Literature DB >> 29182211

Assessment of hypovolaemia in the critically ill.

Jan Van der Mullen, Robert Wise, Griet Vermeulen, Pieter-Jan Moonen, Manu L N G Malbrain1.   

Abstract

Assessment of the intravascular volume status of patients is one of the most challenging tasks for the intensive care clinician. It is also one of the most important skills in intensive care management as both hypervolaemia and hypovolaemia lead to increased morbidity and mortality. The assessment of hypovolaemic patients is aided by several clinical signs, laboratory investigations, and a multitude of haemodynamic monitoring systems. This review aims to outline the definitions, pathophysiology, and various assessment techniques (both old and new) employed by intensivists on the critically ill patient.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarkers; fluid responsiveness; fluids; hydration; hypovolaemia; monitoring; passive leg raising; preload; resuscitation; therapy; underfilling

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29182211     DOI: 10.5603/AIT.a2017.0077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther        ISSN: 1642-5758


  6 in total

1.  Liberal versus restrictive fluid therapy in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jonathan A Silversides; Anders Perner; Manu L N G Malbrain
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Relationship Between Initial Urine Output and Mortality in Patients Hospitalized in Cardiovascular Intensive Care Units: More Is Not Better.

Authors:  Le Li; Zhenhao Zhang; Yulong Xiong; Zhao Hu; Shangyu Liu; Bin Tu; Yan Yao
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-04-25

Review 3.  Mechanisms for hemodynamic instability related to renal replacement therapy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Adrianna Douvris; Khalid Zeid; Swapnil Hiremath; Sean M Bagshaw; Ron Wald; William Beaubien-Souligny; Jennifer Kong; Claudio Ronco; Edward G Clark
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-08-12       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  Fluids in ARDS: more pros than cons.

Authors:  Renata de S Mendes; Paolo Pelosi; Marcus J Schultz; Patricia R M Rocco; Pedro L Silva
Journal:  Intensive Care Med Exp       Date:  2020-12-18

5.  Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus statement on fundamental concepts in perioperative fluid management: fluid responsiveness and venous capacitance.

Authors:  Greg S Martin; David A Kaufman; Paul E Marik; Nathan I Shapiro; Denny Z H Levett; John Whittle; David B MacLeod; Desiree Chappell; Jonathan Lacey; Tom Woodcock; Kay Mitchell; Manu L N G Malbrain; Tom M Woodcock; Daniel Martin; Chris H E Imray; Michael W Manning; Henry Howe; Michael P W Grocott; Monty G Mythen; Tong J Gan; Timothy E Miller
Journal:  Perioper Med (Lond)       Date:  2020-04-21

6.  Clinical practice on intra-operative fluid therapy in Poland: A point prevalence study.

Authors:  Anna J Szczepańska; Michał P Pluta; Łukasz J Krzych
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.