N J Curtis1,2, M Taylor1, L Fraser1, E Salib3, E Noble1, R Hipkiss1, A S Allison1, R Dalton1, J B Ockrim1, Nader K Francis4,5. 1. Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, Somerset, BA21 4AT, UK. 2. Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Praed Street, London, W2 1NY, UK. 3. Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Brownlow Hill, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7ZX, UK. 4. Yeovil District Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Higher Kingston, Yeovil, Somerset, BA21 4AT, UK. nader.francis@ydh.nhs.uk. 5. Faculty of Science, Wessex House, Calverton Down, University of Bath, Bath, Somerset, BA2 7AY, UK. nader.francis@ydh.nhs.uk.
Abstract
AIM: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes and laparoscopic techniques both provide short-term benefits to patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. ERAS protocol compliance may improve long-term survival in those undergoing open colorectal resection but as laparoscopic data has not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of the combination of laparoscopy and ERAS management on 5-year overall survival. METHODS: A dedicated prospectively populated colorectal cancer surgery database was reviewed. Patient inclusion criteria were biopsy-proven colorectal adenocarcinoma, undergoing elective surgery undertaken with curative intent. All patients were managed within an established ERAS programme and routinely followed up for 5 years. Overall survival was measured using the log-rank Kaplan-Meier method at 5 years. RESULTS: Eight hundred fifty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Four hundred eighty-one (56%) cases were laparoscopic with 98 patients (20%) requiring conversion. There were no differences in patient or tumour demographics between the surgical groups. Median ERAS protocol compliance was 93% (range 53-100%). Five-year overall survival was superior in laparoscopic cases compared with that of converted and open surgery (78 vs 68 vs 70%, respectively, p < 0.007). An open approach (HR 1.55, 95%CI 1.16-2.06, p = 0.002) and delayed hospital discharge (> 7 days, HR 1.5, 95%CI 1.13-1.9, p = 0.003) were the only modifiable risk factors associated with poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a laparoscopic approach with enhanced recovery after surgery management appears to have long-term survival benefits following colorectal cancer resection.
AIM: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes and laparoscopic techniques both provide short-term benefits to patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. ERAS protocol compliance may improve long-term survival in those undergoing open colorectal resection but as laparoscopic data has not been reported. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the impact of the combination of laparoscopy and ERAS management on 5-year overall survival. METHODS: A dedicated prospectively populated colorectal cancer surgery database was reviewed. Patient inclusion criteria were biopsy-proven colorectal adenocarcinoma, undergoing elective surgery undertaken with curative intent. All patients were managed within an established ERAS programme and routinely followed up for 5 years. Overall survival was measured using the log-rank Kaplan-Meier method at 5 years. RESULTS: Eight hundred fifty-four patients met the inclusion criteria. Four hundred eighty-one (56%) cases were laparoscopic with 98 patients (20%) requiring conversion. There were no differences in patient or tumour demographics between the surgical groups. Median ERAS protocol compliance was 93% (range 53-100%). Five-year overall survival was superior in laparoscopic cases compared with that of converted and open surgery (78 vs 68 vs 70%, respectively, p < 0.007). An open approach (HR 1.55, 95%CI 1.16-2.06, p = 0.002) and delayed hospital discharge (> 7 days, HR 1.5, 95%CI 1.13-1.9, p = 0.003) were the only modifiable risk factors associated with poor survival. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a laparoscopic approach with enhanced recovery after surgery management appears to have long-term survival benefits following colorectal cancer resection.
Entities:
Keywords:
ERAS; Enhanced recovery; Laparoscopy; Long term; Survival
Authors: A A F A Veenhof; M S Vlug; M H G M van der Pas; C Sietses; D L van der Peet; E S M de Lange-de Klerk; H J Bonjer; W A Bemelman; M A Cuesta Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Malaika S Vlug; Jan Wind; Markus W Hollmann; Dirk T Ubbink; Huib A Cense; Alexander F Engel; Michael F Gerhards; Bart A van Wagensveld; Edwin S van der Zaag; Anna A W van Geloven; Mirjam A G Sprangers; Miguel A Cuesta; Willem A Bemelman Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2011-12 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Michelle L Ramanathan; Graham MacKay; Jonathan Platt; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2014-09-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: S A L Bartels; M S Vlug; M W Hollmann; M G W Dijkgraaf; D T Ubbink; H A Cense; B A van Wagensveld; A F Engel; M F Gerhards; W A Bemelman Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2014-06-30 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Lawrence Lee; Nathalie Wong-Chong; Justin J Kelly; George J Nassif; Matthew R Albert; John R T Monson Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Marlen Haderlein; Sebastian Lettmaier; Melanie Langheinrich; Axel Schmid; Sabine Semrau; Markus Hecht; Michael Beck; Daniela Schmidt; Robert Grützmann; Rainer Fietkau; Axel Denz Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 2.571