Julie M Donohue1, Colleen L Barry, Elizabeth A Stuart, Shelly F Greenfield, Zirui Song, Michael E Chernew, Haiden A Huskamp. 1. University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, Pittsburgh, PA (JMD); Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD (CLB, EAS); McLean Hospital Belmont, MA (SFG); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (SFG); Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (ZS, MEC, HAH); and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (ZS).
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The Alternative Quality Contract (AQC) implemented in 2009 by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) is intended to improve quality and control costs by putting providers at risk for total medical spending and tying payment to performance on specified quality measures. We examined the AQC's early effects on use of and spending on medication treatment (MT) for addiction among individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and opioid use disorders (OUDs), conditions not subject to any performance measurement in the AQC. METHODS: Using data from 2006 to 2011, we use difference-in-difference estimation of the effect of the AQC on MT using a comparison group of enrollees in BCBSMA whose providers did not participate in the AQC. We compared AQC and non-AQC enrollees with AUDs (n = 37,113 person-years) and/or OUDs (n = 12,727 person-years) on any use of MT, number of prescriptions filled, and MT spending adjusting for demographic and health status characteristics. RESULTS: There was no difference in MT use among AQC enrollees with OUD (38.7%) relative to the comparison group (39.1%) (adjusted difference = -0.4%, 95% confidence interval -3.8% to 3.0%, P = 0.82). Likewise, there was no difference in MT use for AUD between the AQC (6.3%) and comparison group (6.5%) (P = 0.64). Similarly, we detected no differences in number of prescriptions or spending. CONCLUSIONS: Despite incentives for improved integration and quality of care under a global payment contract, the initial 3 years of the AQC showed no impact on MT use for AUD or OUD among privately insured enrollees with behavioral health benefits.
OBJECTIVES: The Alternative Quality Contract (AQC) implemented in 2009 by Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts (BCBSMA) is intended to improve quality and control costs by putting providers at risk for total medical spending and tying payment to performance on specified quality measures. We examined the AQC's early effects on use of and spending on medication treatment (MT) for addiction among individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) and opioid use disorders (OUDs), conditions not subject to any performance measurement in the AQC. METHODS: Using data from 2006 to 2011, we use difference-in-difference estimation of the effect of the AQC on MT using a comparison group of enrollees in BCBSMA whose providers did not participate in the AQC. We compared AQC and non-AQC enrollees with AUDs (n = 37,113 person-years) and/or OUDs (n = 12,727 person-years) on any use of MT, number of prescriptions filled, and MT spending adjusting for demographic and health status characteristics. RESULTS: There was no difference in MT use among AQC enrollees with OUD (38.7%) relative to the comparison group (39.1%) (adjusted difference = -0.4%, 95% confidence interval -3.8% to 3.0%, P = 0.82). Likewise, there was no difference in MT use for AUD between the AQC (6.3%) and comparison group (6.5%) (P = 0.64). Similarly, we detected no differences in number of prescriptions or spending. CONCLUSIONS: Despite incentives for improved integration and quality of care under a global payment contract, the initial 3 years of the AQC showed no impact on MT use for AUD or OUD among privately insured enrollees with behavioral health benefits.
Authors: Bradley D Stein; Rosalie Liccardo Pacula; Adam J Gordon; Rachel M Burns; Douglas L Leslie; Mark J Sorbero; Sebastian Bauhoff; Todd W Mandell; Andrew W Dick Journal: Milbank Q Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 4.911
Authors: Zirui Song; Sherri Rose; Dana G Safran; Bruce E Landon; Matthew P Day; Michael E Chernew Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-10-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Alex H S Harris; Constance M Weisner; Mady Chalk; Victor Capoccia; Cheng Chen; Cindy Parks Thomas Journal: J Addict Med Date: 2016 May-Jun Impact factor: 3.702
Authors: Paul J Fudala; T Peter Bridge; Susan Herbert; William O Williford; C Nora Chiang; Karen Jones; Joseph Collins; Dennis Raisch; Paul Casadonte; R Jeffrey Goldsmith; Walter Ling; Usha Malkerneker; Laura McNicholas; John Renner; Susan Stine; Donald Tusel Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst Journal: Health Care Financ Rev Date: 2004
Authors: Denise M Boudreau; Gwen Lapham; Eric A Johnson; Jennifer F Bobb; Abigail G Matthews; Jennifer McCormack; David Liu; Cynthia I Campbell; Rebecca C Rossom; Ingrid A Binswanger; Bobbi Jo Yarborough; Julia H Arnsten; Chinazo O Cunningham; Joseph E Glass; Mark T Murphy; Mohammad Zare; Rulin C Hechter; Brian Ahmedani; Jordan M Braciszewski; Viviana E Horigian; José Szapocznik; Jeffrey H Samet; Andrew J Saxon; Robert P Schwartz; Katharine A Bradley Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2020-03
Authors: Gwen Lapham; Denise M Boudreau; Eric A Johnson; Jennifer F Bobb; Abigail G Matthews; Jennifer McCormack; David Liu; Jeffrey H Samet; Andrew J Saxon; Cynthia I Campbell; Joseph E Glass; Rebecca C Rossom; Mark T Murphy; Ingrid A Binswanger; Bobbi Jo H Yarborough; Katharine A Bradley Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-11-15 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Brandy F Henry; Aimee Campbell; Timothy Hunt; Jessica K Johnson; Amar D Mandavia; Michael Chaple; Caroline Arout; Elwin Wu; Harold A Pincus; Edward V Nunes; Pat Lincourt; Frances R Levin; Nabila El-Bassel Journal: J Subst Abuse Treat Date: 2021-06-25
Authors: Alireza Boloori; Bengt B Arnetz; Frederi Viens; Taps Maiti; Judith E Arnetz Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-10-16 Impact factor: 3.390