 0.04 | 2.75 ± 0.06 xv |
| Fe2+-chelating activity (µM) Fe2+/g | 106.12 ± 3.18 xvi | 142.84 ± 4.42 xvi,xvii | 206.11 ± 4.78 xviii |
a Averages ± standard deviations (SD) were obtained from five different experiments; b Values with different roman letters (i–xviii) indicate statistically significant differences among groups at p < 0.05 by one-way analysis of variance.