Literature DB >> 29182521

Extraction and physicochemical characterization of chitin and chitosan isolated from house cricket.

E B Ibitoye1, I H Lokman, M N M Hezmee, Y M Goh, A B Z Zuki, A A Jimoh.   

Abstract

Chitin ranks next to cellulose as the most important bio-polysaccharide which can primarily be extracted from crustacean shells. However, the emergence of new areas of the application of chitin and its derivatives are on the increase and there is growing demand for new chitin sources. In this study, therefore, an attempt was made to extract chitin from the house cricket (Brachytrupes portentosus) by a chemical method. The physicochemical properties of chitin and chitosan extracted from crickets were compared with commercial chitin and chitosan extracted from shrimps, in terms of proximate analysis in particular, of their ash and moisture content. Also, infrared spectroscopy, x-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy and elemental analysis were conducted. The chitin and chitosan yield of the house cricket ranges over 4.3%-7.1% and 2.4%-5.8% respectively. Chitin and chitosan from crickets compares favourably with those extracted from shrimps, and were found to exhibit some similarities. The result shows that cricket and shrimp chitin and chitosan have the same degree of acetylation and degree of deacetylation of 108.1% and 80.5% respectively, following Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. The characteristic XRD strong/sharp peaks of 9.4 and 19.4° for α-chitin are common for both cricket and shrimp chitin. The percentage ash content of chitin and chitosan extracted from B. portentosus is 1%, which is lower than that obtained from shrimp products. Therefore, cricket chitin and chitosan can be said to be of better quality and of purer form than commercially produced chitin and chitosan from shrimp. Based on the quality of the product, chitin and chitosan isolated from B. portentosus can replace commercial chitin and chitosan in terms of utilization and applications. Therefore, B. portentosus is a promising alternative source of chitin and chitosan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29182521     DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/aa9dde

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1748-6041            Impact factor:   3.715


  25 in total

Review 1.  Potential of residual fungal biomass: a review.

Authors:  Federico Isaza-Pérez; Margarita Ramírez-Carmona; Leidy Rendón-Castrillón; Carlos Ocampo-López
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  The Fluorescent Effect of Withania Somnifera Chitosan Nanocomposite as an Effective Contrast Agent for Cancer Theragnostic: Experimental Study in Vitro.

Authors:  Hala S Abuelmakarem; Mahmoud A Sliem; Jala El-Azab; Mostafa Farghaly; M A Om-Hashem; Wafaa A Ahmed
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 2.217

3.  Absorption of iron from edible house crickets: a randomized crossover stable-isotope study in humans.

Authors:  Martin N Mwangi; Dennis G A B Oonincx; Marijke Hummel; Dessy A Utami; Lidyawati Gunawan; Margot Veenenbos; Christophe Zeder; Colin I Cercamondi; Michael B Zimmermann; Joop J A van Loon; Marcel Dicke; Alida Melse-Boonstra
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2022-10-06       Impact factor: 8.472

4.  Deproteinization of Chitin Extracted with the Help of Ionic Liquids.

Authors:  Douglas R Lyon; Bryan R Smith; Noureddine Abidi; Julia L Shamshina
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.927

5.  Characterization of chitin and chitosan derived from Hermetia illucens, a further step in a circular economy process.

Authors:  Micaela Triunfo; Elena Tafi; Anna Guarnieri; Rosanna Salvia; Carmen Scieuzo; Thomas Hahn; Susanne Zibek; Alessandro Gagliardini; Luca Panariello; Maria Beatrice Coltelli; Angela De Bonis; Patrizia Falabella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 6.  Seafood Waste as Attractive Source of Chitin and Chitosan Production and Their Applications.

Authors:  Vanessa P Santos; Nathália S S Marques; Patrícia C S V Maia; Marcos Antonio Barbosa de Lima; Luciana de Oliveira Franco; Galba Maria de Campos-Takaki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Extraction and Physicochemical Characterization of Chitin from Cicada orni Sloughs of the South-Eastern French Mediterranean Basin.

Authors:  Aurelia Poerio; Chloé Petit; Jean-Philippe Jehl; Elmira Arab-Tehrany; João F Mano; Franck Cleymand
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.411

Review 8.  The Potential of Insects as Alternative Sources of Chitin: An Overview on the Chemical Method of Extraction from Various Sources.

Authors:  Nurul Alyani Zainol Abidin; Faridah Kormin; Nurul Akhma Zainol Abidin; Nor Aini Fatihah Mohamed Anuar; Mohd Fadzelly Abu Bakar
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Impact of Edible Cricket Consumption on Gut Microbiota in Healthy Adults, a Double-blind, Randomized Crossover Trial.

Authors:  Valerie J Stull; Elijah Finer; Rachel S Bergmans; Hallie P Febvre; Colin Longhurst; Daniel K Manter; Jonathan A Patz; Tiffany L Weir
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Diets with and without edible cricket support a similar level of diversity in the gut microbiome of dogs.

Authors:  Jessica K Jarett; Anne Carlson; Mariana Rossoni Serao; Jessica Strickland; Laurie Serfilippi; Holly H Ganz
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-10       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.