| Literature DB >> 29187182 |
Guo Zhu1,2, Li-Yuan Jiang1,2, Zhang Yi1,2, Li Ping1,2, Chun-Yue Duan1,2, Cao Yong1,2, Jin-Yang Liu3,4, Jian-Zhong Hu5,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint tuberculosis(SJT) is relatively uncommon, but it may cause severe sacroiliac joint destruction and functional disorder. Few studies in the literature have been presented on SJT, reports of surgical treatment for SJT are even fewer. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed surgical management of patients with severe SJT of 3 different types and proposed to reveal the clinical manifestations and features and aim to determine the efficiency and security of such surgical treatment.Entities:
Keywords: Focal debridement; Joint fusion; Sacroiliac joint tuberculosis
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29187182 PMCID: PMC5708174 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1866-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Patient data
| Patients NO. | Gender | Involved side | Other infected side | Kim’s type | Classificatin of our study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | F | L | – | III | A |
| 2 | F | R | – | II | A |
| 3 | M | R | Lung | IV | B |
| 4 | F | L | Lung | II | A |
| 5 | F | L | – | IV | B |
| 6 | F | L | – | III | A |
| 7 | F | R | – | II | A |
| 8 | M | L | – | IV | B |
| 9 | M | R | – | IV | B |
| 10 | M | R | – | II | A |
| 11 | M | L | Lumbar | IV | C |
| 12 | M | L | Lung | III | A |
| 13 | F | R | Lumbar | IV | C |
| 14 | F | R | – | III | A |
| 15 | M | L | – | II | A |
| 16 | M | R | – | II | A |
| 17 | F | R | Lung | II | A |
Fig. 1CT of patient NO.1 pre- and postoperatively at 3, 6 and 12 months. a Bone destruction and cyst on the sacrum side. b Bone fusion on the sacrum side as early as 3 months after surgery. c More evident bone fusion on both sides of the joint 6 months after surgery. d Solid joint fusion of the sacroiliac joint 12 months after surgery
Fig. 2CT of patient NO.8 pre- and postoperatively at 3, 6 and 12 months. a Severe bone destruction on both sides of the joint; arrow indicates a rupture in the front of the sacroiliac joint capsule, with a sinus tract connecting to the abscess in the iliopsoas. b Ample bone graft in the lesion side and no obvious bone fusion 3 months after surgery. c Bone graft remodeling and no occurrence of bone absorption. d Solid joint fusion within 12 months after surgery
Fig. 3MRI and CT of patient NO.11 pre- and post-operation of 3,6 and 12 months and X-ray of 12 months after surgery. a L4 vertebra was eroded and epidural sac was compressed (b)Arrow indicates a inguinal abscess with a sinus track attaching to iliopsoas abscess. c-e)Procession of sacroiliac joint fusion at 3,6 and 12 months postoperation. Solid joint fusion was found within 12 months postoperation. (f)X-ray indicated solid joint fusion and good instrumentation
Outcome of 17 patients received surgical management
| Outcome | Surgical management and joint fusion( | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Estimate Blood Loss(ml) | 187.6 ± 86.7 | ||||
| Duration of Surgery(min) | 112.6 ± 18.5 | ||||
| Pre-op | Post 7 day | Post 3 month | |||
| ESR(mm/h) | 52.2 ± 23.0 | 36.5 ± 8.8 | 9.3 ± 2.7 | ||
| Time Postoperation | |||||
| Pre-op | 3 | 6 | 12 | 24 | |
| VAS | 6.0 ± 1.7 | 3.0 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 0.5 ± 0.5 | 0.5 ± 0.5 |
| ODI (%) | 62.7 ± 21.4 | 49.7 ± 11.8 | 35.3 ± 11.3 | 3.1 ± 1.7 | 2.7 ± 1.6 |
The normal reference value of ESR in our hospital: <15 mm/h (male), <20 mm/h (female)