| Literature DB >> 29189734 |
Lei Yuan1, Zongquan Liu2, Zhenli Liu3, Xiao He4, Beiyue Ma5, Qiang Zhu6, Jingkun Yu7.
Abstract
A novel and aqueous gel-casting process has been successfully developed to fabricate porous MgAl₂O₄ ceramics by using hydratable alumina and MgO powders as raw materials and deionized water as hydration agent. The effects of different amounts of deionized water on the hydration properties, apparent porosity, bulk density, microstructure, pore size distribution and compressive strength of the samples were investigated. The results indicated that the porosity and the microstructure of porous MgAl₂O₄ ceramics were governed by the amounts of deionized water added. The porous structure was formed by the liberation of physisorbed water and the decomposition of hydration products such as bayerite, brucite and boehmite. After determining the addition amounts of deionized water, the fabricated porous MgAl₂O₄ ceramics had a high apparent porosity (52.5-65.8%), a small average pore size structure (around 1-3 μm) and a relatively high compressive strength (12-28 MPa). The novel aqueous gel-casting process with easy access is expected to be a promising candidate for the preparation of Al₂O₃-based porous ceramics.Entities:
Keywords: MgAl2O4; aqueous; gel-casting; hydratable alumina; porous ceramics
Year: 2017 PMID: 29189734 PMCID: PMC5744311 DOI: 10.3390/ma10121376
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Materials (Basel) ISSN: 1996-1944 Impact factor: 3.623
Ratios of raw materials of the samples (wt %).
| Samples | Starting Powders | Deionized Water | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ρ-Al2O3 | MgO | ||
| S1 | 37.0 | 13.0 | 50.0 |
| S2 | 29.6 | 10.4 | 60.0 |
| S3 | 24.6 | 8.7 | 66.7 |
| S4 | 21.2 | 7.4 | 71.4 |
Figure 1XRD patterns of the dried green bodies with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water: S1 (1:1); S2 (1:1.5); S3 (1:2) and S4 (1:2.5).
Figure 2TG-DSC curves of the dried green bodies with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water: S1 (1:1) and S4 (1:2.5).
Figure 3XRD patterns of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h.
Figure 4The apparent porosity and bulk density of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h.
Figure 5SEM images of fracture surface of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h: (S1) 1:1; (S2) 1:1.5; (S3) 1:2; (S4) 1:2.5.
Figure 6The pore size distribution of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water sintered at 1600 °C for 4 h.
Figure 7(a) Compressive strength and ideal compressive strength of the samples with different ratios of starting powders and deionized water; and (b) linear fitting of the relative compressive strength and relative density.