Literature DB >> 29188686

Having our yards and sharing them too: the collective effects of yards on native bird species in an urban landscape.

J Amy Belaire, Christopher J Whelan, Emily S Minor.   

Abstract

Residential yards comprise a substantial portion of urban landscapes, and the collective effects of the management of many individual yards may “scale up” to affect urban biodiversity. We conducted bird surveys and social surveys in Chicago-area (Illinois, USA) residential neighborhoods to identify the relative importance of yard design and management activities for native birds. We found that groups of neighboring yards, in the aggregate, were more important for native bird species richness than environmental characteristics at the neighborhood or landscape scale. The ratio of evergreen to deciduous trees in yards and the percentage of yards with trees and plants with fruits or berries were positively associated with native bird species richness, whereas the number of outdoor cats had a negative association. The number of birdfeeders was not an important predictor for native species richness. We also found that migratory birds were observed on transects with more wildlife-friendly features in yards, and nonnative birds were observed on transects with greater numbers of outdoor cats and dogs. Our results highlight the potential importance of residential matrix management as a conservation strategy in urban areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 29188686     DOI: 10.1890/13-2259.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  9 in total

1.  Bird-window collisions: Mitigation efficacy and risk factors across two years.

Authors:  Barbara B Brown; Sabrina Santos; Natalia Ocampo-Peñuela
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.061

Review 2.  Human-nature interactions and the consequences and drivers of provisioning wildlife.

Authors:  Daniel T C Cox; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 6.671

3.  The traits that predict the magnitude and spatial scale of forest bird responses to urbanization intensity.

Authors:  Grant D Paton; Alexandra V Shoffner; Andrew M Wilson; Sara A Gagné
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 4.  Efficacy-based and normative interventions for facilitating the diffusion of conservation behavior through social networks.

Authors:  Rebecca Niemiec; Megan S Jones; Stacy Lischka; Veronica Champine
Journal:  Conserv Biol       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 7.563

5.  Habitat provision is a major driver of native bird communities in restored urban forests.

Authors:  Elizabeth Elliot Noe; John Innes; Andrew D Barnes; Chaitanya Joshi; Bruce D Clarkson
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 5.606

6.  Avian Assemblages at Bird Baths: A Comparison of Urban and Rural Bird Baths in Australia.

Authors:  Gráinne P Cleary; Holly Parsons; Adrian Davis; Bill R Coleman; Darryl N Jones; Kelly K Miller; Michael A Weston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.752

7.  Vegetation communities on commercial developments are heterogenous and determined by development and landscaping decisions, not socioeconomics.

Authors:  Karen Dyson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 3.752

8.  The importance of street trees to urban avifauna.

Authors:  Eric M Wood; Sevan Esaian
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 6.105

9.  The Biological Deserts Fallacy: Cities in Their Landscapes Contribute More than We Think to Regional Biodiversity.

Authors:  Erica N Spotswood; Erin E Beller; Robin Grossinger; J Letitia Grenier; Nicole E Heller; Myla F J Aronson
Journal:  Bioscience       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 11.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.