Literature DB >> 29187246

Comparison of Bispectral Index™ values during the flotation restricted environmental stimulation technique and results for stage I sleep: a prospective pilot investigation.

C Michael Dunham1, Jesse V McClain2, Amanda Burger3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether Bispectral Index™ values obtained during flotation-restricted environment stimulation technique have a similar profile in a single observation compared to literature-derived results found during sleep and other relaxation-induction interventions.
RESULTS: Bispectral Index™ values were as follows: awake-state, 96.6; float session-1, 84.3; float session-2, 82.3; relaxation-induction, 82.8; stage I sleep, 86.0; stage II sleep, 66.2; and stages III-IV sleep, 45.1. Awake-state values differed from float session-1 (%difference 12.7%; Cohen's d = 3.6) and float session-2 (%difference 14.8%; Cohen's d = 4.6). Relaxation-induction values were similar to float session-1 (%difference 1.8%; Cohen's d = 0.3) and float session-2 (%difference 0.5%; Cohen's d = 0.1). Stage I sleep values were similar to float session-1 (%difference 1.9%; Cohen's d = 0.4) and float session-2 (%difference 4.3%; Cohen's d = 1.0). Stage II sleep values differed from float session-1 (%difference 21.5%; Cohen's d = 4.3) and float session-2 (%difference 19.6%; Cohen's d = 4.0). Stages III-IV sleep values differed from float session-1 (%difference 46.5%; Cohen's d = 5.6) and float session-2 (%difference 45.2%; Cohen's d = 5.4). Bispectral Index™ values during flotation were comparable to those found in stage I sleep and nadir values described with other relaxation-induction techniques.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BIS monitor; Bispectral Index; Depth of sleep; Flotation-REST; Flotation-tank; Perception of sleep; Relaxation; Sensory isolation; Sleep EEG

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29187246      PMCID: PMC5707909          DOI: 10.1186/s13104-017-2947-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Res Notes        ISSN: 1756-0500


Introduction

The flotation-restricted environmental stimulation technique (REST), a process of floating horizontally and face up inside a quiet, dark tank filled with magnesium sulfate-saturated water held at normal skin temperature, has been associated with multiple benefits [1, 2]. However, investigations assessing intracranial neurophysiological events are limited. Sakata et al. showed that during float sessions stage I and stage II sleep were each present [3]. Using electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring, investigators have demonstrated increases in delta power [3] and theta power [4], findings also documented during sleep [5]. The only other flotation EEG investigations have not provided spectral power analysis information [6-8]. Since the first author has had experience with Bispectral Index™ (BIS) monitoring in the intensive care environment [9, 10] and is conducting an investigation using the BIS monitor as a tool for neurofeedback (Clinical Trials.gov: NCT03152331), we became interested in performing BIS monitoring during flotation-REST sessions. BIS values have been associated with distinct sleep stages [11-15], and found to decrease with relaxing guided imagery [16] and when viewing calming videos [17]. We hypothesized that BIS values obtained during flotation-REST would have a similar profile compared to literature-derived results found during sleep and other relaxation-induction interventions.

Main text

BIS monitoring during flotation

From April 7, 2017 to July 14, 2017, the first author underwent 22 1-hour flotation-REST sessions. During sessions 14 and 16, BIS monitoring was performed where BIS values were recorded on the BIS-X hard drive every minute during flotation. The monitor used was the BIS VISTA™ monitoring system, and the sensor established cutaneous contact at the FPz, FP2, AF8, and FT10 positions. As the monitor was located external to the tank and the first author was floating in darkness, there was no visual perception of the evolving BIS values. BIS values recorded on the hard drive were entered into a Microsoft Excel® 2010 spreadsheet and imported into SAS System for windows, release 9.2 for statistical analyses.

Literature-derived BIS values

A PubMed literature search was performed to identify manuscripts that provided BIS values obtained during the awake state. An overall weighted mean BIS value in the awake state was computed after entering the mean value for each cohort into the Excel spreadsheet according to the number of individuals participating in the cohort investigation. Also, we identified manuscripts that provided BIS values obtained during sleep monitoring. An overall weighted mean BIS value was computed for each sleep stage. An overall weighted mean BIS value was also computed for the two relaxation-induction studies.

Mood state assessment

Pre-flotation and post-flotation session mood scores were recorded for each session [18]. Using the mood qualities relaxation and freshness, two orientating prompts “right now I feel relaxed” and “right now I feel fresh” were evaluated. Each mood quality was scored as follows: definitely not, 1; not, 2; not really, 3; a little, 4; very much, 5; and extremely, 6. The two mood scores were summed (range 2–12).

Statistical analysis

A two-sample t test was used to compare intergroup BIS values and determine significant differences (p < 0.05). Cohen’s d statistic was computed for intergroup BIS value differences. Pre-flotation and post-flotation mood scores were compared using the Wilcoxon test for paired samples and Cohen’s d statistic.

Results

BIS values for awake patients emanated from 20 cohorts within 18 studies [14, 16, 19–34] (Additional file 1). Float session-1 monitoring lasted for 64 min and resulted in a BIS value of 84.3 ± 4.5 (range 77–98). The BIS value at 2 min was 83. The duration of float session-2 was 63 min with a BIS value of 82.3 ± 4.1 (range 77–97). The BIS value at 3 min was 83. BIS values for stage I sleep emanated from 42 participants in 3 studies (Table 1). BIS values for stage II sleep came from 25 participants in 2 studies (Table 1). BIS values for stages III–IV sleep emanated from 39 participants in 4 studies (Table 1). The weighted-mean BIS progressively decreased from sleep stage I to sleep stages III–IV.
Table 1

BIS values by sleep stage

Sleep stageParticipantsBIS
Stage I
 Benini [11] {#2}1588.9
 Dahaba [12] {#4}1080.0
 Tung [13] {#35}1786.5
42 86.0 ± 3.5
Stage II
 Benini [11] {#2}1563.0
 Dahaba [12] {#4}1071.0
25 66.2 ± 4.0
Stage III–IV
 Benini [11] {#2}333.0
 Benini [11] {#2}116.0
 Dahaba [12] {#4}1052.0
 Dahaba [12] {#4}1041.0
 Nieuwenhuijs [14] {#25}1042.0
 Sleigh [15] {#33}559.0
39 45.1 ± 8.9

BIS Bispectral Index™

BIS values by sleep stage BIS Bispectral Index™ Nadir BIS values during relaxation-induction emanated from 54 participants in 2 studies [16, 17] (Additional file 2). BIS value comparisons for the various conditions are presented in Table 2. The minimal mean percent differences and low Cohen’s d values indicate that float session-1 and float session-2 were similar to relaxation induction and sleep stage I. The other comparisons demonstrated substantial mean differences between float session-1 and float session-2 and the awake state, stage II sleep, and stages III–IV sleep. The awake state and each sleep stage had a relatively large BIS mean difference (p < 0.0001), and the Cohen’s d values were as follows: awake state versus stage I sleep, 3.9; stage I versus stage II sleep, 5.3; and stage II versus stages III–IV sleep, 3.1.
Table 2

Comparisons of BIS data by clinical conditions

BIS p value%differenceCohen’s d
Awake state96.6 ± 1.7
Float session-184.3 ± 4.5< 0.000112.73.6
Awake state96.6 ± 1.7
Float session-282.3 ± 4.1< 0.000114.84.6
Relaxation induction82.8 ± 6.8
Float session-184.3 ± 4.50.15481.80.3
Relaxation induction82.8 ± 6.8
Float session-282.3 ± 4.10.62560.50.1
Sleep stage I86.0 ± 3.5
Float session-184.3 ± 4.50.02921.90.4
Sleep stage I86.0 ± 3.5
Float session-282.3 ± 4.1< 0.00014.31.0
Float session-184.3 ± 4.5
Sleep stage II66.2 ± 4.0< 0.000121.54.3
Float session-282.3 ± 4.1
Sleep stage II66.2 ± 4.0< 0.000119.64.0
Float session-184.3 ± 4.5
Sleep stages III–IV45.1 ± 8.9< 0.000146.55.6
Float session-282.3 ± 4.1
Sleep stages III–IV45.1 ± 8.9< 0.000145.25.4

BIS Bispectral Index™

Comparisons of BIS data by clinical conditions BIS Bispectral Index™ Pre-flotation and post-flotation mood scores are depicted in Table 3. The mean pre-flotation mood score was 6.5 ± 1.3 (median 6.0), and the mean post-flotation mood score was 10.0 ± 1.6 (median 10.0) (p < 0.0001, Wilcoxon test for paired samples [two-tailed]; Cohen’s d = 2.4). Pre-flotation mood scores progressively increased from 5 at sessions 1–7 to 8 at sessions 16–22. Similarly, post-flotation mood scores increased during later sessions. The mean pre-flotation and post-flotation difference for the 22 float sessions was 3.5 ± 0.5.
Table 3

Pre-flotation and post-flotation mood scores by flotation sessions

SessionPre-flotationPost-flotationDifferenceBIS monitoring
1583
2583
3583
4583
5583
6583
7583
8693
96104
106104
116104
126104
137103
147103Session-1
157103
168124Session-2
178124
188124
198124
208124
218124
228124

BIS Bispectral Index™

Pre-flotation and post-flotation mood scores by flotation sessions BIS Bispectral Index™

Discussion

EEG spectral power and BIS for flotation-REST and sleep

The principal finding of the current investigation suggests that BIS values for flotation-REST are comparable to literature-derived results transpiring during relaxation-induction and stage I sleep. As well, the flotation-REST BIS values were substantially different compared to the awake state and stages II and III–IV sleep values. Additionally, BIS values for the awake state and sleep stages I, II, and III–IV were substantially variant from each other. According to standard sleep EEG criteria, wakefulness is characterized by > 50% of the epoch consisting of alpha activity in a relaxed subject with eyes closed or by < 50% of the epoch with low-voltage, mixed frequency (2–7 Hz) activity [35, 36]. Further, wakefulness is associated with an obvious presence of beta activity, especially with open eyes and while concentrating [37, 38]. However, stage I sleep is characterized by 50% of the epoch consisting of relatively low-voltage, mixed frequency (2–7 Hz) activity and < 50% of epoch containing alpha activity [35, 36]. Stage I sleep is largely defined by exclusion: a low-voltage, mixed frequency back ground EEG activity devoid of sleep spindles and K-complexes, cessation of blinking, absence of saccadic eye movements, and alpha activity in < 50% of the epoch [36]. Since evidence indicates that stage I sleep can also be quantitatively described according to alpha or theta dominance [39] or depicted by several unique qualitative EEG findings [40], it is clear that stage I sleep consists of a diverse array of electrophysiological subpopulations. Although the precise electrophysiological basis for computing BIS values is unclear, certain publications have been elucidative [41, 42]. Evidence indicates that for BIS values 60–100, there is a near-perfect correlation between the BIS value and beta ratio (spectral power of 30–47 Hz ÷ power of 11–20 Hz) [43]. It is relevant that spectral entropy, an EEG processing technique similar to BIS monitoring, has been recently shown to discriminate the transition from the awake state to stage I sleep [44]. In the current investigation, BIS values progressively decreased from the awake state to stage I sleep, stage II sleep, and stages III–IV sleep. The delta plus theta amplitude has been shown to account for 50% of the relative power in the awake state [38]. During stage I sleep, when compared to the awake state, investigators have demonstrated an increase in relative delta plus theta power and a decrease in relative beta power [5, 38]. Further, it has been shown that relative to stage I sleep and when advancing from stage II to stage IV sleep, beta relative power progressively decreases, and theta plus delta relative power increases [5]; Uchida et al. demonstrated a power density reciprocal relationship between beta and delta activity across all stages of sleep [45]. Together, these observations provide an electrophysiological rationale as to reasons why BIS monitoring would discriminately correlate with the awake state and the various stages of sleep. Several observations have been made during flotation-REST that are important; specifically, investigators have demonstrated that delta power [3] and theta power [4] increase during flotation-REST. Further, stage I and stage II sleep, using polysomnography, each have been found to account for 40% of the time during flotation-REST [3]. Additionally, Fine et al. concluded that the EEG during flotation-REST was consistent with stage I sleep [4].

Cognitive experiences in stage I sleep and flotation-REST

Multiple functional changes have been described during stage I sleep: slow-rolling eye movements, drowsiness, decreased eyelid blinking, slow eye movements, increasing number of wrong answers to questions, and a decrease in response to audible tones [35]. Drowsiness, a manifestation of stage I sleep, is characterized by increased eyelid closure (decreased eyelid opening) and a propensity for decreased alertness and inclination to fall asleep [44, 46, 47]. Cognitive experiences during stage I sleep have been described as a dream-like or half-awake, half-asleep state and may include random visual images, thoughts, or feelings; a decrease in awareness of the surrounding environment; and an alteration in time awareness [40, 48]. Qualitatively comparable hypnagogic mental phenomena have also been found during flotation-REST, suggesting that the two states have similar experiential features [49, 50]. Vivid and detailed written documentations [51] and results from comprehensive questionnaires [49] of persons immediately following emersion from the flotation-REST tank indicate that some degree of awareness is present during floating. As some degree of vigilance has also been described during stage I sleep [48], these findings further suggest that stage I sleep and flotation-REST are likely to be relatively similar states.

Physiology in stage I sleep and flotation-REST

Multiple physiologic alterations have been described during stage I sleep: decreased minute ventilation, muscle tone, heart rate, blood pressure, metabolic rate, and frontal lobe blood flow [35, 37]. Other investigations have demonstrated that flotation-REST is associated with reductions in blood pressure [52, 53] and levels of plasma cortisol [52, 54, 55], plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone [54], thyroid stimulating hormone [55], plasma noradrenalin [56], and urinary catecholamine [55]. Each of these five researchers concluded in their manuscript that flotation-REST is conducive to relaxation. Although physiological changes in flotation-REST do not circumscribe a specific sleep stage, it is plausible that stage I sleep is included in this array of physiological alterations.

Relaxation induction and flotation-REST

In Hudetz et al.’s investigation of relaxing guided imagery, anxiety scores and BIS values decreased, indicating that a relaxation effect had indeed occurred [16]. The nadir BIS values with relaxation induction are virtually identical to the mean BIS values transpiring during the two flotation-REST sessions. This suggests that flotation-REST has an electrophysiological signature comparable to that of induced relaxation. BIS nadir onsets for the two relaxation-induction activities were at 15 and 55 min; however, during flotation-REST, the BIS value was substantially reduced within a couple of minutes, when compared to that in the awake state. This potentially speaks to the notion that flotation-REST may have a rapid onset and persistent calming effect. Since the relaxation-induction BIS values are similar to the stage I sleep results, this suggests that a peaceful demeanor is likely a feature of stage I sleep.

Mood enhancement

The first author’s experience demonstrated that pre-flotation-REST mood scores increased in the later sessions compared to the early sessions. Further, the post-flotation-REST mood scores were significantly greater in contrast to the pre-flotation scores. These observations are corroborated by other flotation-REST studies that have demonstrated an objective improvement in relaxation [2, 18, 53, 55] and mood enhancement [18, 52].

Conclusions

The objective BIS electrophysiological signature implies that relaxation-induction, stage I sleep, and flotation-REST may be comparable conditions of consciousness. The qualitative similarities regarding cognitive experiences and partial awareness that occur during stage I sleep and flotation-REST also suggest that the two are likely to be analogous states.

Limitations

The principal limitation of this investigation is that only one person underwent flotation-REST while BIS monitoring was performed. Additional file 1. Awake state BIS values. Data of awake state Bispectral Index™ values from previous studies. Additional file 2. BIS values during relaxation-induction. Data of Bispectral Index™ values during relaxation-induction from previous studies.
  48 in total

1.  A study on polysomnographic observations and subjective experiences under sensory deprivation.

Authors:  K Iwata; M Yamamoto; M Nakao; M Kimura
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.188

2.  The bispectral index: a measure of depth of sleep?

Authors:  J W Sleigh; J Andrzejowski; A Steyn-Ross; M Steyn-Ross
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Hypnotic endpoints vs. the bispectral index, 95% spectral edge frequency and median frequency during propofol infusion with or without fentanyl.

Authors:  W D Mi; T Sakai; H Singh; T Kudo; M Kudo; A Matsuki
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Quantitative characteristics of alpha and theta EEG activities during sensory deprivation.

Authors:  K Iwata; M Nakao; M Yamamoto; M Kimura
Journal:  Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.188

5.  Analysis of the bispectral index during natural sleep in children.

Authors:  Franca Benini; Manuela Trapanotto; Stefano Sartori; Anna Capretta; Daniela Gobber; Clementina Boniver; Franco Zacchello
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.108

6.  Effects of stellate ganglion block on sedation as assessed by bispectral index in normal healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Jinseok Yeo; Younghoon Jeon
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2015 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.965

7.  The bispectral index, a useful adjunct for the timely diagnosis of brain death in the comatose trauma patient.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; D Alisa Katradis; Mark D Williams
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Electroencephalogram bispectral analysis predicts the depth of midazolam-induced sedation.

Authors:  J Liu; H Singh; P F White
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  The accuracy of eyelid movement parameters for drowsiness detection.

Authors:  Vanessa E Wilkinson; Melinda L Jackson; Justine Westlake; Bronwyn Stevens; Maree Barnes; Philip Swann; Shantha M W Rajaratnam; Mark E Howard
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2013-12-15       Impact factor: 4.062

10.  [Comparison of the bispectral index in awake patients with cerebral palsy].

Authors:  Verônica Vieira da Costa; Rafael Villela S D Torres; Erika Carvalho Pires Arci; Renato Angelo Saraiva
Journal:  Rev Bras Anestesiol       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 0.964

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bispectral Index Alterations and Associations With Autonomic Changes During Hypnosis in Trauma Center Researchers: Formative Evaluation Study.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Amanda J Burger; Barbara M Hileman; Elisha A Chance; Amy E Hutchinson
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-05-26

2.  Brainwave Self-Regulation During Bispectral IndexTM Neurofeedback in Trauma Center Nurses and Physicians After Receiving Mindfulness Instructions.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Amanda L Burger; Barbara M Hileman; Elisha A Chance; Amy E Hutchinson; Chander M Kohli; Lori DeNiro; Jill M Tall; Paul Lisko
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-09-26

3.  Learning receptive awareness via neurofeedback in stressed healthcare providers: a prospective pilot investigation.

Authors:  C Michael Dunham; Amanda L Burger; Barbara M Hileman; Elisha A Chance
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-09-04
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.