Literature DB >> 29188316

Impact of Bicuspid Aortic Valve Morphology on Aortic Valve Disease and Aortic Dilation in Pediatric Patients.

Rebekah M Ward1, Jordan M Marsh2, Jeffrey M Gossett1,2, Mallikarjuna R Rettiganti1,2, R Thomas Collins3,4.   

Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most common congenital heart defect. BAV is associated with aortic stenosis and insufficiency, and aortic dilation in adult groups, but data in pediatric groups are limited. We sought to assess the impact of BAV morphology on aortic valve disease and aortic dilation in pediatric patients. We performed a retrospective review of all echocardiograms in patients with isolated BAV who were followed at our institution from July 2002 to July 2012. BAV morphology, aortic valve stenosis and/or insufficiency, and aortic dimensions were measured manually. Comparisons were made between right-left cusp fusion (RL) and right-noncoronary cusp fusion (RN) BAV morphologies. Generalized least square models were fit to analyze the impact of specific variables on aortic dilation. There were 1075 echocardiograms in 366 patients (72% male) with isolated BAV. Aortic valve insufficiency and stenosis were more common in RN (p < 0.001 for both). The median aortic sinus Z score was higher in the RL (0.47; IQR - 0.31 to 1.44) than in the RN group (0.02; - 0.83 to 0.82) (p < 0.001). There was no difference in median ascending aorta Z score between groups. Patients with the highest weights had larger aortas (p < 0.001), but the absolute difference between the highest and lowest weight groups was small (1.5 mm). The impact of BAV morphology on aortic valve disease and aortic dilation in pediatric patients presages that seen in adults. Patient body weight does not make significant clinical impacts on aortic diameters, suggesting that Z scores for aortic diameters should be based on ideal body weights.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aortic dilation; Aortic insufficiency; Aortic stenosis; Bicuspid aortic valve; Pediatrics; Weight

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29188316     DOI: 10.1007/s00246-017-1781-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol        ISSN: 0172-0643            Impact factor:   1.655


  43 in total

1.  Familial thoracic aortic dilation and bicommissural aortic valve: a prospective analysis of natural history and inheritance.

Authors:  Melissa L Loscalzo; Denise L M Goh; Bart Loeys; Kathleen C Kent; Philip J Spevak; Harry C Dietz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 2.802

2.  Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.

Authors:  Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 6.317

3.  A prospective study to assess the frequency of familial clustering of congenital bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  K Huntington; A G Hunter; K L Chan
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Aortic dilatation with bicuspid aortic valves: cusp fusion correlates to matrix metalloproteinases and inhibitors.

Authors:  John S Ikonomidis; Jean Marie Ruddy; Stewart M Benton; Jazmine Arroyo; Theresa A Brinsa; Robert E Stroud; Ahmed Zeeshan; Joseph E Bavaria; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Francis G Spinale; Jeffrey A Jones
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-12-28       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Morphology and function of the bicuspid aortic valve with and without coarctation of the aorta in the young.

Authors:  Giovanna R Ciotti; Antonios P Vlahos; Norman H Silverman
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2006-08-31       Impact factor: 2.778

6.  Echocardiographic measurements in normal subjects from infancy to old age.

Authors:  W L Henry; J M Gardin; J H Ware
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Incidence of aortic complications in patients with bicuspid aortic valves.

Authors:  Hector I Michelena; Amber D Khanna; Douglas Mahoney; Edit Margaryan; Yan Topilsky; Rakesh M Suri; Ben Eidem; William D Edwards; Thoralf M Sundt; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Outcome of isolated bicuspid aortic valve in childhood.

Authors:  William T Mahle; James L Sutherland; Patricio A Frias
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 4.406

Review 9.  The bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Alan C Braverman; Hasan Güven; Michael A Beardslee; Majesh Makan; Andrew M Kates; Marc R Moon
Journal:  Curr Probl Cardiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.200

10.  Clinical outcome, valve dysfunction, and progressive aortic dilation in a pediatric population with isolated bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  Gaia Spaziani; Piercarlo Ballo; Silvia Favilli; Veronica Fibbi; Lorenzo Buonincontri; Iva Pollini; Alfredo Zuppiroli; Enrico Chiappa
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-21       Impact factor: 1.655

View more
  2 in total

1.  Clinical-pathological correlations of BAV and the attendant thoracic aortopathies. Part 1: Pluridisciplinary perspective on their hemodynamics and morphomechanics.

Authors:  Ares Pasipoularides
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 5.000

2.  First-Degree Relatives Screening of Patients with Bicuspid Aortic Valve: Effectiveness and Feasibility in Pediatric Cardiology Daily Practice.

Authors:  Claire Massardier; Florence Desroches; Narcisse Singbo; Jean-Marc Côté; Christian Drolet; Christine Houde; Laurence Vaujois; Philippe Chetaille
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 1.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.