OBJECTIVES:Fortified milk and resistance training (RT) increase muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults, but it remains unclear whether RT combined with aerobic training (AT) would have stronger effects on these outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of aerobic and resistance training (ART) combined with fortified milk consumption on muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults. DESIGN: Open-labeled randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University of Tsukuba. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six older adults aged 65-79. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly allocated into resistance training (RT + fortified milk, n = 28) and aerobic and resistance training (ART + fortified milk, n = 28) groups. All participants attended supervised exercise programs twice a week at University of Tsukuba and ingested fortified milk every day for 12 weeks. Skeletal muscle index ([SMI]: appendicular lean mass/height2) was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry as a muscle mass measure. One-repetition maximum strength was measured using four kinds of resistance training machines (chest press, leg extension, leg curl, and leg press) as muscle strength measures. Sit-to-stand and arm curl tests were also assessed as physical performance measures. MEASUREMENTS: The primary measurements were muscle mass and strength. The secondary outcomes were physical performance, blood samples, habitual diet, habitual physical activity, and medication use. RESULTS: Although the muscle strength and physical performance measures significantly improved in both groups, SMI significantly improved in only the RT group. There was no significant difference in the change in SMI and muscle strength measures between the two groups. However, the change in sit-to-stand and arm curl measures in the ART group were significantly higher than those in the RT group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that AT before RT combined with fortified milk consumption has similar effects on skeletal muscle mass and strength compared with RT alone, but it may be a more useful strategy to improve physical performance in older adults. Although the mechanism of our intervention is uncertain, our program would be an effective prevention for sarcopenia in older adults.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: Fortified milk and resistance training (RT) increase muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults, but it remains unclear whether RT combined with aerobic training (AT) would have stronger effects on these outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of aerobic and resistance training (ART) combined with fortified milk consumption on muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance in older adults. DESIGN: Open-labeled randomized controlled trial. SETTING: University of Tsukuba. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-six older adults aged 65-79. INTERVENTION: Participants were randomly allocated into resistance training (RT + fortified milk, n = 28) and aerobic and resistance training (ART + fortified milk, n = 28) groups. All participants attended supervised exercise programs twice a week at University of Tsukuba and ingested fortified milk every day for 12 weeks. Skeletal muscle index ([SMI]: appendicular lean mass/height2) was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry as a muscle mass measure. One-repetition maximum strength was measured using four kinds of resistance training machines (chest press, leg extension, leg curl, and leg press) as muscle strength measures. Sit-to-stand and arm curl tests were also assessed as physical performance measures. MEASUREMENTS: The primary measurements were muscle mass and strength. The secondary outcomes were physical performance, blood samples, habitual diet, habitual physical activity, and medication use. RESULTS: Although the muscle strength and physical performance measures significantly improved in both groups, SMI significantly improved in only the RT group. There was no significant difference in the change in SMI and muscle strength measures between the two groups. However, the change in sit-to-stand and arm curl measures in the ART group were significantly higher than those in the RT group. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that AT before RT combined with fortified milk consumption has similar effects on skeletal muscle mass and strength compared with RT alone, but it may be a more useful strategy to improve physical performance in older adults. Although the mechanism of our intervention is uncertain, our program would be an effective prevention for sarcopenia in older adults.
Authors: Satoshi Fujita; Blake B Rasmussen; Jerson G Cadenas; Micah J Drummond; Erin L Glynn; Fred R Sattler; Elena Volpi Journal: Diabetes Date: 2007-03-09 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Tabatha A Elliot; Melanie G Cree; Arthur P Sanford; Robert R Wolfe; Kevin D Tipton Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2006-04 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Ian Janssen; Richard N Baumgartner; Robert Ross; Irwin H Rosenberg; Ronenn Roubenoff Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-02-15 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Blake B Rasmussen; Satoshi Fujita; Robert R Wolfe; Bettina Mittendorfer; Mona Roy; Vincent L Rowe; Elena Volpi Journal: FASEB J Date: 2006-02-07 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Moritz Schumann; Joshua F Feuerbacher; Marvin Sünkeler; Nils Freitag; Bent R Rønnestad; Kenji Doma; Tommy R Lundberg Journal: Sports Med Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Christopher Hurst; Lorelle Dismore; Antoneta Granic; Terry Aspray; Emma Stevenson; Miles D Witham; Avan A Sayer; Sian Robinson Journal: Clin Interv Aging Date: 2020-05-20 Impact factor: 4.458