Literature DB >> 29188058

Alterations in three biomarkers (estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and human epidermal growth factor 2) and the Ki67 index between primary and metastatic breast cancer lesions.

Kimihito Fujii1, Rie Watanabe2, Takahito Ando1, Junko Kousaka1, Yukako Mouri1, Miwa Yoshida3, Tsuneo Imai4, Shogo Nakano1, Takashi Fukutomi5.   

Abstract

In recurrent breast cancer, the tumor phenotype, as assessed by estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2) status, occasionally changes. This change, in addition to the Ki67 index were evaluated at sites of recurrence and the correlation between changes in tumor phenotype and survival were assessed in breast cancer patients. Comparisons in pathological parameters between primary and metastatic lesions were drawn between ER, PR, HER2, and the Ki67 index in 70 patients with recurrent breast cancer. The association between changes in tumor phenotype and patient survival was assessed. The hormone receptor status changed from positive, in the primary lesions, to negative, in the metastatic lesions in 19.8% (ER) and 39.5% (PR) of patients, respectively. Conversion from negative to positive status was confirmed in 27.2% (ER) and 31.2% (PR) of patients, respectively. A change in HER2 status from negative (primary lesion) to positive (metastatic lesion) occurred in seven patients (10%). The mean Ki67 index of primary lesions with positive hormone receptor status was significantly lower than at sites of recurrence with any hormone receptor status, from 10.9±9.8 standard deviation (SD) to 22.9±18.6 (P=0.031) and 12.2±10.5 SD to 27.4±20.9 (P=0.023), for ER and PR, respectively. The mean overall survival of patients with ER status conversion from positive to negative was 7.4±1.2 standard error (SE) years, and 14.8±1.4 SE years for patients who retained positive ER status (P=0.005, log-rank), with a hazard ratio of 3.44 (95% confidence interval, 1.36-8.33). This difference in survival based upon change in ER status was similarly observed in patients with PR status conversion in the same direction. Thus, ER and PR status conversion at the time of recurrence strongly impact survival, particularly if the change is from positive (primary lesion) to negative (metastatic lesion). Monitoring the biological behavior of breast cancer may benefit a patient by allowing for a novel personalized treatment strategy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ki67 index; estrogen receptor; human epidermal growth factor 2; progesterone receptor; receptor conversion and metastatic breast cancer

Year:  2017        PMID: 29188058      PMCID: PMC5702957          DOI: 10.3892/br.2017.1003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Rep        ISSN: 2049-9434


  24 in total

1.  c-erbB-2 protein overexpression and p53 immunoreaction in primary and recurrent breast cancer tissues.

Authors:  C Shimizu; T Fukutomi; H Tsuda; S Akashi-Tanaka; T Watanabe; T Nanasawa; K Sugihara
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.454

2.  Loss of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression in metastatic sites of HER2-overexpressing primary breast tumors.

Authors:  Naoki Niikura; Jun Liu; Naoki Hayashi; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Yun Gong; Shana L Palla; Yutaka Tokuda; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Immunochemistry for oestrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and HER2 on cell blocks in primary breast carcinoma.

Authors:  S K Kumar; N Gupta; A Rajwanshi; K Joshi; G Singh
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2011-03-06       Impact factor: 2.073

4.  American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer.

Authors:  Antonio C Wolff; M Elizabeth H Hammond; Jared N Schwartz; Karen L Hagerty; D Craig Allred; Richard J Cote; Mitchell Dowsett; Patrick L Fitzgibbons; Wedad M Hanna; Amy Langer; Lisa M McShane; Soonmyung Paik; Mark D Pegram; Edith A Perez; Michael F Press; Anthony Rhodes; Catharine Sturgeon; Sheila E Taube; Raymond Tubbs; Gail H Vance; Marc van de Vijver; Thomas M Wheeler; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-12-11       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Biology of progesterone receptor loss in breast cancer and its implications for endocrine therapy.

Authors:  Xiaojiang Cui; Rachel Schiff; Grazia Arpino; C Kent Osborne; Adrian V Lee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-10-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Hormonal receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, and Ki67 discordance between primary breast cancer and paired metastases: clinical impact.

Authors:  Toni Ibrahim; Alberto Farolfi; Emanuela Scarpi; Laura Mercatali; Laura Medri; Marianna Ricci; Oriana Nanni; Luigi Serra; Dino Amadori
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.935

7.  Estrogen and progesterone receptor concordance between primary and recurrent breast cancer.

Authors:  B D Li; A Byskosh; A Molteni; R B Duda
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 3.454

8.  Quantitative analysis of changes in ER, PR and HER2 expression in primary breast cancer and paired nodal metastases.

Authors:  S J Aitken; J S Thomas; S P Langdon; D J Harrison; D Faratian
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-10-25       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Variation in receptor status between primary and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  I M Holdaway; J V Bowditch
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-08-01       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  Changes in the ER, PgR, HER2, p53 and Ki-67 biological markers between primary and recurrent breast cancer: discordance rates and prognosis.

Authors:  Reiki Nishimura; Tomofumi Osako; Yasuhiro Okumura; Rumiko Tashima; Yasuo Toyozumi; Nobuyuki Arima
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Breast Cancer Brain Metastasis: The Potential Role of MRI Beyond Current Clinical Applications.

Authors:  Andria Hadjipanteli; Paul Doolan; Efthyvoulos Kyriacou; Anastasia Constantinidou
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.989

2.  Hormone Receptor Expression in Multicentric/Multifocal versus Unifocal Breast Cancer: Especially the VDR Determines the Outcome Related to Focality.

Authors:  Alaleh Zati Zehni; Sven-Niclas Jacob; Jan-Niclas Mumm; Helene Hildegard Heidegger; Nina Ditsch; Sven Mahner; Udo Jeschke; Theresa Vilsmaier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.923

3.  Characterizing advanced breast cancer heterogeneity and treatment resistance through serial biopsies and comprehensive analytics.

Authors:  Allen Li; Jamie M Keck; Swapnil Parmar; Janice Patterson; Marilyne Labrie; Allison L Creason; Brett E Johnson; Molly Downey; George Thomas; Carol Beadling; Laura M Heiser; Annette Kolodzie; Alexander R Guimaraes; Christopher L Corless; Joe W Gray; Gordon B Mills; Raymond C Bergan; Zahi I Mitri
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2021-03-26

4.  Peritoneal dissemination of breast cancer diagnosed by laparoscopy.

Authors:  Tsuyoshi Nakagawa; Goshi Oda; Akifumi Kikuchi; Toshifumi Saito; Tomoyuki Fujioka; Kazunori Kubota; Mio Mori; Iichiro Onishi; Hiroyuki Uetake
Journal:  Int Cancer Conf J       Date:  2020-11-14

Review 5.  Prognostic significance of receptor expression discordance between primary and recurrent breast cancers: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sho Shiino; Graham Ball; Binafsha M Syed; Sasagu Kurozumi; Andrew R Green; Hitoshi Tsuda; Shin Takayama; Akihiko Suto; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-10-06       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Role of Estrogen Receptor-Positive/Negative Ratios in Regulating Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yanchu Li; Hengli Zhang; Tingting Jiang; Ping Li
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  The Prognosis of Single Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Stratified by HER2 Status.

Authors:  Hengqiang Zhao; Yiping Gong
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 6.244

8.  Hypoxia Imaging and Biological Evaluation of the Radiosensitizing Effect of Oleanolic Acid.

Authors:  Hui Wang; Yu Zhang; Wenjing Yu; Yangyang Xue; Liang Xiao; Huiqin Xu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 3.411

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.