Literature DB >> 29188274

Which Preschool Children With Specific Language Impairment Receive Language Intervention?

Kacie Wittke1, Tammie J Spaulding1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Potential biases in service provision for preschool children with specific language impairment (SLI) were explored. Method: In Study 1, children with SLI receiving treatment (SLI-T) and those with SLI not receiving treatment (SLI-NT) were compared on demographic characteristics and developmental abilities. Study 2 recruited children with articulation disorders receiving treatment (ARTIC-T) to determine if knowing service provision status influenced the results of Study 1.
Results: In Study 1, the SLI-T group was rated by teachers as having poorer executive functioning than children in the SLIT-NT group, and the SLI-T group also came from families whose mothers had more education. These 2 variables alone predicted SLI-T and SLI-NT group membership with 84% accuracy. In Study 2, the ARTIC-T group were perceived as having comparable executive functioning to the SLI-NT group and better than the SLI-T group, indicating that teachers' knowledge of service provision did not influence their ratings of children's executive functioning. Discussion: Preschool children with SLI, whose mothers have higher education levels and whose teachers perceive them as having poorer executive functioning, are more likely to receive intervention. Recognizing service delivery biases is critical for improving early provision of intervention for this population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29188274     DOI: 10.1044/2017_LSHSS-17-0024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch        ISSN: 0161-1461            Impact factor:   2.983


  7 in total

1.  The Relationship Between Language and Planning in Children With Language Impairment.

Authors:  Caroline Larson; Ishanti Gangopadhyay; Margarita Kaushanskaya; Susan Ellis Weismer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Identifying Children at Risk for Developmental Language Disorder Using a Brief, Whole-Classroom Screen.

Authors:  Alison Eisel Hendricks; Suzanne M Adlof; Crystle N Alonzo; Annie B Fox; Tiffany P Hogan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Comparison of the Diagnostic Evaluation of Language Variation-Screening Test Risk Subtest to Two Other Screeners for Low-Income Prekindergartners Who Speak African American English and Live in the Urban South.

Authors:  Christy Wynn Moland; Janna B Oetting
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 4.018

4.  Redmond (2002) Revisited: Have Standardized Behavioral Rating Scales Gotten Better at Accommodating for Overlapping Symptoms with Language Impairment?

Authors:  Sean M Redmond; Kirsten M Hannig; Amy Wilder
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 1.761

5.  Parents' sensemaking processes in the identification of developmental delays and engagement with early intervention services.

Authors:  Courtney L Scherr; Hannah J Getachew-Smith; Laura Sudec; John J Brooks; Megan Roberts
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Sentence Recall and Past Tense Measures for Identifying Children's Language Impairments.

Authors:  Sean M Redmond; Andrea C Ash; Tyler T Christopulos; Theresa Pfaff
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-06-20       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 7.  How We Fail Children With Developmental Language Disorder.

Authors:  Karla K McGregor
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.983

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.