| Literature DB >> 29187979 |
Annette M Fahrenkrog1,2, Leandro G Neves1,2,3, Márcio F R Resende4, Christopher Dervinis1, Ruth Davenport5, W Brad Barbazuk5,6, Matias Kirst1,6.
Abstract
Despite its economic importance as a bioenergy crop and key role in riparian ecosystems, little is known about genetic diversity and adaptation of the eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides). Here, we report the first population genomics study for this species, conducted on a sample of 425 unrelated individuals collected in 13 states of the southeastern United States. The trees were genotyped by targeted resequencing of 18,153 genes and 23,835 intergenic regions, followed by the identification of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). This natural P. deltoides population showed low levels of subpopulation differentiation (FST = 0.022-0.106), high genetic diversity (θW = 0.00100, π = 0.00170), a large effective population size (Ne ≈ 32,900), and low to moderate levels of linkage disequilibrium. Additionally, genomewide scans for selection (Tajima's D), subpopulation differentiation (XTX), and environmental association analyses with eleven climate variables carried out with two different methods (LFMM and BAYENV2) identified genes putatively involved in local adaptation. Interestingly, many of these genes were also identified as adaptation candidates in another poplar species, Populus trichocarpa, indicating possible convergent evolution. This study constitutes the first assessment of genetic diversity and local adaptation in P. deltoides throughout the southern part of its range, information we expect to be of use to guide management and breeding strategies for this species in future, especially in the face of climate change.Entities:
Keywords: Populus deltoides; eastern cottonwood; exome capture; genetic diversity; local adaptation; population structure
Year: 2017 PMID: 29187979 PMCID: PMC5696417 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3466
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Geographic distribution of subpopulations identified in Populus deltoides with STRUCTURE when assuming two groups (K = 2)
Figure 2Genomewide distribution of Tajima's D, Wall's B, nucleotide diversity (θW and π), and population differentiation () by subpopulation in Populus deltoides when assuming two groups (K = 2; subpopulation East‐K2: magenta; subpopulation West‐K2: blue; complete population: black). The approximate location of the outliers detected is marked with a black star
Figure 3Environmental association analysis with minimum temperature of the coldest month (Bio6) in Populus deltoides. (a) Bayes factor obtained with BAYENV2 for the single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) strongly associated with the environmental variable (SNPs ranked in the top 1% Bayes factor and rho). (b) Manhattan plot of the association results obtained with LFMM. The red line indicates a Bonferroni significance level of 0.01. In (a) and (b), SNPs present in genes identified by both methods (BAYENV2 and LFMM) as associated with minimum temperature of the coldest month are shown in green
Figure 4Overlap between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with the variable “minimum temperature of the coldest month” identified with two different methods (BAYENV2 and LFMM) in Populus deltoides. The scatterplot shows the SNPs identified as strong candidates for adaptation by BAYENV2 (those ranked among the 1% highest Bayes factor and 1% highest absolute value of ρ), correlating the Bayes factor obtained with BAYENV2 (x‐axis) with the −log10 of the p‐value obtained with LFMM (y‐axis). Four SNPs in four different genes were identified as significant with both methods (red points). Four additional overlapping candidate genes were identified through environmental association with different SNPs among methods. The eight SNPs identifying these additional genes when using BAYENV2 are shown in blue. These four additional genes were identified through five significant SNPs when using LFMM. Two of the SNPs were not included in the analysis with BAYENV2 and are not included in the figure for lack of a corresponding Bayes factor (their p‐values were 4.68 × 10−08 and 1.97 × 10−08). The other three SNPs are shown in orange. All remaining SNPs (gray points) were only significant according to BAYENV2 and not LFMM. The horizontal dashed line indicates the 1% significance threshold after Bonferroni correction for multiple testing applied to the LFMM results (p‐value = 8.75 × 10−08), and the vertical dashed line indicates the Bayes factor cutoff used to select the top associations (Bayes factor = 1.766)
Figure 5Overlap between methods used to identify genes under selection in Populus deltoides. The total number of genes identified is noted in parentheses next to the name of the method. The number of genes is lower than the number of associations reported in the text for LFMM, BAYENV2 and Tajima's D, because some genes were associated with more than one variable in the environmental association analysis with LFMM and Bayenv2 and some genes were Tajima's D outliers in the two populations analyzed