Literature DB >> 29184893

Global mHealth policy arena: status check and future directions.

Donna M Malvey1, Donna J Slovensky2.   

Abstract

In this review, we examine an important piece of the mHealth puzzle that has received scant attention-health policy. The question is whether health policy ultimately will serve to unite nations in advancing global mHealth or, as Mars and Scott suggested in 2010, keep nations isolated and ultimately making their policy decisions in "eHealth silos". Such a non-collaborative approach seriously hampers the potential for using mobile health technologies to deliver health care across borders, assuring individuals access to affordable, convenient, and quality healthcare in underserved regions. From a global perspective, mHealth policy review is difficult as some important policies may be subsumed in comprehensive planning and strategy documents. Political, environmental, economic, organizational, and technology disparities across nations represent a significant impediment to developing mHealth products and services that can be deployed globally. To date, there is modest evidence that such challenges are being addressed. Even though payers can encourage adoption of mHealth with financial incentives for use, it appears that payment or reimbursement tends to be a roadblock for almost all nations, whether they are emerging or developed. If payment for mHealth services is not guaranteed, business models will not be sustainable and providers will have fewer opportunities for scalability. Furthermore, because mHealth policies typically are subject to some type of government scrutiny and oversight, many product developers and entrepreneurs may turn elsewhere for their investments. Global resource scarcity also challenges optimal mHealth deployment, and governments seek to ensure improved population health outcomes as return on their mHealth investments. Unfortunately, such justification is difficult as evaluation methods simply have not kept pace with mHealth technology capability. Requisite measurement tools are sorely lacking when it comes to evaluating efficacy of mHealth interventions, due in part to insufficient research to inform development of needed measurement tools. Because most robust mHealth research trials have been conducted in the developed world with its impressive technology infrastructure and not in developing nations where the health needs are greatest, evaluation of mobile technology intervention from a global perspective tends to be insufficient to inform policy decisions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  global health policy; health policy; mHealth

Year:  2017        PMID: 29184893      PMCID: PMC5682366          DOI: 10.21037/mhealth.2017.09.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mhealth        ISSN: 2306-9740


  4 in total

1.  Dimensions of health system reform.

Authors:  J Frenk
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1994-01-31       Impact factor: 2.980

2.  Global e-health policy: a work in progress.

Authors:  Maurice Mars; Richard E Scott
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  The triple aim: care, health, and cost.

Authors:  Donald M Berwick; Thomas W Nolan; John Whittington
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

4.  Key Strategic Trends that Impact Healthcare Decision-Making and Stakeholder Roles in the New Marketplace.

Authors:  John Santilli; F Randy Vogenberg
Journal:  Am Health Drug Benefits       Date:  2015-02
  4 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  [Digital public health-an overview].

Authors:  Hajo Zeeb; Iris Pigeot; Benjamin Schüz
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Bridging the digital health divide: toward equitable global access to mobile health interventions for people living with HIV.

Authors:  Breanna R Campbell; Karen S Ingersoll; Tabor E Flickinger; Rebecca Dillingham
Journal:  Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.091

Review 3.  Emerging Artificial Intelligence-Empowered mHealth: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Paras Bhatt; Jia Liu; Yanmin Gong; Jing Wang; Yuanxiong Guo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2022-06-09       Impact factor: 4.947

Review 4.  Challenges in the development of digital public health interventions and mapped solutions: Findings from a scoping review.

Authors:  Ihoghosa Iyamu; Oralia Gómez-Ramírez; Alice Xt Xu; Hsiu-Ju Chang; Sarah Watt; Geoff Mckee; Mark Gilbert
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-05-26

5.  Exploring the Shift in International Trends in Mobile Health Research From 2000 to 2020: Bibliometric Analysis.

Authors:  Jianfei Cao; Yeongjoo Lim; Shintaro Sengoku; Xitong Guo; Kota Kodama
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 4.773

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.