Literature DB >> 29189366

Role of Urine Drug Testing in the Current Opioid Epidemic.

Gagan Mahajan1.   

Abstract

While the evidence for urine drug testing for patients on chronic opioid therapy is weak, the guidelines created by numerous medical societies and state and federal regulatory agencies recommend that it be included as one of the tools used to monitor patients for compliance with chronic opioid therapy. To get the most comprehensive results, clinicians should order both an immunoassay screen and confirmatory urine drug test. The immunoassay screen, which can be performed as an in-office point-of-care test or as a laboratory-based test, is a cheap and convenient study to order. Limitations of an immunoassay screen, however, include having a high threshold of detectability and only providing qualitative information about a select number of drug classes. Because of these restrictions, clinicians should understand that immunoassay screens have high false-positive and false-negative rates. Despite these limitations, though, the results can assist the clinician with making preliminary treatment decisions. In comparison, a confirmatory urine drug test, which can only be performed as a laboratory-based test, has a lower threshold of detectability and provides both qualitative and quantitative information. A urine drug test's greater degree of specificity allows for a relatively low false-negative and false-positive rate in contrast to an immunoassay screen. Like any other diagnostic test, an immunoassay screen and a confirmatory urine drug test both possess limitations. Clinicians must keep this in mind when interpreting an unexpected test result and consult with their laboratory when in doubt about the meaning of the test result to avoid making erroneous decisions that negatively impact both the patient and clinician.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29189366     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002565

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  5 in total

1.  Trends in Urine Drug Testing Among Long-term Opioid Users, 2012-2018.

Authors:  Shaden A Taha; Jordan R Westra; Mukaila A Raji; Yong F Kuo
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 5.043

2.  Opioid moderatism and the imperative of rapprochement in pain medicine.

Authors:  Michael E Schatman; Alexis Vasciannie; Ronald J Kulich
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 3.133

3.  Spectral characteristics of urine from patients with end-stage kidney disease analyzed using Raman Chemometric Urinalysis (Rametrix).

Authors:  Ryan S Senger; Meaghan Sullivan; Austin Gouldin; Stephanie Lundgren; Kristen Merrifield; Caitlin Steen; Emily Baker; Tommy Vu; Ben Agnor; Gabrielle Martinez; Hana Coogan; William Carswell; Varun Kavuru; Lampros Karageorge; Devasmita Dev; Pang Du; Allan Sklar; James Pirkle; Susan Guelich; Giuseppe Orlando; John L Robertson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  A Difficult Challenge for the Clinical Laboratory: Accessing and Interpreting Manufacturer Cross-Reactivity Data for Immunoassays Used in Urine Drug Testing.

Authors:  Justine M Reschly-Krasowski; Matthew D Krasowski
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2018-11-21

5.  Evaluating the Effects of Opioid Prescribing Policies on Patient Outcomes in a Safety-net Primary Care Clinic.

Authors:  Christopher L Rowe; Kellene Eagen; Jennifer Ahern; Mark Faul; Alan Hubbard; Phillip Coffin
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 6.473

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.