| Literature DB >> 29186774 |
Zhenyu Zhu1,2, Xing Fu1, Dongmei Ren2, Yu Wan2, Ji Wang1.
Abstract
A method for measuring the nonlinearity of laser interferometer using optical frequency tuning technique is presented in this paper. The basic principle of this method is to make the fractional part of an interference fringe change by tuning the laser frequency and determining the nonlinearity of interferometer by comparing the fractional fringe change measured by the interferometer to that calculated from the laser frequency change. An experimental interferometric system with a wavelength tunable laser source is set up and the nonlinearity of the interferometer is measured. Since it does not require the precise displacement mechanism to produce the optical path difference change, this method is more convenient to use and may achieve a higher accuracy than the conventional measurement methods. The nonlinearity of the arbitrary interferometric phase can be measured by changing the laser frequency with this method. Experiments results have shown that the repeatability of nonlinearity measurement is less than 0.2 nm. This method can be applied to interferometry-based high precision dimensional measurements, such as coordinate measurement and displacement sensor calibration.Entities:
Keywords: frequency tuning; interferometry; measurement; nonlinearity
Year: 2017 PMID: 29186774 PMCID: PMC5750799 DOI: 10.3390/s17122721
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Diagram of interferometer for investigating the nonlinearity measurement method.
Figure 2(a) Variation of Lamb dip laser power with frequency; (b) changes of laser frequency with input voltage of piezoelectric ceramic.
Figure 3(a) Interference fringes; (b) interference signals.
Figure 4Experimental setup of nonlinearity measurement.
Figure 5(a) Relationship between displacements measured by interferometer and micro-displacement stage; (b) measurement result of nonlinearity by linear fitting method.
Figure 6(a) Measurement result of nonlinearity by optical frequency tuning method; (b) comparison of the results of two methods; and (c) difference between measurement results of two methods.
Figure 7Standard deviation of nonlinearity measurement (a) with the proposed optical frequency tuning method and (b) with linear fitting method.