Literature DB >> 29183032

Return to Work of Cancer Survivors.

Ulf Seifart1, Jan Schmielau.   

Abstract

Due to improving treatment options, the number of so-called long-term cancer survivors is steadily increasing. Current studies assume that more than 60% of adults survive their cancer. These patients have a variety of problems (chemotherapy-induced neuropathy, fatigue, etc.) that require very special care. In addition to somatic and psychological side effects of the cancer or its treatment, these patients also suffer from the financial and social consequences of the disease. Thus, for a long-term survivor of working age, the question of a 'return to work' represents a significant problem since otherwise the financial existence of the patient, and often the family, may substantially deteriorate. Studies show that cancer patients classify financial worries with regard to the quality of life as more significant than physical or psychological side effects of the cancer or its treatment. Furthermore, there are initial studies showing that the social descent due to the disease may also prove relevant for cancer prognosis. In contrast, it was shown in studies and in a Cochrane analysis that professional assistance and support services are suitable for keeping patients in their professional lives. Therefore, both patients and physicians need to be aware of this problem.
© 2017 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Long-term survivor; MBOR; Quality of life; Return to work; Work-related medical rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29183032     DOI: 10.1159/000485079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Res Treat        ISSN: 2296-5270            Impact factor:   2.825


  7 in total

Review 1.  [Socioeconomic risks for people with cancer-possible consequences and assistance].

Authors:  Ulf Seifart
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.513

2.  Return to work following laparoscopic-assisted resection or open resection for rectal cancer: Findings from AlaCaRT-Australasian Laparoscopic Cancer of the Rectum Trial.

Authors:  Chi Kin Law; Kate Brewer; Chris Brown; Kate Wilson; Lisa Bailey; Wendy Hague; John R Simes; Andrew Stevenson; Michael Solomon; Rachael L Morton
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 4.452

3.  Rehabilitation care planning on a digital communication platform for patients with a work disability: protocol for the RehaPro-SERVE feasibility study.

Authors:  Veronika van der Wardt; Hannah Seipp; Annette Becker; Catharina Maulbecker-Armstrong; Rebecca Kraicker; Annika Schneider; Andreas Heitz; Ulf Seifart
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2021-12-21

Review 4.  [Long-term survival in cancer: definitions, concepts, and design principles of survivorship programs].

Authors:  Corinna Bergelt; Carsten Bokemeyer; Inken Hilgendorf; Thorsten Langer; Oliver Rick; Ulf Seifart; Uwe Koch-Gromus
Journal:  Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 1.513

5.  The role of general practitioners in the work guidance of cancer patients: views of general practitioners and occupational physicians.

Authors:  Marie-Christine Sarfo; Lucinda Bertels; Monique H W Frings-Dresen; Femke de Jong; Annette H Blankenstein; Kristel M van Asselt; Angela G E M de Boer
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 4.062

6.  Risk factors for return to work in colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors:  Chung-Mao Yuan; Chung-Ching Wang; Wei-Te Wu; Ching-Liang Ho; Wei-Liang Chen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.452

7.  Introduction to special section on: current topics in cancer survivorship and work.

Authors:  A G E M de Boer; M A Greidanus; C S Dewa; S F A Duijts; S J Tamminga
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.442

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.