Literature DB >> 29182154

An automated, quantitative, and case-specific evaluation of deformable image registration in computed tomography images.

R G J Kierkels1, L A den Otter, E W Korevaar, J A Langendijk, A van der Schaaf, A C Knopf, N M Sijtsema.   

Abstract

A prerequisite for adaptive dose-tracking in radiotherapy is the assessment of the deformable image registration (DIR) quality. In this work, various metrics that quantify DIR uncertainties are investigated using realistic deformation fields of 26 head and neck and 12 lung cancer patients. Metrics related to the physiologically feasibility (the Jacobian determinant, harmonic energy (HE), and octahedral shear strain (OSS)) and numerically robustness of the deformation (the inverse consistency error (ICE), transitivity error (TE), and distance discordance metric (DDM)) were investigated. The deformable registrations were performed using a B-spline transformation model. The DIR error metrics were log-transformed and correlated (Pearson) against the log-transformed ground-truth error on a voxel level. Correlations of r  ⩾  0.5 were found for the DDM and HE. Given a DIR tolerance threshold of 2.0 mm and a negative predictive value of 0.90, the DDM and HE thresholds were 0.49 mm and 0.014, respectively. In conclusion, the log-transformed DDM and HE can be used to identify voxels at risk for large DIR errors with a large negative predictive value. The HE and/or DDM can therefore be used to perform automated quality assurance of each CT-based DIR for head and neck and lung cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29182154     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9dc2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  5 in total

1.  Biomechanical modeling of neck flexion for deformable alignment of the salivary glands in head and neck cancer images.

Authors:  Molly M McCulloch; Brian M Anderson; Guillaume Cazoulat; Christine B Peterson; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Stefania Volpe; Hesham Elhalawani; Houda Bahig; Bastien Rigaud; Jason B King; Alexandra C Ford; Clifton D Fuller; Kristy K Brock
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-09-05       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Clinical use, challenges, and barriers to implementation of deformable image registration in radiotherapy - the need for guidance and QA tools.

Authors:  Mohammad Hussein; Adeyemi Akintonde; Jamie McClelland; Richard Speight; Catharine H Clark
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  MIRSIG position paper: the use of image registration and fusion algorithms in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Lowther; Rob Louwe; Johnson Yuen; Nicholas Hardcastle; Adam Yeo; Michael Jameson
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-05-06

Review 4.  Applications and limitations of machine learning in radiation oncology.

Authors:  Daniel Jarrett; Eleanor Stride; Katherine Vallis; Mark J Gooding
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 3.629

5.  Deforming to Best Practice: Key considerations for deformable image registration in radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jeffrey Barber; Johnson Yuen; Michael Jameson; Laurel Schmidt; Jonathan Sykes; Alison Gray; Nicholas Hardcastle; Callie Choong; Joel Poder; Amy Walker; Adam Yeo; Ben Archibald-Heeren; Kristie Harrison; Annette Haworth; David Thwaites
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-08-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.