| Literature DB >> 29186790 |
Abstract
Due to the symmetry of conventional periodic-permanent-magnet electromagnetic acoustic transducers (PPM EMATs), two shear (SH) waves can be generated and propagated simultaneously in opposite directions, which makes the signal recognition and interpretation complicatedly. Thus, this work presents a new SH wave PPM EMAT design, rotating the parallel line sources to realize the wave beam focusing in a single-direction. The theoretical model of distributed line sources was deduced firstly, and the effects of some parameters, such as the inner coil width, adjacent line sources spacing and the angle between parallel line sources, on SH wave focusing and directivity were studied mainly with the help of 3D FEM. Employing the proposed PPM EMATs, some experiments are carried out to verify the reliability of FEM simulation. The results indicate that rotating the parallel line sources can strength the wave on the closing side of line sources, decreasing the inner coil width and the adjacent line sources spacing can improve the amplitude and directivity of signals excited by transducers. Compared with traditional PPM EMATs, both the capacity of unidirectional excitation and directivity of the proposed PPM EMATs are improved significantly.Entities:
Keywords: PPM EMATs; SH guided-wave; focusing; plate inspection; revolving
Year: 2017 PMID: 29186790 PMCID: PMC5750529 DOI: 10.3390/s17122722
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Distributed line sources models: (a) Conventional PPM EMATs; (b) Proposed PPM EMATs.
Figure 23D FEM of proposed PPM EMATs for inspecting plates.
The size and material parameters of the aluminum plate.
| Parameter | Value | Parameter | Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Length | 500 mm | Conductivity | 3.5E-7 |
| Width | 500 mm | Elasticity modulus | 70 |
| Thickness | 3 mm | Poisson’s ratio | 0.33 |
| Density |
Figure 3Influence of d on performance of PPM EMATs: (a) d-signal amplitude; (b) d-radiated acoustic field.
Figure 4Influence of on performance of PPM EMATs: (a) -signal amplitude; (b) -radiated acoustic field.
Figure 5Effects of on performance of PPM EMATs (d = 20 mm); (a) -signal amplitude; (b) -radiated acoustic field.
Figure 6Effects of on performance of PPM EMATs (d = 60 mm): (a) -signal amplitude; (b) -radiated acoustic field.
Figure 7The experimental setups.
The geometrical parameters of the coils.
| Inner Coil Width ( | Rotation Angle of Line Sources ( | Spacing of Adjacent Line Sources ( | Turns of Coils ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coil I | 10 mm | 0° | 0.905 mm | 25 |
| Coil II | 70 mm | 0° | 0.905 mm | 25 |
| Coil III | 70 mm | 30° | 0.905 mm | 25 |
Figure 8The experimental configuration.
Figure 9The normalized peak-to-peak amplitude of echo on the right end of aluminum plate.