Literature DB >> 29183702

Minimally invasive hepatectomy conversions: an analysis of risk factors and outcomes.

Jack P Silva1, Nicholas G Berger1, Ziyan Yin2, Ying Liu2, Susan Tsai1, Kathleen K Christians1, Callisia N Clarke1, Harveshp Mogal1, T Clark Gamblin3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Surgical approach may influence morbidity following hepatectomy. This study sought to compare outcomes in minimally invasive surgery (MIS), conversion from MIS to open, and planned open hepatectomy patients and analyze factors leading to conversion.
METHODS: The 2014 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset was queried for patients undergoing hepatectomy. Patients were divided into three cohorts: MIS, open, or conversion. Propensity matching was performed to compare MIS vs. conversion (3:1) and open vs. conversion (8:1). The logistic regression model was used to identify odds ratios for conversion.
RESULTS: Patients undergoing conversion had a higher transfusion rate (26% vs. 9%, p < 0.001), longer length of stay (5 vs. 3 days, p < 0.001), and higher morbidity (38% vs. 18%, p < 0.001) than MIS patients. Patients who underwent conversion had similar short-term outcomes to those who had planned open procedures. Independent predictors of conversion included hypertension (OR 1.91; 95% CI 1.12-3.26) and right lobectomy (OR 20.23; 95% CI 3.74-109.35).
CONCLUSION: Patients with hypertension and those undergoing right lobectomy had a higher risk of conversion to open procedure. Conversion resulted in higher morbidity and longer length of stay compared to MIS patients, but outcomes were similar to planned open procedures.
Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29183702     DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.06.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HPB (Oxford)        ISSN: 1365-182X            Impact factor:   3.647


  7 in total

1.  Contemporary practice and short-term outcomes after liver resections in a complete national cohort.

Authors:  Kristoffer Lassen; Linn Såve Nymo; Frank Olsen; Kristoffer Watten Brudvik; Åsmund Avdem Fretland; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  The risk factors of intraoperative conversion during laparoscopic hepatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lian Li; Liangliang Xu; Peng Wang; Ming Zhang; Bo Li
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  A novel scoring system for conversion and complication in laparoscopic liver resection.

Authors:  Yifan Tong; Zheyong Li; Lin Ji; Yifan Wang; Weijia Wang; Jiangbo Ying; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.293

4.  Risk factors and long-term implications of unplanned conversion during laparoscopic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma located in anterolateral liver segments.

Authors:  Hyojin Shin; Jai Young Cho; Ho-Seong Han; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Hae Won Lee; Jun Suh Lee; Boram Lee; Moonhwan Kim; Yeongsoo Jo
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-12-15

5.  How to minimize conversion to open surgery during laparoscopic liver resection: the point of view of hemostasis.

Authors:  Seunghwan Lee
Journal:  J Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  Unplanned conversion during minimally invasive liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: risk factors and surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Jee Yeon Lee; Seoung Yoon Rho; Dai Hoon Han; Jin Sub Choi; Gi Hong Choi
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 7.  Laparoscopic living-donor hepatectomy: Review of its current status.

Authors:  Shigeru Marubashi; Hiroaki Nagano
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2021-03-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.