Literature DB >> 29185240

Insufficient recruitment and premature discontinuation of clinical trials in Switzerland: qualitative study with trialists and other stakeholders.

Matthias Briel1, Bernice Elger2, Erik von Elm3, Priya Satalkar4.   

Abstract

AIMS OF THE STUDY: Premature discontinuation occurs in about 25% of randomised clinical trials in Switzerland; it mainly affects investigator-initiated trials and is mostly due to problems with recruitment of patients. The aim of this study was to qualitatively investigate reasons for trial discontinuation due to poor patient recruitment and suggestions to address those reasons in the Swiss context.
METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with trialists whose trials were discontinued because of recruitment problems, other experienced trialists, and stakeholders in clinical research in Switzerland. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and anonymised. We analysed the transcripts using deductive coding and built up themes that were continuously discussed within the research team.
RESULTS: Of 65 invited Swiss trialists and stakeholders, 39 (60%) agreed to be interviewed and contributed to this analysis. We identified four main themes of reasons for poor recruitment: (1) Switzerland has a decentralised healthcare system with many small hospitals and few patients per hospital, many research regulations, no standardisation of medical records across hospitals, and a heterogeneous ethics assessment of study protocols. There is little collaboration of different stakeholders in clinical research and a lack of prioritisation of projects. (2) Limited human and financial resources, especially in the academic setting, compromise research questions and size of clinical trials. When funding is used up this typically triggers discontinuation of already delayed clinical trials. (3) Investigators face underdeveloped research networks and a limited collaborative attitude among clinical researchers. They typically embark on clinical studies with a great deal of optimism but insufficient preparation. (4) Swiss patients have universal health coverage and many treatment options. Negative media coverage of clinical research and a lack of accessible information for patients about ongoing clinical studies frequently make participation in clinical trials less attractive. More interactive structures and collaboration across stakeholders were mentioned as potential solutions to tackle the problems.
CONCLUSIONS: Recruitment of participants into clinical trials in Switzerland is challenging because of various, often interlinked factors related to the Swiss health system, available funding, investigators, and patients. Common goals and concerted efforts by involved stakeholders appear necessary to achieve improvement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29185240     DOI: 10.4414/smw.2017.14556

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly        ISSN: 0036-7672            Impact factor:   2.193


  9 in total

1.  Optimizing clinical trial design using prospective cohort study data: a case study in neuro-urology.

Authors:  Collene E Anderson; Veronika Birkhäuser; Stephanie A Stalder; Lucas M Bachmann; Armin Curt; Xavier Jordan; Lorenz Leitner; Martina D Liechti; Ulrich Mehnert; Sandra Möhr; Jürgen Pannek; Martin Schubert; Stéphanie van der Lely; Thomas M Kessler; Martin W G Brinkhof
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 2.772

2.  Discrete choice experiment (DCE) to quantify the influence of trial features on the decision to participate in cystic fibrosis (CF) clinical trials.

Authors:  Rebecca Anne Dobra; Marco Boeri; Stuart Elborn; Frank Kee; Susan Madge; Jane C Davies
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Investigational medicinal products, related costs and hospital pharmacy services for investigator-initiated trials: A mixed-methods study.

Authors:  Ala Taji Heravi; Anne Henn; Stefanie Deuster; Stuart McLennan; Viktoria Gloy; Vera Ruth Mitter; Matthias Briel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Barriers and Facilitating Factors for Conducting Systematic Evidence Assessments in Academic Clinical Trials.

Authors:  Stuart McLennan; Barbara Nussbaumer-Streit; Lars G Hemkens; Matthias Briel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-11-01

5.  Cross-sectional survey of parental barriers to participation in pediatric participant research registries.

Authors:  Rebecca A Slotkowski; Shirley F Delair; Kari A Neemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 6.  Going the Extra Mile: Why Clinical Research in Cystic Fibrosis Must Include Children.

Authors:  Rebecca Dobra; Siân Bentley; Claire Edmondson; Maxine Ovens; Clare Saunders; Christopher Short; Gemma Wilson; Jane C Davies; Andrew Bush
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-20

7.  Reducing research waste by promoting informed responses to invitations to participate in clinical trials.

Authors:  Katie Gillies; Iain Chalmers; Paul Glasziou; Diana Elbourne; Jim Elliott; Shaun Treweek
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 2.279

8.  Comparison of randomized controlled trials discontinued or revised for poor recruitment and completed trials with the same research question: a matched qualitative study.

Authors:  Matthias Briel; Benjamin Speich; Erik von Elm; Viktoria Gloy
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.279

9.  Practices and Attitudes of Swiss Stakeholders Regarding Investigator-Initiated Clinical Trial Funding Acquisition and Cost Management.

Authors:  Stuart McLennan; Alexandra Griessbach; Matthias Briel
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-06-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.