Literature DB >> 29185837

Effects of Negative Affect, Urge to Smoke, and Working Memory Performance (n-back) on Nicotine Dependence.

William V Lechner1,2, Rachel L Gunn2, Alexia Minto3, Noah S Philip4,5, Richard A Brown6, Lisa A Uebelacker3,4, Lawrence H Price3,4, Ana M Abrantes3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Three key domains including negative emotionality, incentive salience, and executive function form the core functional elements of addictive behaviors. Variables related to these broader domains have been studied extensively in relation to one another; however, no studies to date, have examined models including variables from all three domains, in relation to nicotine dependence.
METHOD: Smokers (N = 117), 65.8% female, 78% white, mean age of 44.4 (SD = 10.8), enrolled in a smoking cessation program completed measures of negative affect (a component of negative emotionality), urge to smoke (incentive salience), and working memory (WM; a core executive function), during a baseline assessment period prior to initiating treatment.
RESULTS: Negative affect was associated with greater urge to smoke, and this elevated urge to smoke was associated with higher levels of nicotine dependence. Further, a significant moderated mediation indicated that WM moderated the relationship between increased urge to smoke and nicotine dependence. For those with low to average WM, urge to smoke was significantly related to nicotine dependence; however, for those with higher WM (+1 SD), urge to smoke stemming from negative affect was not associated with nicotine dependence.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first reported relationship between negative affect, urge to smoke, WM, and nicotine dependence. Although preliminary, results indicate that WM may moderate the relationship between urge to smoke associated with negative affect and nicotine dependence. Treatments targeting WM may be particularly useful for individuals with average to low WM who experience urge to smoke related to negative affect.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Nicotine dependence; d prime; executive function; incentive salience; n-back; negative affect; working memory

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29185837      PMCID: PMC7376498          DOI: 10.1080/10826084.2017.1400569

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Subst Use Misuse        ISSN: 1082-6084            Impact factor:   2.164


  39 in total

1.  Determinants of tobacco use and renaming the FTND to the Fagerstrom Test for Cigarette Dependence.

Authors:  Karl Fagerström
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 4.244

2.  Brain activity in cigarette smokers performing a working memory task: effect of smoking abstinence.

Authors:  Jiansong Xu; Adrianna Mendrek; Mark S Cohen; John Monterosso; Paul Rodriguez; Sara L Simon; Arthur Brody; Murray Jarvik; Catherine P Domier; Richard Olmstead; Monique Ernst; Edythe D London
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2005-07-15       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODCLIN.

Authors:  David P MacKinnon; Matthew S Fritz; Jason Williams; Chondra M Lockwood
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08

4.  Working memory-related neural activity predicts future smoking relapse.

Authors:  James Loughead; E Paul Wileyto; Kosha Ruparel; Mary Falcone; Ryan Hopson; Ruben Gur; Caryn Lerman
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Predictors of outcome and recidivism in smoking cessation treatment.

Authors:  O Pomerleau; D Adkins; M Pertschuk
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 6.  A dual-systems perspective on addiction: contributions from neuroimaging and cognitive training.

Authors:  Samuel M McClure; Warren K Bickel
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 5.691

7.  Exposure to negative affect cues and urge to smoke.

Authors:  Christine Vinci; Amy L Copeland; Maureen H Carrigan
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Remember the future: working memory training decreases delay discounting among stimulant addicts.

Authors:  Warren K Bickel; Richard Yi; Reid D Landes; Paul F Hill; Carole Baxter
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 9.  From prediction error to incentive salience: mesolimbic computation of reward motivation.

Authors:  Kent C Berridge
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Positive and negative affect as predictors of urge to smoke: temporal factors and mediational pathways.

Authors:  Adam M Leventhal; Jodie B Greenberg; Michael A Trujillo; Katherine J Ameringer; Nadra E Lisha; Raina D Pang; John Monterosso
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2013-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.