Juliana Lacerda Reis Ucelli1, Fabiana de Sousa Borges Rudolph1, Daniel Lago Obadia1,2, Carla da Fontoura Dionello3. 1. Tropical Dermatology Service, Hospital Central do Exército (HCE), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 2. Dermatology Service, Hospital Universitário Pedro Ernesto - Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (HUPE-UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil. 3. Rheumatology Service, Hospital Central do Exército, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Dear Editor,Interstitial granulomatous dermatitis is a rare, idiopathic disease with typical
histopathological characteristics and with a variable clinical expression.[1] In 1993, Ackerman et
al. proposed the term interstitial granulomatous dermatitis with arthritis
(IGDA), to describe the association of the cutaneous cords with changes in the
musculoskeletal system.[2,3] However, other cutaneous lesions have
also been described, such as erythematous or hyperchromic papules, subcutaneous plaques,
and lesions with annular shapes, which generally affect the side walls of the thorax,
armpits, abdomen, and medial surface of the thighs.[3-5]A 47-year-old female patient presented annular asymptomatic lesions in her armpits over
the past year. The lesions had increased in size over the past four months. Upon
ectoscopic examination, the lesion presented a hyperchromic macula with clearly defined
edges and erythematous-purple plaques, with infiltrated edges and an annular shape in
her armpits (Figure 1). A direct mycological exam
and culture to test for fungi were performed, both of which proved to be negative. The
histopathological exam of the right armpit lesion presented perivascular and
interstitial inflammatory infiltrate superficial and deep, comprised of histiocytes that
in some areas are palisading and in other areas, such as the interstice, in addition to
groups of neutrophils and eosinophils (Figure 2).
After two months, the patient returned and reported the appearance of painful and
erythematous nodules on the medial surface of the thighs for the past week. The patient
also reported the appearance of polyarthralgia in the fingers, wrists, and knees
bilaterally. The initial rheumatological evaluation did not show arthritis, despite the
joint pain, and the musculoskeletal system exam presented no significant synovitis or
functional impotence. Laboratory exams were requested to investigate autoimmune
diseases, the results of which were normal; however, some inflammatory functional
results were high (C-reactive proteins (CRP) and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR)).
To combat the patient's rheumatology, Clobetasol Proprionate creme was prescribed for
seven days, to be applied to the armpit lesions and Venlafaxine, 37.5mg/day, to combat
rheumatology.
Figure 1
Left armpit lesions. Hyperchromic macula with defined edges and erythematous-
violet plaques, with infiltrated edges and an annular shape
Figure 2
Histopathological exam under Hematoxylin & eosin x200(HE) staining.
Details of the interstitial infiltrate, comprised of histiocytes,
neutrophils, and eosinophils
Left armpit lesions. Hyperchromic macula with defined edges and erythematous-
violet plaques, with infiltrated edges and an annular shapeHistopathological exam under Hematoxylin & eosin x200(HE) staining.
Details of the interstitial infiltrate, comprised of histiocytes,
neutrophils, and eosinophilsDue to persistent joint pain, changes in the inflammatory results, and a lack of response
to Venlafaxine, magnetic resonance (MR) exams of the hands and wrists were requested.
The radiologist's analysis of the exams, in which a Gadolinium exam was performed,
identified synovitis by hypercaptation in the sequence considered in T1 in some joints,
such as the wrists, and proximal metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints (Figure 3). Prednisone and methotrexate were
prescribed, with excellent clinical and laboratory response. Prednisone was later
discontinued.
Figure 3
Nuclear magnetic resonance of the right hand. Liquid distension in the
sheaths of the flexor tendons of the third finger, at the height of the
middle phalanx, and in the tendinous sheath of the extensors of the second
and fifth fingers, which is more accentuated at the level of the metacarpus,
compatible with tenosynovitis.
Nuclear magnetic resonance of the right hand. Liquid distension in the
sheaths of the flexor tendons of the third finger, at the height of the
middle phalanx, and in the tendinous sheath of the extensors of the second
and fifth fingers, which is more accentuated at the level of the metacarpus,
compatible with tenosynovitis.Systemic involvement in IGDA appears as migratory arthritis or polyarthritis of small and
large joints, which can appear before, during, or after its cutaneous
manifestation.[1,4,5] IGDA mainly
affects middle-aged women, the rheumatoid factor may be positive or not, and it is
associated with a wide range of diseases, such as systemic erythematous lupus,
antiphospholipid antibody syndrome, auto-immune thyroiditis, autoimmune hepatitis,
Churg-Strauss syndrome, Behcet's disease, pulmonary paracoccidioidomycosis, pulmonary
silicosis, chronic uveitis, and paraneoplastic syndrome.[1-5] However, the
most common association is with rheumatoid arthritis.[3]There are reports that some drugs are capable of causing IGDA, such as the
angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium canal blockers, beta-blockers,
hypolipidemic drugs, and alpha-blockers.[3-5] In this patient's case,
joint involvement was investigated, thus excluding, initially, the diagnosis of
autoimmune disease and drugs as causal factors.The differential diagnosis should be performed with Annular Granuloma, Sarcoidosis,
Centrifuge Annular Erythema, Migratory Chronic Erythema of Lyme Disease, Multiform
Erythema, Erythema Elevatum Diutinum, Vasculitis, and Fungoid Mycosis.[1,3]A histopathological skin exam is essential to establish the proper diagnosis. This exam
commonly shows interstitial inflammatory infiltrate, comprised of epithelioid
histiocytes that at times appear in palisading form, with areas of degeneration of the
collagen, with almost no mucinous material. In addition, it is common to see neutrophils
and eosinophils in the infiltrate, which can also contain multinucleated and even
atypical histiocytes.[1,3,5] When associated
with medication, it may be histopathologically distinguishable through the presence of
vacuolar interface dermatitis, exocytosis of lymphocytes, and the absence of
neutrophils.[3]The proposed treatments for IGDA are still not well-defined. Treatment can include the
topical or systemic use of corticosteroids, non-steroid anti-inflammatory drugs,
antimalarial drugs, cyclosporine, methotrexate, dapsone, cyclophosphamide, and anti-TNK
alpha.[3,4,5] In cases in
which the drug is the causal factor, this drug must be discontinued. When the diagnosis
of the subjacent disease is proven, it should be treated, which can bring about a
concomitant improvement in the skin. The cutaneous lesions present a spontaneous
resolution, but they may also present some form of resistance to the
treatment.[3,4]In conclusion, the IGDA is a rare dermatosis that can be secondary to other diseases or
to the use of certain drugs, and for this reason, dermatologists and rheumatologists
should act together in their diagnoses and in their research on subjacent diseases in
their initial stages.
Authors: Joana Antunes; David Pacheco; Ana Rita Travassos; Luís Miguel Soares-Almeida; Paulo Filipe; Manuel Sacramento-Marques Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2012 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 1.896
Authors: Isis Suga Veronez; Fernando Luiz Dantas; Neusa Yuriko Valente; Priscila Kakizaki; Thaís Helena Yasuda; Thaís do Amaral Cunha Journal: An Bras Dermatol Date: 2015-06-01 Impact factor: 1.896