Yao-Wen Cheng1, Kumar Sandrasegaran2, Katherine Cheng3, Angela Shah2, Marwan Ghabril1, William Berry2, Craig Lammert1, Naga Chalasani1, Eric S Orman4. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Rotary Circle, Suite 225, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA. 3. Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, USA. 4. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, 702 Rotary Circle, Suite 225, Indianapolis, IN, 46202, USA. esorman@iu.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to describe the effect of a dedicated paracentesis clinic on healthcare utilization by patients with decompensated cirrhosis and refractory ascites. METHODS: This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study identified cirrhotic patients receiving paracenteses over a 6-month period before and after creating the paracentesis clinic. Patients were followed for 12 months to collect outcome data including characteristics of subsequent hospitalizations and paracenteses. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between the paracentesis clinic and outcomes. RESULTS: There were 183 patients and 1364 paracenteses performed during the study time period. Age, gender, cirrhosis etiology, MELD, Child-Pugh, and Charlson comorbidity index were comparable between the two groups. Rates of mortality, transplant, and hospitalization were also similar during 1 year follow-up. After establishment of the paracentesis clinic, median paracenteses per patient increased from 2 (IQR 1-7) to 4 (IQR 2-11) (P = 0.01); albumin replacement after paracenteses ≥ 5 L improved from 76.3% to 91.7% (P < 0.001); and the fraction of outpatient paracenteses performed in the emergency department decreased from 13.4% to 3.8% (P < 0.001). Major complications remained negligible at 0.81% across both time periods. While fewer patients were admitted for ascites after the paracentesis clinic (39.6% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.009), more patients had acute kidney injury (AKI) during follow-up (47.2% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.02), with a trend towards more AKI admissions (22.6% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: A dedicated paracentesis clinic can improve access and wait times, while also reducing admissions for ascites and paracenteses performed in the emergency department.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to describe the effect of a dedicated paracentesis clinic on healthcare utilization by patients with decompensated cirrhosis and refractory ascites. METHODS: This Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study identified cirrhotic patients receiving paracenteses over a 6-month period before and after creating the paracentesis clinic. Patients were followed for 12 months to collect outcome data including characteristics of subsequent hospitalizations and paracenteses. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between the paracentesis clinic and outcomes. RESULTS: There were 183 patients and 1364 paracenteses performed during the study time period. Age, gender, cirrhosis etiology, MELD, Child-Pugh, and Charlson comorbidity index were comparable between the two groups. Rates of mortality, transplant, and hospitalization were also similar during 1 year follow-up. After establishment of the paracentesis clinic, median paracenteses per patient increased from 2 (IQR 1-7) to 4 (IQR 2-11) (P = 0.01); albumin replacement after paracenteses ≥ 5 L improved from 76.3% to 91.7% (P < 0.001); and the fraction of outpatient paracenteses performed in the emergency department decreased from 13.4% to 3.8% (P < 0.001). Major complications remained negligible at 0.81% across both time periods. While fewer patients were admitted for ascites after the paracentesis clinic (39.6% vs. 20.8%, P = 0.009), more patients had acute kidney injury (AKI) during follow-up (47.2% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.02), with a trend towards more AKI admissions (22.6% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.09). CONCLUSION: A dedicated paracentesis clinic can improve access and wait times, while also reducing admissions for ascites and paracenteses performed in the emergency department.
Authors: P Ginès; L Titó; V Arroyo; R Planas; J Panés; J Viver; M Torres; P Humbert; A Rimola; J Llach Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1988-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Pere Ginès; Juan Uriz; Blas Calahorra; Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao; Patrick S Kamath; Luis Ruiz Del Arbol; Ramón Planas; Jaime Bosch; Vicente Arroyo; Juan Rodés Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: P S Kamath; R H Wiesner; M Malinchoc; W Kremers; T M Therneau; C L Kosberg; G D'Amico; E R Dickson; W R Kim Journal: Hepatology Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Christophe Bureau; Dominique Thabut; Frédéric Oberti; Sébastien Dharancy; Nicolas Carbonell; Antoine Bouvier; Philippe Mathurin; Philippe Otal; Pauline Cabarrou; Jean Marie Péron; Jean Pierre Vinel Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 22.682