Renata Costa de Morais1, Renata Espíndola Silveira1, Michelle Chinelatti1, Saulo Geraldeli2, Fernanda de Carvalho Panzeri Pires-de-Souza3. 1. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FORP-USP), Av. do Café s/n, Bairro Monte Alegre, CEP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil. 2. Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, Division of Operative Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA. 3. Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Ribeirão Preto School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo (FORP-USP), Av. do Café s/n, Bairro Monte Alegre, CEP, Ribeirão Preto, SP, 14040-904, Brazil. ferpanzeri@usp.br.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a Biosilicate®, associated with dentin adhesive system, on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to sound and demineralized dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty sound-extracted molars had their middle occlusal dentin exposed. In forty teeth, dentin was artificially demineralized (pH cycling). Sound and demineralized dentin teeth were separated into four groups (n = 10), according to the substrate treatment before restoration: Group 1-total-etching adhesive Adper TM Single bond 2 (ASB) + Biosilicate®, Group 2-ASB (without Biosilicate®), Group 3-AdheSE self-etching adhesive system (AdSE) + Biosilicate®, and Group 4-AdSE (without Biosilicate®). Each tooth was restored with a hybrid composite and stored in water at 37 °C for 6 months. After water aging, teeth were cut in sticks (≈ 1 mm2 cross-sectional area) and all samples were submitted to μTBS test. The fracture modes of the samples were analyzed by stereomicroscopy. The representatively fractured samples were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Representative samples of each group were analyzed on energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX). The μTBS and Ca-P ratio values were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA, Bonferroni, and Tukey test, respectively, p < .05. RESULTS: ASB + Biosilicate® presented the highest μTBS values (p < .05), and lowest μTBS values (p < .05) were found in AdSE Group. There was no statistical difference (p < .05) on μTBS when substrates were compared, except for Group 2. The fracture pattern analysis showed prevalence of adhesive fractures in all groups. CONCLUSION: Biosilicate® enhanced bond strength of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives to sound and demineralized dentin. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Bioactive glass ceramic suspension could be recommended to be used to improve the dentin bond strengths of the total-etching and self-etching adhesives after acid-etching and priming.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a Biosilicate®, associated with dentin adhesive system, on microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to sound and demineralized dentin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty sound-extracted molars had their middle occlusal dentin exposed. In forty teeth, dentin was artificially demineralized (pH cycling). Sound and demineralized dentin teeth were separated into four groups (n = 10), according to the substrate treatment before restoration: Group 1-total-etching adhesive Adper TM Single bond 2 (ASB) + Biosilicate®, Group 2-ASB (without Biosilicate®), Group 3-AdheSE self-etching adhesive system (AdSE) + Biosilicate®, and Group 4-AdSE (without Biosilicate®). Each tooth was restored with a hybrid composite and stored in water at 37 °C for 6 months. After water aging, teeth were cut in sticks (≈ 1 mm2 cross-sectional area) and all samples were submitted to μTBS test. The fracture modes of the samples were analyzed by stereomicroscopy. The representatively fractured samples were observed by scanning electron microscopy. Representative samples of each group were analyzed on energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX). The μTBS and Ca-P ratio values were analyzed by 2-way ANOVA, Bonferroni, and Tukey test, respectively, p < .05. RESULTS:ASB + Biosilicate® presented the highest μTBS values (p < .05), and lowest μTBS values (p < .05) were found in AdSE Group. There was no statistical difference (p < .05) on μTBS when substrates were compared, except for Group 2. The fracture pattern analysis showed prevalence of adhesive fractures in all groups. CONCLUSION: Biosilicate® enhanced bond strength of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesives to sound and demineralized dentin. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Bioactive glass ceramic suspension could be recommended to be used to improve the dentin bond strengths of the total-etching and self-etching adhesives after acid-etching and priming.
Authors: M Yoshiyama; F R Tay; J Doi; Y Nishitani; T Yamada; K Itou; R M Carvalho; M Nakajima; D H Pashley Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Aline de A Neves; Eduardo Coutinho; Marcio V Cardoso; Jan de Munck; Bart Van Meerbeek Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2011-04-13 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Renata N Granito; Ana Claudia Rennó; Christian Ravagnani; Paulo S Bossini; Daniel Mochiuti; Vanda Jorgetti; Patricia Driusso; Oscar Peitl; Edgar D Zanotto; Nivaldo A Parizotto; Jorge Oishi Journal: J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater Date: 2011-02-02 Impact factor: 3.368
Authors: L M Barcelos; M G Borges; C J Soares; M S Menezes; V Huynh; M G Logan; A P P Fugolin; C S Pfeifer Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2020-01-28 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Yuncong Li; Xiaoyi Hu; Yang Xia; Yadong Ji; Jianping Ruan; Michael D Weir; Xiaoying Lin; Zhihong Nie; Ning Gu; Radi Masri; Xiaofeng Chang; Hockin H K Xu Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 5.304