| Literature DB >> 29186069 |
Li Guo1, Weituo Zhao2, Xiaowen Gu3, Xinyun Zhao4, Juan Chen5, Shenggao Cheng6.
Abstract
Background: Mining activities always emit metal(loid)s into the surrounding environment, where their accumulation in the soil may pose risks and hazards to humans and ecosystems. Objective: This paper aims to determine of the type, source, chemical form, fate and transport, and accurate risk assessment of 17 metal(loid) contaminants including As, Cd, Cu, Ni, Pb, Zn, Cr, Ag, B, Bi, Co, Mo, Sb, Ti, V, W and Sn in the soils collected from an abandoned tungsten mining area, and to guide the implementing of appropriate remediation strategies. <br> Methods: Contamination factors (CFs) and integrated pollution indexes (IPIs) and enrichment factors (EFs) were used to assess their ecological risk and the sources were identified by using multivariate statistics analysis, spatial distribution investigation and correlation matrix. <br> Results: The IPI and EF values indicated the soils in the mine site and the closest downstream one were extremely disturbed by metal(loid)s such as As, Bi, W, B, Cu, Pb and Sn, which were emitted from the mining wastes and acid drainages and delivered by the runoff and human activities. Arsenic contamination was detected in nine sites with the highest CF values at 24.70 next to the mining site. The Cd contamination scattered in the paddy soils around the resident areas with higher fraction of bioavailable forms, primarily associated with intense application of phosphorus fertilizer. The lithogenic elements V, Ti, Ag, Ni, Sb, Mo exhibit low contamination in all sampling points and their distribution were depended on the soil texture and pedogenesis process. Conclusions: The long term historical mining activities have caused severe As contamination and higher enrichment of the other elements of orebody in the local soils. The appropriate remediation treatment approach should be proposed to reduce the bioavailability of Cd in the paddy soils and to immobilize As to reclaim the soils around the mining site. Furthermore, alternative fertilizing way and irrigating water sources are urgencies to reduce the input of Cd and As into the local soils effectively.Entities:
Keywords: abandoned tungsten mine; chemical fractionation; metals and metalloids; multivariate geostatistics; risk assessment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29186069 PMCID: PMC5750894 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph14121475
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Location map of the study area and sampling sites.
The site geology and physicochemical properties of top soils in the studied area.
| Site | Geology | Soil Classification a | Land Use | pH | CEC (meq/100 g) | OM (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TY-1 | Alluvial clay and gravel ( | Fluvic Hydragric Anthrosol | Wild grass | 3.9 | 16.32 | 1.23 |
| TY-2 | Alluvial clay and gravel ( | Fluvic Hydragric Anthrosol | Paddy | 4.2 | 17.10 | 3.67 |
| TY-3 | Alluvial clay and gravel ( | Fluvic Hydragric Anthrosol | Vegetable field | 4.5 | 16.52 | 3.86 |
| TY-4 | Alluvial clay and gravel ( | Fluvic Hydragric Anthrosol | Vegetable field | 4.9 | 17.26 | 3.72 |
| TY-5 | Alluvial clay and gravel ( | Fluvic Hydragric Anthrosol | Paddy | 6.2 | 17.32 | 3.62 |
| TY-6 | Alluvial clay and gravel ( | Fluvic Hydragric Anthrosol | Paddy | 5.7 | 16.28 | 3.58 |
| TY-7 | Paralic deposits ( | Sodic Hydragric Anthrosol | Paddy | 6.8 | 18.96 | 3.46 |
| TY-8 | Late Jurassic monzonitic granites (J3ηγ) | Arenosol Lixisol | Forest field | 5.8 | 17.61 | 2.96 |
| TY-9 | Triassic sandy shales and sandy conglomerate (K1ηo) | Dystric Leptosol | Forest field | 4.7 | 16.48 | 2.67 |
| TY-10 | Early Cretaceous Epoch quartzdiorites (T3G) | Arenosol Lixisol | Forest field | 5.1 | 16.52 | 2.98 |
| TY-11 | Early Cretaceous Epoch quartzdiorites (T3G) | Arenosol Lixisol | Forest field | 4.9 | 16.21 | 3.00 |
a According to the World Reference Base for Soils [20]; CEC: Cation Exchange Capacity; OM: Organic Matter.
Concentrations and enrichment factors (EFs) of metal(loid)s in top soils from the study area.
| Sample | As | Cd | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (mg/kg) | Concentration (mg/kg) | Concentration (mg/kg) | Concentration (mg/kg) | Concentration (mg/kg) | Concentration (mg/kg) | |||||||
| TY-1 | 219.8 ± 0.7 | 19.64 | 0.149 ± 0.003 | 2.12 | 88.7 ± 1.2 | 4.15 | 13.6 ± 0.3 | 0.75 | 133.5 ± 1.2 | 2.95 | 150.7 ± 1.4 | 2.53 |
| TY-2 | 10.8 ± 0.2 | 2.06 | 0.069 ± 0.002 | 2.09 | 7.4 ± 0.1 | 0.74 | 5.6 ± 0.4 | 0.66 | 32.3 ± 0.7 | 1.52 | 59.6 ± 0.8 | 2.14 |
| TY-3 | 181.8 ± 0.4 | 11.90 | 0.171 ± 0.002 | 1.78 | 80.9 ± 0.9 | 2.77 | 15.5 ± 0.2 | 0.63 | 99.0 ± 0.6 | 1.60 | 131.2 ± 0.6 | 1.62 |
| TY-4 | 68.5 ± 0.8 | 4.60 | 0.209 ± 0.009 | 2.23 | 39.3 ± 0.5 | 1.38 | 13.8 ± 0.3 | 0.57 | 75.8 ± 1.6 | 1.26 | 116.4 ± 0.8 | 1.47 |
| TY-5 | 52.4 ± 0.7 | 3.86 | 0.193 ± 0.002 | 2.26 | 28.8 ± 0.4 | 1.11 | 15.8 ± 0.1 | 0.72 | 76.2 ± 1.3 | 1.39 | 97.1 ± 0.9 | 1.35 |
| TY-6 | 43.8 ± 0.2 | 3.78 | 0.348 ± 0.001 | 4.77 | 27.7 ± 0.3 | 1.25 | 13.7 ± 0.5 | 0.73 | 136.8 ± 0.7 | 2.92 | 137.3 ± 0.8 | 2.23 |
| TY-7 | 57.8 ± 0.8 | 4.28 | 0.333 ± 0.004 | 3.92 | 34.6 ± 0.6 | 1.34 | 16.8 ± 0.2 | 0.77 | 118.1 ± 0.9 | 2.16 | 156.4 ± 0.9 | 2.18 |
| TY-8 | 61.6 ± 0.3 | 5.77 | 0.099 ± 0.001 | 1.47 | 11.4 ± 0.3 | 0.56 | 17.4 ± 0.4 | 1.01 | 42.4 ± 0.3 | 0.98 | 61.8 ± 0.6 | 1.09 |
| TY-9 | 35.9 ± 0.2 | 7.76 | 0.072 ± 0.001 | 2.47 | 9.2 ± 0.6 | 1.04 | 5.0 ± 0.1 | 0.67 | 139.8 ± 1.1 | 7.47 | 48.5 ± 0.4 | 1.97 |
| TY-10 | 18.1 ± 0.4 | 1.07 | 0.136 ± 0.002 | 1.28 | 7.1 ± 0.3 | 0.22 | 6.3 ± 0.1 | 0.23 | 58.2 ± 0.6 | 0.85 | 130.3 ± 0.8 | 1.45 |
| TY-11 | 49.2 ± 0.3 | 2.25 | 0.213 ± 0.003 | 1.55 | 112.9 ± 1.2 | 2.70 | 26.7 ± 0.2 | 0.75 | 85.3 ± 0.8 | 0.96 | 292.9 ± 1.5 | 2.52 |
| Max | 219.8 | 19.64 | 0.348 | 4.77 | 112.9 | 4.15 | 26.7 | 1.01 | 139.8 | 7.47 | 292.9 | 2.53 |
| Min | 10.8 | 1.07 | 0.069 | 1.28 | 7.1 | 0.22 | 5.0 | 0.23 | 32.3 | 0.85 | 48.5 | 1.09 |
| Mean | 72.7 | 6.09 | 0.181 | 2.36 | 40.7 | 1.57 | 13.6 | 0.68 | 90.7 | 2.19 | 125.6 | 1.87 |
| SD | 66.23 | 5.41 | 0.093 | 1.07 | 36.8 | 1.17 | 6.3 | 0.19 | 38.0 | 1.90 | 67.1 | 0.50 |
| BV a | 8.9 | 0.056 | 17.0 | 14.4 | 36 | 47.3 | ||||||
| MAC b | 25 | 0.30 | 100 | 50 | 300 | 250 | ||||||
BV: background value; MAC: maximum allowable concentration. a background values of elements in the soils of Guangdong Province (CNEMC, China National Environmental Monitoring Center, 1990 [27]); b The maximum allowable concentrations of contaminants in Chinese soils (EPAC, Environmental protection Administration of China, 2008 [40]).
Figure 2The metal(loid) concentrations in the soils of three different layers.
Metal contamination factors (CFs) and pollution load indexes (IPIs) for metals in top soils from the study area.
| Sample | Contamination Factors ( | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As | Cd | Cu | Ni | Pb | Zn | Cr | Ag | B | Bi | Co | Mo | Sb | Ti | V | W | Sn | ||
| TY-1 | 24.70 | 2.66 | 5.21 | 0.94 | 3.71 | 3.19 | 0.86 | 4.20 | 9.17 | 24.26 | 1.67 | 0.16 | 2.61 | 1.65 | 0.92 | 41.27 | 6.19 | 3.36 |
| TY-2 | 1.21 | 1.23 | 0.43 | 0.39 | 0.89 | 1.26 | 0.16 | 0.67 | 1.01 | 0.98 | 0.71 | 0.15 | 1.11 | 0.59 | 0.26 | 0.57 | 1.00 | 0.62 |
| TY-3 | 20.43 | 3.05 | 4.76 | 1.07 | 2.75 | 2.77 | 0.89 | 4.84 | 9.17 | 15.68 | 2.88 | 0.16 | 2.70 | 1.72 | 0.98 | 17.07 | 5.96 | 3.16 |
| TY-4 | 7.69 | 3.73 | 2.31 | 0.96 | 2.11 | 2.46 | 0.87 | 2.31 | 9.17 | 4.93 | 1.43 | 0.11 | 3.13 | 1.67 | 0.92 | 2.44 | 4.98 | 2.10 |
| TY-5 | 5.89 | 3.44 | 1.69 | 1.09 | 2.12 | 2.05 | 0.92 | 1.79 | 4.20 | 3.11 | 1.50 | 0.14 | 2.0 | 1.52 | 1.07 | 3.39 | 2.91 | 1.81 |
| TY-6 | 4.92 | 6.21 | 1.63 | 0.95 | 3.80 | 2.90 | 0.84 | 2.69 | 2.47 | 2.46 | 1.10 | 0.11 | 1.69 | 1.30 | 0.81 | 2.0 | 3.98 | 1.74 |
| TY-7 | 6.49 | 5.95 | 2.03 | 1.17 | 3.28 | 3.31 | 0.93 | 3.65 | 3.63 | 4.93 | 1.89 | 0.14 | 2.43 | 1.52 | 1.11 | 6.48 | 3.31 | 2.30 |
| TY-8 | 6.93 | 1.77 | 0.67 | 1.21 | 1.18 | 1.31 | 0.74 | 1.39 | 4.10 | 0.46 | 1.64 | 0.19 | 2.24 | 1.20 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.57 | 1.13 |
| TY-9 | 4.03 | 1.29 | 0.54 | 0.35 | 3.88 | 1.02 | 0.33 | 0.88 | 0.53 | 2.07 | 0.61 | 0.49 | 1.93 | 0.52 | 0.29 | 0.83 | 1.67 | 0.90 |
| TY-10 | 2.03 | 2.43 | 0.42 | 0.44 | 1.62 | 2.75 | 0.37 | 1.50 | 0.45 | 0.87 | 2.04 | 0.25 | 2.85 | 1.90 | 1.30 | 0.65 | 1.19 | 1.05 |
| TY-11 | 5.53 | 3.80 | 6.64 | 1.85 | 2.37 | 6.19 | 0.98 | 8.11 | 2.49 | 4.83 | 2.07 | 0.25 | 2.98 | 2.46 | 1.74 | 2.55 | 3.57 | 2.70 |
Figure 3Spatial distribution of metals in the surface soils of the studied area.
Principal component loading (varimax normalization) for metals of top soils in the study area.
| Parameter | PC1 | PC2 | PC3 | PC4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| V | −0.052 | 0.188 | 0.098 | |
| Ti | 0.124 | 0.129 | 0.172 | |
| Zn | 0.044 | 0.384 | −0.122 | |
| Ag | 0.282 | 0.358 | −0.136 | |
| Sb | 0.286 | −0.104 | 0.037 | |
| Ni | 0.051 | 0.377 | 0.219 | |
| Co | 0.331 | −0.049 | 0.265 | |
| Cu | 0.556 | 0.246 | −0.114 | |
| As | 0.165 | 0.039 | 0.061 | |
| Bi | 0.175 | 0.070 | −0.044 | |
| W | 0.077 | 0.039 | −0.057 | |
| B | 0.184 | 0.037 | 0.435 | |
| Sn | 0.280 | 0.431 | 0.137 | |
| Cd | 0.236 | −0.077 | 0.294 | |
| P | 0.438 | 0.169 | 0.120 | |
| Pb | −0.104 | 0.433 | −0.499 | |
| Cr | 0.553 | 0.332 | 0.349 | |
| Mo | −0.091 | −0.154 | −0.254 | |
| Eigenvalues | 6.164 | 4.998 | 3.089 | 1.704 |
| % of variance | 34.244 | 27.767 | 17.163 | 9.464 |
| Cumulative % | 34.244 | 62.012 | 79.175 | 88.639 |
The bold indicate: the significance of a parameter in a specific principle component. Significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 4Dendgram of target metals and phosphorus using hierarchical clustering analysis for parameters.
Figure 5Chemical fractionations of Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb and As in surface (see in the left column), middle (see in the middle column) and deep soils (see in the right column) of the study area (F1, F2, F3, F4, F5, F6 and F7 represent water soluble, exchangeable, carbonate-bound, humic acid-bound, Fe and Mn oxide-bound, refractory organic matter-bound, and residual fractions, respectively).