Literature DB >> 29188352

[Prospective DRG coding : Improvement in cost-effectiveness and documentation quality of in-patient hospital care].

S Geuss1, A Jungmeister2, A Baumgart3, R Seelos4, S Ockert4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In prospective reimbursement schemes a diagnosis-related group (DRG) is assigned to each case according to all coded diagnoses and procedures. This process can be conducted retrospectively after (DC) or prospectively during the hospitalization (PC). The use of PC offers advantages in terms of cost-effectiveness and documentation quality without impairing patient safety.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis including all DRG records and billing data from 2012 to 2015 of a surgical department was carried out. The use of PC was introduced into the vascular surgery unit (VS) in September 2013, while the remaining surgical units (RS) stayed with DC. Analysis focused on differences between VS and RS before and after introduction of PC. Characteristics of cost-effectiveness were earnings (EBIT-DA), length of stay (LOS), the case mix index (CMI) and the productivity in relation to the DRG benchmark (productivity index, PI). The number of recorded diagnoses/procedures (ND/NP) was an indicator for documentation quality.
RESULTS: A total of 1703 cases with VS and 27,679 cases with RS were analyzed. After introduction of PC the EBIT-DA per case increased in VS but not in RS (+3342 Swiss francs vs. +84, respectively, p < 0.001). The CMI increased slightly in both groups (+0.10 VS vs. +0.08 RS, p > 0.05) and the LOS was more reduced in VS than in RS (-0.36 days vs. -0.03 days, p > 0.005). The PI increased in VS but decreased in RS (+0.131 vs. -0.032, p < 0.001), ND increased more in VS (+1.29 VS vs. +0.26 RS, p < 0.001) and NP remained stable in both groups.
CONCLUSION: The use of PC helps to significantly improve cost-effectiveness and documentation quality of in-patient hospital care, essentially by optimizing LOS and cost weight in relation to the DRG benchmark, i. e. increasing the PI. The increasing ND indicates an improvement in documentation quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Coding quality; DRG; Documentation quality; Medical controlling; Prospective coding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29188352     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0555-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  6 in total

1.  [Quality management and strategic consequences of assessing documentation and coding under the German Diagnostic Related Groups system].

Authors:  M Schnabel; D Mann; T Efe; M Schrappe; T V Garrel; L Gotzen; M Schaeg
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  Financial impact of introducing the Swiss-DRG reimbursement system on potentially avoidable readmissions at a university hospital.

Authors:  Jean-Blaise Wasserfallen; Jade Zufferey
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.193

3.  The health information technology workforce: estimations of demands and a framework for requirements.

Authors:  W Hersh
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  [The DRG responsible physician in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Surgeon, encoder, and link to medical controlling].

Authors:  T Ruffing; P Huchzermeier; M Muhm; H Winkler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Quality of care before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system. A summary of effects.

Authors:  W H Rogers; D Draper; K L Kahn; E B Keeler; L V Rubenstein; J Kosecoff; R H Brook
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-10-17       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  [Ethics and diagnosis related groups].

Authors:  C Lenk; N Biller-Andorno; B Alt-Epping; M Anders; C Wiesemann
Journal:  Dtsch Med Wochenschr       Date:  2005-07-08       Impact factor: 0.628

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.