Literature DB >> 29182150

Radiation protection for surgeons and anesthetists: practices and knowledge before and after training.

A Brun1, R Alcaraz Mor, M Bourrelly, G Dalivoust, G Gazazian, R Boufercha, M P Lehucher-Michel, I Sari-Minodier.   

Abstract

The use of radiological activity in the operating room (OR) and a regulatory decrease of the eye lens dose warrant an assessment of how medical staff are protected from radiation. This study aims to evaluate practices and knowledge in radiation protection (RP) for OR doctors before and after training. A descriptive study of surgeons and anesthetists in a French public hospital center was conducted in 2016. An ad hoc questionnaire concerning occupational practices and knowledge about RP was distributed before and one month after RP training. Among 103 doctors attending the training, 90 answered the questionnaire before the training. Results showed a lack of knowledge and good practice in RP. Most of the participants (86.7%) had never been trained in RP and recognized insufficient knowledge. Most of them (92.2%) wore a lead apron, 50.0% a thyroid-shield, 5.6% lead glasses, 53.3% a passive dosimeter and 17.8% an electronic dosimeter. None of them benefitted from collective protective equipment such as a ceiling suspended screen. The questionnaire following the training was completed by only 35 doctors. A comparison before and after training results showed an improvement in knowledge (scores of correct responses: 5.5/16 before and 9.5/16 after training) but not in RP good practices (scores of correct responses: 3.2/7 before and 3.3/7 after training). One training session appears to be insufficient to improve the application of the safety rules when x-rays are used. Communication needs to be improved regarding RP among anesthetists and surgeons, such as training renewal, workstation analysis in OR related to x-ray use and occupational medical follow-up. Otherwise, radiological risks in OR need to be given better consideration, such as radio-induced cataract risk. It is necessary to encourage the use of dosimeters and protective equipment and to strengthen access to lead glasses and collective protective equipment, such as ceiling suspended screens. All these recommendations ensure the received dose is reduced to as low as is reasonably achievable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29182150     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/aa9dbd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Radiol Prot        ISSN: 0952-4746            Impact factor:   1.394


  3 in total

1.  Occupational radiation exposure in doctors: an analysis of exposure rates over 25 years.

Authors:  Amy R Sharkey; Parthivi Gambhir; Sepas Saraskani; Ross Walker; Ashcaan Hajilou; Paul Bassett; Navneet Sandhu; Peter Croasdale; Ian Honey; Athanasios Diamantopoulos; Vicky Goh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Diagnostic Imaging of Pregnant Women and Fetuses: Literature Review.

Authors:  Eunhye Kim; Brenda Boyd
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-28

3.  Assessment of Health Professionals' Attitudes on Radiation Protection Measures.

Authors:  Aspasia Goula; Athanasios Chatzis; Maria-Aggeliki Stamouli; Martha Kelesi; Evridiki Kaba; Emmanouil Brilakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.