Literature DB >> 29185673

Sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Jeffrey A How1, Patrick O'Farrell1, Zainab Amajoud1, Susie Lau1, Shannon Salvador1, Emily How1, Walter H Gotlieb2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Appropriate extent of lymphadenectomy in clinically, early stage endometrial cancer remains controversial but sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping has emerged as an alternative staging strategy, until the advent of molecular prognostic markers. We sought to perform a systematic review of the literature to determine pooled estimates for SLN detection rate and diagnostic accuracy, while exploring impact of the SLN on adjuvant therapy and oncologic outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a systematic search utilizing Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science electronic databases for all studies published in the English language until October 31, 2017. Studies were included for review and potential aggregate analyses if they contained at least 30 endometrial cancer patients with undergoing SLN mapping and reported on detection rates (overall, bilateral or para-aortic) or diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and negative predictive value [NPV]). Pooled estimates were calculated via meta-analyses utilizing a random-effects model. Studies reporting on the impact of SLN on adjuvant therapy, as well as studies comparing SLN mapping to completion lymphadenectomy were qualitatively reviewed and analyzed as well. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 48 eligible studies, which included 5348 patients for review and inclusion in the meta-analysis for SLN detection or diagnostic accuracy. The pooled SLN detection rates were were 87% (95% CI: 84-89%, 44 studies) for overall detection, 61% (95% CI: 56-66%, 36 studies) for bilateral detection, and 6% (95% CI: 3-9%, 31 studies) for para-aortic detection. Indocyanine green use improved overall (94%, 95% CI: 92-96%, 19 studies) SLN detection rates compared to blue tracer (86%, 95% CI: 83-89%, 31 studies) or technetium-99 (86%, 95% CI: 83-89%, 25 studies). This trend was similarly seen in terms of bilateral detection rates (74% vs. 59% vs. 57%, respectively). There was no difference in para-aortic SLN detection rate between each tracer. The pooled estimates for diagnostic accuracy for 34 studies were 94% (95% CI: 91-96%) for sensitivity and 100% (95% CI: 99 - 100%) for NPV. Diagnostic accuracy of SLN mapping was not negatively affected in patients with high-grade endometrial histology. Patients with SLN mapping are more likely to receive adjuvant therapy and do not have inferior survival or recurrence outcomes compared to those undergoing completion lymphadenectomy.
CONCLUSIONS: SLN mapping is a feasible and accurate alternative to stage patients with endometrial cancer. Utilizing indocyanine green results in the highest SLN detection rates. Future studies should prospectively examine the impact of SLN mapping on progression-free and overall survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29185673     DOI: 10.23736/S0026-4784.17.04179-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Ginecol        ISSN: 0026-4784


  15 in total

1.  Accuracy of One-Step Nucleic Acid Amplification in Detecting Lymph Node Metastases in Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Antonio Raffone; Antonio Travaglino; Angela Santoro; Italia Esposito; Giuseppe Angelico; Saveria Spadola; Gian Franco Zannoni
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2019-08-23       Impact factor: 3.201

2.  ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Nicole Concin; Carien L Creutzberg; Ignace Vergote; David Cibula; Mansoor Raza Mirza; Simone Marnitz; Jonathan A Ledermann; Tjalling Bosse; Cyrus Chargari; Anna Fagotti; Christina Fotopoulou; Antonio González-Martín; Sigurd F Lax; Domenica Lorusso; Christian Marth; Philippe Morice; Remi A Nout; Dearbhaile E O'Donnell; Denis Querleu; Maria Rosaria Raspollini; Jalid Sehouli; Alina E Sturdza; Alexandra Taylor; Anneke M Westermann; Pauline Wimberger; Nicoletta Colombo; François Planchamp; Xavier Matias-Guiu
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Predictive Score of Nodal Involvement in Endometrial Cancer Patients: A Large Multicentre Series.

Authors:  Vito Andrea Capozzi; Giulio Sozzi; Andrea Rosati; Stefano Restaino; Giulia Gambino; Alessandra Cianciolo; Marcello Ceccaroni; Stefano Uccella; Massimo Franchi; Vito Chiantera; Giovanni Scambia; Francesco Fanfani; Roberto Berretta
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2021-11-26       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 4.  Lymphatic Mapping and Sentinel Node Biopsy in High-Grade Uterine Cancers.

Authors:  Jeffrey A How; Michael Frumovitz; Katherine I Stewart; Pamela T Soliman
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.945

5.  Survival and recurrence in stage II endometrial cancers in relation to uterine risk stratification after introduction of lymph node resection and omission of postoperative radiotherapy: a Danish Gynecological Cancer Group Study.

Authors:  Gitte Ørtoft; Claus Høgdall; Estrid S Hansen; Margit Dueholm
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  Cancer field surgery in endometrial cancer: peritoneal mesometrial resection and targeted compartmental lymphadenectomy for locoregional control.

Authors:  Paul Buderath; Peter Rusch; Pawel Mach; Rainer Kimmig
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 4.401

7.  Evaluation of Pre-Therapeutic Assessment in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

Authors:  Caroline Bouche; Manuel Gomes David; Julia Salleron; Philippe Rauch; Léa Leufflen; Julie Buhler; Frédéric Marchal
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-12-04

8.  Utility of Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging in Gynecologic Surgery: Systematic Review and Consensus Statement.

Authors:  Ignacio Zapardiel; Julio Alvarez; Manel Barahona; Pere Barri; Ana Boldo; Pera Bresco; Isabel Gasca; Ibon Jaunarena; Ali Kucukmetin; Gloria Mancebo; Borja Otero; Fernando Roldan; Ramón Rovira; Enma Suarez; Alvaro Tejerizo; Anna Torrent; Mikel Gorostidi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Lirong Zhai; Xiwen Zhang; Manhua Cui; Jianliu Wang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  Sentinel node biopsy for diagnosis of lymph node involvement in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Hans Nagar; Nina Wietek; Richard J Goodall; Will Hughes; Mia Schmidt-Hansen; Jo Morrison
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-06-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.