Literature DB >> 29188205

Recurred Intracranial Meningioma: A Retrospective Analysis for Treatment Outcome and Prognostic Factor.

Hyun-Seung Ryu1, Kyung-Sub Moon1, Kyung-Hwa Lee2, Woo-Youl Jang1, Tae-Young Jung1, In-Young Kim1, Shin Jung1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to compare repeated resection and radiation treatment, such as Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) or conventional radiotherapy (RT), and investigate the factors influencing treatment outcome, including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and complication rates.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 67 cases of recurred intracranial meningiomas (repeated resection: 36 cases, radiation treatment: 31 cases) with 56 months of the median follow-up duration (range, 13-294 months).
RESULTS: The incidence of death rate was 29.9% over follow-up period after treatment for recurred meningiomas (20/67). As independent predictable factors for OS, benign pathology [hazard ratio (HR) 0.132, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.048-0.362, p<0.001] and tumor size <3 cm (HR 0.167, 95% CI 0.061-0.452, p<0.001) were significantly associated with a longer OS. The incidence of progression rate was 23.9% (16/67). Only treatment modality was important for PFS as an independent predictable factor (GKRS/RT vs. open resection; HR 0.117, 95% CI 0.027-0.518, p<0.005). The complication rate was 14.9% in our study (10/67). Larger tumor size (≥3 cm, HR 0.060, 95% CI 0.007-0.509, p=0.010) was significant as an independent prognostic factor for development of complications. Although treatment modality was not included for multivariate analysis, it should be considered as a predictable factor for complications (p=0.001 in univariate analysis).
CONCLUSION: The role of repeated resection is questionable for recurred intracranial meningiomas, considering high progression and complication rates. Frequent and regular imaging follow-up is required to detect recurred tumor sized as small as possible, and radiation treatment can be a preferred treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intracranial meningioma; Radiosurgery; Recurrent brain tumor; Reoperation; Treatment outcome

Year:  2017        PMID: 29188205      PMCID: PMC5700028          DOI: 10.14791/btrt.2017.5.2.54

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Tumor Res Treat        ISSN: 2288-2405


INTRODUCTION

Meningioma has the second highest incidence rate among primary tumors occurring in the central nervous system (CNS), comprising 13–16% of intracranial tumors [12]. Based on the fourth classification of World Health Organization (WHO) in 2007, 92% of meningiomas are divided into benign tumors (WHO grade I) that grows comparatively slowly [345]. They arise from the arachnoid “cap” cells of the arachnoid villi in the meninges and typically attached to the dural broad base [6]. Some of them invade skull or cause hyperostosis to subjacent bone. Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) is recognized as a good treatment option for relatively small meningioma with actuarial tumor control rate of 97.9% at 5 years post-GKRS [7]. However, complete surgical removal (Simpson grade I–III) remains the first treatment option of meningioma despite recurrence can be occur in histologically benign meningiomas on macroscopic total resection and removal of dural attachment and abnormal bone (Simpson grade I). Nanda et al. [8] revealed that, in benign meningioma, the recurrence rate in Simpson grades 0/I group was 2.9%, otherwise in Simpson grades II–IV group, the recurrence rate was 31%. Furthermore, the pathological grade is also important for prediction of recurrence. In atypical meningioma, the overall recurrence rate in Simpson grades I/II resection was 31%. In grades III/IV, the overall recurrence rate was 73%, and this high recurrence rate in these groups was confined within 5 years. Despite high clinical relevance of recurrence, the proper strategy for the diagnosis and treatment of recurred meningiomas has not been fully established. In the present study, we analyzed treatment outcomes of patients with recurred meningiomas to determine the predictors for survival, progression and postoperative complications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the hospital (CNUHH-2017-97) and written informed consent was obtained from patients or their legal surrogates for using clinical data. A retrospective study was performed on 884 patients who received surgery and were histopathologically confirmed as a meningioma in our hospital from June 1993 to November 2011. Of the 884 meningioma patients, 75 patients (8.5%) were treated as recurrent meningiomas. Some patients who had partial uncertain or omitted records were excluded and finally 67 cases were enrolled in the study; open resection (n=36), radiation treatment [GKRS or conventional radiotherapy (RT), n=31].

Treatment

The location and size of the craniotomy was determined for each case, and navigation system was introduced to correctly localize the tumors. In some cases, the feeding vessels and tumor vascularity were evaluated by cerebral angiography before surgery. In the cases with high bleeding risk, preoperative embolization was conducted to minimize the hemorrhage during surgery and ease resection of the tumor. Whenever possible, gross total resection (GTR) with removal or coagulation of involved dura mater was attempted. However, remnant tumor was inevitable in case in which it had invaded the venous sinus or when it was very adherent to the cranial nerves, cerebral arteries and functionally important cortex. GKRS was performed with the Leksell Gamma Knife (model C or Perfexion, Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). The median maximal dose was 26.5 Gy (range, 18–36 Gy), with a median marginal tumor dose of 13.2 Gy (range, 9–18 Gy) at the 45–50% isodose line.

Analysis variables

The clinical and radiological data of the enrolled patients were retrospectively reviewed. Clinicoradiological factors including, age, sex, location, size, perilesional edema, calcification, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics, Simpson grade, initial neurologic symptoms, and pathology were retrospectively analyzed. The size of the tumor indicates the maximal diameter on 3-dimensional T1-weighted MR images with enhancement. Peritumoral edema, evaluated by axial T2-weighted MR images, were used to classify the patients into 2 groups [none or mild (<5 mm in edema thickness) vs. moderate to severe (≥5 mm in edema thickness)]. The extent of tumor resection was classified in accordance with the Simpson's classification. Simpson's grade I or II resection without remnant tumor on follow-up MR imaging was defined as GTR. WHO classification system was applied for pathological grade for all tumors. Newly-developed neurological deficits or aggravated pre-existing deficits after treatment were regarded as treatment-related complications. In this study, we defined the complication as permanent neurologic deficit or sequelae, not transient. If the problem persisted longer than 6 months or needed subsequent surgical operation, it was regarded as a permanent complication. To evaluate tumor recurrence, postoperative follow-up MR imaging was obtained from all patients 6 months after surgery and then annual imaging for the rest of the patient's life. On follow-up MR imaging, a newly-enhanced mass in a completely resected case or a re-growing symptomatic mass in an incompletely resected case was regarded as progression.

Statistical analysis

Overall survival (OS) was calculated from the date of treatment of recurrence until death, or until the date of the last visiting for patients who were still alive. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates calculated from date of treatment for recurrence to date of first recurrence in complete resection case or regrowth in remnant case, or last follow-up in patients with no recurrence or regrowth were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. For the multivariate analysis, independent prognostic factors were determined using the Cox's proportional hazards model. The comparison of a permanent complication occurrence and a categorical variable was done by a Chi-square test or Fisher-exact probability test. Furthermore, binary logistic regression test was applied for multivariate analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 20.0 for Windows (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA); p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patient's characteristics

Clinicoradiological characteristics of the enrolled 67 patients with recurred meningiomas are summarized in Table 1. Several features at initial operation were also analyzed. Poor resection margin between tumor and normal arachnoid was noted in 27 patients (40.2%) and GTR (Simpson grade I/II) was performed in 48 patients (71.7%). In WHO classification, majority of the patients (42/67, 62.7%) were diagnosed as a WHO grade I. Multi-lobulated tumor was documented in 31 patients (46.2%).
Table 1

Clinicoradiological characteristics of 67 patients with recurred meningiomas

CharacteristicNo. of patients (%)
Age (years)
 Median (range)55.7 (27–89 yrs)
 <6556 (83.6)
 ≥6511 (16.4)
Sex
 Male27 (40)
 Female40 (60)
Initial pathology (WHO grade)
 Benign42 (62.7)
 Atypical21 (31.3)
 Anaplastic4 (6.0)
Initial resection (Simpson grade)
 Grade I17 (25.4)
 Grade II31 (46.3)
 Grade III14 (20.9)
 Grade IV5 (7.4)
Resection margin (initial operation)
 Poor27 (40.2)
 Good40 (59.8)
Multi-lobulation (initial operation)
 No36 (53.8)
 Yes31 (46.2)
Initial postoperative complication
 No47 (70.1)
 Yes20 (30.9)
Type of symptom at recurrence
 Headache & dizziness8 (11.9)
 Cranial nerve symptom13 (19.4)
 Gait disturbance3 (4.5)
 Motor & mental change7 (10.4)
 None36 (53.8)
Size (cm)
 Mean (range)2.1 (0.3–10.8 cm)
 <338 (56.2)
 ≥329 (43.2)
Edema
 None or mild56 (83.5)
 Moderate to severe11 (16.5)
Location
 Anterior or middle skull base23 (34.3)
 Posterior skull base or infratentorial9 (13.4)
 Convexity12 (17.9)
 Adjacent sinus or falx23 (34.3)
T2 intensity
 High/Iso56 (83.5)
 Low11 (16.5)
Treatment
 Open resection36 (53.8)
 Radiosurgery/radiotherapy31 (46.2)
Follow up duration (months)
 Median (range)56 (13–294 months)
Progression after treatment for recurred lesion
 No51 (76.1)
 Yes16 (23.9)
Postoperative complication
 No57 (85.0)
 Panhypopituitarysm1 (1.5)
 Mental deepening1 (1.5)
 Tremor1 (1.5)
 Visual defect1 (1.5)
 Hemorrhage2 (3.0)
 Hydrocephalus2 (3.0)
 Wound infection2 (3.0)
On 2nd treatment, the mean tumor size was 2.1 cm and 29 cases were larger than 3 cm. Most commonly, parasagittal (20.8%), convexity (17.9%), and sphenoidal ridge (11.9%) meningiomas were accounted. Thirty-one patients showed symptoms at recurrence, with headache or dizziness in 8 patients, and cranial nerve symptoms in 13 patients. Median follow-up duration was 56 months (range, 13–294 months). On T2-weighted MR images, 11 cases showed low signal intensity and 11 cases revealed moderate to severe peritumoral edema formation.

Overall survival

The incidence of death rate was 29.9% over follow-up period after treatment for recurred meningiomas (20/67). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year survival rates were 73.1, 70.1, and 70.1%, respectively (Fig. 1A). The results of analyses of the variables correlated with OS are shown in Fig. 1B-F and Table 2.
Fig. 1

Kaplan-Meier curves showing OS of 67 study patients based on different predictors (overall comparison was estimated using a log-rank test). The number on right lower in each curve represents the p-value. A: Entire patients. B: WHO grade. C: Location. D: Size of tumor. E: Treatment modality for recurrence. F: Postoperative complication. OS, overall survival; GKRS, Gamma knife radiosurgery; RT, radiotherapy.

Table 2

Univariate and multivariate analyses for overall survival from the treatment for recurred meningiomas

VariableSurvivalUnivariateMultivariate
Mean duration±SD (months)p-valueHR95% CIp-value
Age (years)0.5010.097
 <65128±10.8
 ≥6581.1±10.3
Sex0.2130.307
 Male94.5±12.2
 Female131.7±11.4
Initial postop complication0.1550.811
 None or transient133.1±10.7
 Permanent92±13.2
Location0.0140.903
 Non-convexity133.5±9.7
 Convexity61.8±16.6
Initial pathology (WHO grade)<0.0010.1320.048–0.362<0.001
 Benign148.4±9.6
 Atypical or anaplastic71.9±12.0
Initial resection (Simpson grade)0.4720.840
 Grade I, II126.6±10.6
 Grade III, IV95±14.7
Initial resection margin0.1200.104
 Good135.7±11.0
 Poor94±13.2
Initial multi-lobulation0.5200.841
 No132.1±9.6
 Yes98.2±10.4
Size at recurrence (cm)0.0030.1670.061–0.452<0.001
 <3146.7±10.1
 ≥381.5±11.9
Symptom at recurrence0.0990.609
 No133.7±11.0
 Yes92.7±13.8
Edema at recurrence0.5260.495
 No or mild128±10.3
 Moderate to severe95.7±15.4
T2 intensity at recurrence0.3960.152
 High or Iso120.2±10.3
 Low118.9±15.7
Treatment at recurrence0.0970.378
 Open resection110.1±13.3
 Radiosurgery/radiotherapy119.1±9.4
Postoperative complication0.0110.655
 No132.3±9.6
 Yes44.1±9.6

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval

On univariate analysis, initial pathology, location, size, and postoperative complication showed statistical significance. The more aggressive pathology group (WHO grade II/III) manifested a shorter survival time than the benign group (71.9±12.0 months vs. 148.4±9.6 months, p<0.001). The tumor location was influential factor for survival time [61.8±16.6 months (convexity) vs. 133.5±9.7 months (non-convexity), p=0.014]. The size of tumor was also an important variable in survival time [146.7±10.1 months (group <3 cm) vs. 81.5±11.9 months (group ≥3 cm), p=0.003]. With regard to permanent complication after treatment for recurrence, the presence of complication had a significantly correlation with shorter survival time (44.1±9.6 months vs. 132.3±9.6 months, p=0.011). Our study showed that the patient treated with open resection survived for a shorter period than patients treated with GKRS/RT, with marginal significance (p=0.097). Pretreatment symptom also showed a marginal significance (p=0.099). On multivariate analysis, initial pathology and tumor size were independent predicting factors for survival rate. Benign pathology [hazard ratio (HR) 0.132, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.048–0.362, p<0.001] and tumor size <3 cm HR 0.167, 95% CI 0.061–0.452, p<0.001) were significantly associated with longer survival rate.

Progression-free survival

The incidence of progression rate was 23.9% over follow-up period after treatment for recurred meningiomas (16/67). The 5-, 10-, and 15-year PFS were 79.1, 76.1, and 76.1%, respectively (Fig. 2A). The results of analyses of the factors correlated with survival time are shown in Fig. 2B and Table 3. On univariate analysis, only treatment modality for recurred lesion was important for PFS [80.4±11.1 months (open resection) vs. 133.4±7.8 months (GKRS/RT), p=0.001]. This parameter was an independent predictable factor for PFS (GKRS/RT; HR 0.117, 95% CI 0.027–0.518, p<0.005). However, factors such as resection degree, pathological grade, tumor size, and location did not show statistical significance in the statistical analyses.
Fig. 2

Kaplan-Meier curves showing PFS of 67 study patients based on different predictors (overall comparison was estimated using a log-rank test). The number on right lower in each curve represents the p-value. A: Entire patients. B: Treatment modality for recurrence. PFS, progression-free survival; GKRS, Gamma knife radiosurgery; RT, radiotherapy.

Table 3

Univariate and multivariate analyses for progression-free survival from the treatment for recurred meningiomas

VariableSurvivalUnivariateMultivariate
Mean duration±SD (months)p-valueHR95% CIp-value
Age (years)0.7450.758
 <65106.0±9.2
 ≥6584.9±8.0
Sex0.4550.193
 Male96.2±13.2
 Female111.8±9.5
Initial postop complication0.6040.980
 None or transient101.3±8.9
 Permanent115.4±13.0
Location0.5880.469
 Convexitiy103.9±19.5
 Non-convexity107.3±8.1
Initial pathology (WHO grade)0.9380.984
 Benign107.6±9.2
 Atypical or anaplastic109.4±12.7
Initial resection (Simpson grade)0.6950.419
 Grade I, II105.1±9.1
 Grade III, IV109.0±15.3
Initial resection margin0.9140.770
 Good106.7±10.0
 Poor106.0±12.3
Initial multilobularity0.4890.190
 No109.8±11.1
 Yes102±10.9
Size at recurrence (cm)0.4330.669
 <3111.9± 9.3
 ≥397.8±13.0
Symptom at recurrence0.7520.359
 No110.1±9.9
 Yes100.8±12.4
Edema at recurrence0.3900.503
 No or mild111.4±8.7
 Moderate to severe93.7±16.2
T2 intensity at recurrence0.4990.922
 High or Iso109.4±9.5
 Low99.8±13.9
Treatment at recurrence0.0010.1170.027–0.5180.005
 Open resection80.4±11.1
 Radiosurgery/radiotherapy133.4±7.8
Postoperative complication0.1650.827
 No110.7±8.0
 Yes55.3±11.7

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval

Complication

Permanent complication occurred in 10 patients (14.9%). The most common complication was hemorrhagic change (n=2, 3.0%), followed by hydrocephalus (n=2, 3.0%), and infection (n=2, 3.0%). The results of analyses of the variables that could be correlated with permanent complications are shown in Table 4.
Table 4

Univariate and multivariate analyses for postoperative complication from the treatment for recurred meningiomas

VariableComplicationUnivariateMultivariate
No (%)Yes (%)p-valueHR95% CIp-value
Age (years)0.1370.092
 <6538 (80.9)9 (19.1)
 ≥6519 (95.0)1 (5.0)
Sex0.9010.453
 Male24 (85.7)4 (14.3)
 Female33 (84.6)6 (15.4)
Initial postop complication0.4470.960
 None or transient41 (87.2)6 (12.8)
 Permanent16 (80.0)4 (20.0)
Location0.2800.360
 Convexity9 (75.0)3 (25.0)
 Non-convexity48 (87.3)7 (12.7)
Initial Pathology (WHO grade)0.5860.240
 Grade I37 (88.1)5 (11.9)
 Grade II, III20 (80.0)5 (20.0)
Initial resection (simpson grade)0.9010.480
 Grade I, II41 (85.4)7 (14.6)
 Grade III, IV16 (84.2)3 (15.8)
Initial resection margin0.0060.089
 Good38 (95.0)2 (5.0)
 Poor19 (70.4)8 (29.6)
Initial multilobularity0.6660.421
 No30 (83.3)6 (16.7)
 Yes27 (87.1)4 (12.9)
Size at recurrence (cm)0.0010.0600.007–0.5090.010
 <337 (97.4)1 (2.6)
 ≥320 (69.0)9 (31.0)
Symptom at recurrence0.6820.508
 No38 (86.4)6 (13.6)
 Yes19 (82.6)4 (17.4)
Edema at recurrence0.1950.270
 No or mild45 (88.2)6 (11.8)
 Moderate to severe12 (75.0)4 (25.0)
T2 intensity at recurrence0.5530.350
 High or Iso47 (83.9)9 (16.1)
 Low10 (90.9)1 (9.1)
Treatment at recurrence0.001Not included
 Open resection26 (72.2)10 (27.8)
 Radiosurgery/radiotherapy31 (100)0 (0)

HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval

On univariate analysis, tumor size and treatment modality showed statistical significance. Permanent complications were more prevalent in patient with tumor ≥3 cm than those with tumors <3 cm (2.6% vs. 31.0%, p=0.001). Patients treated with open resection had a higher complication rate, as compared to the patients treated with GKRS/RT (27.8% vs. 0%, p=0.001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that larger tumor size (HR 0.060, 95% CI 0.007–0.509, p=0.010) was significant as an independent prognostic factor for development of complications. Although treatment modality was not included for multivariate analysis, it should be considered as one of the predictable factor for complication. Age, sex, preoperative symptoms, WHO grade, resection degree, tumor consistency, and location were not statistically significant.

Open resection vs. radiation treatment (GKRS/RT)

On comparing result from treatment modalities for recurred meningiomas, few showed significant differences, including size of tumors, re-progression rate, and complication rate. In GKRS/RT, mean size of tumors was 2.2 cm, but 4.3 cm in open resection (p<0.001). Based on larger than 3 cm, the number of open resection was over two-fold higher than those of GKRS/RT (p<0.015). Re-progression rate was 6.5% in GKRS/RT and 38.9% in open resection (p<0.002). Complication rate was 27.8% when treated by open resection; however, there was no complication after GKRS/RT (p<0.001). The Simpson grade or WHO grade were statistically not significant (Table 5).
Table 5

Comparison of clinicoradiological characteristics according to treatment modalities for recurred meningiomas

CharacteristicsRadiosurgery/RTOpen resectionp-value
Characteristics related with 2nd treatments
 Age (years)
  Mean±SD57.6±13.754.1±13.60.864
  ≥65 (%)35.525.00.505
 Sex
  Male (%)45.238.90.787
 Location
  Convexity (%)12.922.20.321
 Size (cm)
  Mean±SD2.2±1.44.3±2.7<0.001
  ≥3 (%)25.858.30.015
 Low in T2 (%)22.611.10.206
 Moderate/high peritumoral edema (%)22.6251.000
 Severe symptom (%)35.533.31.000
 Interval between 1st and 2nd treatments (months)74.0±56.642.6±37.00.170
 Re-progression rate (%)6.538.90.002
 Complication rate (%)027.80.001
 Expire rate (%)19.438.90.140
 Follow-up duration (mean±SD, months)68.4±45.561.7±46.50.747
Characteristics related with initial treatment (%)
 Multilobulation51.641.70.570
 Poor resection plane29.050.00.135
 Simpson’s grade ≥III38.719.40.141
 WHO grade II/III29.044.40.295
 Complication after 1st treatment29.030.61.000

RT, radiotherapy; SD, standard deviation

DISCUSSION

Meningiomas account for approximately one-third of primary CNS tumors [910]. In the classification of meningiomas based on the WHO grades, benign meningiomas reportedly comprise 92%, atypical meningioma 5–7%, and malignant meningioma 1–3% of the total [1112131415]. Although not all meningiomas warrant treatment, surgery and/or radiation therapy constitutes the initial therapeutic approach [16]. As meningiomas are histologically benign tumors, macroscopic total resection is expected to be curative. However, several meningiomas recur after macroscopic total resection. In WHO grade I meningiomas, 5-year recurrence or progression rates are reported as approximately 10% after complete resection and 45% after non-radical resection [1718]. Van Alkemade et al. [19] showed that OS at 5, 10, 15, and 20 years was 91.5, 81.4, 62.5, and 53.4%, respectively. After 13 years, the observed survival is positioned significantly under the expected survival curve due to excess mortality related to brain tumor or stroke. Recurrence rates at 5, 10, and 15 years were also reported as 18, 26, and 32%, respectively. Atypical and malignant meningiomas are associated with an increased risk of local recurrence and decreased OS, as compared with WHO grade I meningiomas. Klinger et al. [20] reported that 44% of atypical meningiomas developed clinical-radiologic evidence of recurrence at an average of 32.4 months after surgical resection. In our previous study, overall recurrence rate of atypical meningioma was 25.5% (14% in Simpson's grade I and 37% in Simpson's grade II/III/IV) [21]. In malignant meningiomas, the recurrence rate after complete extirpation is 20–40% by the decade and increases to 40–60% in partial extirpation patients [22]. Statistical significances varied by studies, nevertheless, histologically higher grade meninigioma showed higher recurrence or progress rate. According to original Simpson's grade, recurrent rates were 9% for grade I, 16% for grade II, and 29% for grade III [23]. This is comparable with results from another cohort and it suggests the remnant tumor cells left behind removed space and that cells could be in continuous proliferation [24]. Some authors propose that a Simpson grade 0 resection can decrease recurrence by additional removal a 2–4 cm outwards each dural margin [2526]. Although the majority occur within the first two to three years after resection, late recurrences are common. Recent studies indicate that adjuvant RT or GKRS after surgery show good outcomes for preventing recurrence, but guidelines of treatment for already recurred meningioma are still not established. In our study, independent predictive factor for longer survival were benign pathology (HR 0.132, 95% CI 0.048–0.362, p<0.001) and tumor size <3 cm (HR 0.167, 95% CI 0.061–0.452, p<0.001). In univariate statistics, tumor location and complication at the first operation showed statistical significance. Treatment modality (open resection vs. radiation treatment) showed marginal significance. In PFS, only radiation treatment was an independent predictive factor (HR 0.117, 95% CI 0.027–0.518, p<0.005). Regarding complication rates, larger than 3 cm size (HR 0.060, 95% CI 0.007–0.509, p=0.010) was a significant independent predictive factor for development of complications. Although treatment modality was not a significant factor, it should be considered as a predictable factor for complication. As shown in Table 5, radiation treatment was better in all parameters than open resection as the treatment modality for recurred lesion. In addition to surgical resection or radiation treatment, pharmacologic therapy is in use for recurred meningiomas [27]. Mainly antiangiogenic agents such as bevacizumab, vatalanib, and sunitinib have made promising results but they are still in issue to be used clinically [2829]. Other agents including hydroxyurea, epidermal growth factor inhibitor, hormonal therapeutics, α-interferon, and somatostatin receptor agonists have been tried for recurred meningioma [303132]. Up to now, pharmacologic therapy is not first therapeutic option for recurred meningioma and used narrowly for refractory recurrent tumor. However, the solidity of the evidence might soon advance with identification of the pharmacologic target effect. Major limitation of this study is its retrospective design, which makes many types of bias. Another limitation is inclusion of all WHO grades for studied patients, possibly leading a selection bias for treatment. In addition, the size of recurred tumor may cause another selection bias for treatment modality. The relatively small number of patients and short follow-up duration can be other limitations in current study. Further studies need to be performed prospectively with large numbers of benign pathology for establishing treatment strategy of recurred meningiomas. In conclusion, although open surgical resection is the treatment choice for symptomatic or large sized meningiomas, it is questionable for recurred tumors, considering high progression and complication rates after repeated open resection. Thus, frequent and regular imaging follow-up is required to detect recurred tumor sized as small as possible, and radiation treatment can be considered as a preferential treatment.
  32 in total

1.  Report on 280 cases of verified parasagittal meningioma.

Authors:  G F HOESSLY; H OLIVECRONA
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1955-11       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment.

Authors:  D SIMPSON
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1957-02       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  CBTRUS Statistical Report: Primary Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Diagnosed in the United States in 2008-2012.

Authors:  Quinn T Ostrom; Haley Gittleman; Jordonna Fulop; Max Liu; Rachel Blanda; Courtney Kromer; Yingli Wolinsky; Carol Kruchko; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 4.  Historical benchmarks for medical therapy trials in surgery- and radiation-refractory meningioma: a RANO review.

Authors:  Thomas Kaley; Igor Barani; Marc Chamberlain; Michael McDermott; Katherine Panageas; Jeffrey Raizer; Leland Rogers; David Schiff; Michael Vogelbaum; Damien Weber; Patrick Wen
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  The accuracy of meningioma grading: a 10-year retrospective audit.

Authors:  J Willis; C Smith; J W Ironside; S Erridge; I R Whittle; D Everington
Journal:  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.090

6.  Late outcome of operations for supratentorial convexity meningiomas. Report on 207 cases.

Authors:  S Giombini; C L Solero; G Morello
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1984-12

7.  Repeated multifocal recurrence of grade I, grade II, and grade III meningiomas: regional multicentricity (primary new growth) or metastases?

Authors:  J de Vries; A K Wakhloo
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1994-04

8.  The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment.

Authors:  A B Adegbite; M I Khan; K W Paine; L K Tan
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 9.  Epidemiology of primary brain tumors: current concepts and review of the literature.

Authors:  Margaret Wrensch; Yuriko Minn; Terri Chew; Melissa Bondy; Mitchel S Berger
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 12.300

10.  Recurrence of intracranial meningiomas: the role played by regional multicentricity. Part 2: Clinical and radiological aspects.

Authors:  B Borovich; Y Doron; J Braun; J N Guilburd; M Zaaroor; D Goldsher; A Lemberger; J Gruszkiewicz; M Feinsod
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 5.115

View more
  3 in total

1.  High-risk Meningioma: Initial Outcomes From NRG Oncology/RTOG 0539.

Authors:  C Leland Rogers; Minhee Won; Michael A Vogelbaum; Arie Perry; Lynn S Ashby; Jignesh M Modi; Anthony M Alleman; James Galvin; Shannon E Fogh; Emad Youssef; Nimisha Deb; Young Kwok; Clifford G Robinson; Hui-Kuo Shu; Barbara J Fisher; Valerie Panet-Raymond; William G McMillan; John F de Groot; Peixin Zhang; Minesh P Mehta
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 7.038

2.  Comparative Analysis of the MRI Characteristics of Meningiomas According to the 2016 WHO Pathological Classification.

Authors:  Juan Yu; Fan-Fan Chen; Han-Wen Zhang; Hong Zhang; Si-Ping Luo; Guo-Dong Huang; Fan Lin; Yi Lei; Liangping Luo
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020 Jan-Dec

3.  Multisession radiosurgery for grade 2 (WHO), high risk meningiomas. A phase II clinical trial.

Authors:  Marcello Marchetti; Valentina Pinzi; Cecilia Iezzoni; Sara Morlino; Irene Tramacere; Elena De Martin; Irene Cane; Laura Fariselli
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 4.506

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.