| Literature DB >> 29181387 |
Zongbo Sun1,2, Ye Ma3, Shouxing Duan1,2,4, Lei Xie1,2, Junyao Lv5, Jinzhuang Huang1,2, Zhirong Lin1,2, Ruiwei Guo1,2, Shuhua Ma1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Drug addiction is classified as a chronic relapse nature brain disease with complicated neurobiology mechanisms. There are an increasing number of researchers that are investigating the possible mechanisms for solving the thorny problem.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29181387 PMCID: PMC5664267 DOI: 10.1155/2017/1931204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Basic characteristics of rhesus monkeys.
| Parameters | Values (mean ± standard deviation) | |
|---|---|---|
| Model group ( | Normal group ( | |
| Age (years) | 5.27 ± 0.26 | 5.70 ± 0.61 |
| Weight (kg) | 7.99 ± 0.06 | 8.02 ± 0.11 |
Primer sequences and amplified fragment length.
| Project | Primer sequences | Amplified fragment length |
|---|---|---|
| GAPDH | F: 5′ GAAGAGTGGGTGTCGCTGTT 3′ | 141 bp |
| R: 5′ CTGCCGTCTGGAAAAACCT 3′ | ||
| CREB | F: 5′ GTGCCAGCCTTTCCTTACAC 3′ | 109 bp |
| R: 5′ CACAAACCCACTGATGAACG 3′ |
Weight change of rhesus macaques () (unit: kg).
| Groups | Weeks | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | |
| Normal group ( | 8.02 ± 0.11 | 8.05 ± 0.11 | 8.10 ± 0.10 | 8.14 ± 0.09 | 8.21 ± 0.11 | 8.30 ± 0.03 | 8.43 ± 0.08 | 8.50 ± 0.05 | 8.65 ± 0.04 | 8.73 ± 0.09 |
| Modeling group ( | 7.99 ± 0.06 | 8.01 ± 0.10 | 7.99 ± 0.10 | 7.95 ± 0.08 | 7.91 ± 0.08 | 7.82 ± 0.04# | 7.69 ± 0.02# | 7.44 ± 0.05# | 7.10 ± 0.05# | 6.67 ± 0.05# |
P < 0.05 versus group of normal. #P < 0.01 versus group of normal.
Figure 1The body weight of rhesus macaques in the modeling group gradually decreased, but it rose in the normal group.
Behavioral change of rhesus macaques () (unit: grade).
| Groups | Weeks | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | |
| Normal group ( | 7.92 ± 0.72 | 8.02 ± 0.71 | 8.15 ± 0.67 | 8.17 ± 0.68 | 8.23 ± 0.25 | 8.11 ± 0.09 | 7.82 ± 0.19 | 7.98 ± 0.16 | 8.31 ± 0.10 | 8.27 ± 0.43 |
| Modeling group ( | 7.55 ± 0.50 | 8.06 ± 0.20 | 8.50 ± 0.22 | 9.24 ± 0.40 | 11.71 ± 0.76# | 15.81 ± 1.51# | 22.05 ± 1.73# | 28.28 ± 3.86# | 36.13 ± 3.41# | 43.45 ± 1.35# |
# P < 0.01 versus group of normal.
Figure 2The presence of abnormal behaviors in the rhesus macaques in the modeling group increased after ephedrine administration. There were no obvious changes in the normal group.
Figure 3CREB was expressed in the cell nucleus by immunofluorescence. ((a) CREB ×200; (b) DAPI ×200; (c) CREB & DAPI ×200).
Figure 4RT-PCR analysis of CREB mRNA levels in hippocampus. Columns indicate mean ± SD, P < 0.05 versus respective control group.
Figure 5Western blotting analysis of CREB protein levels. (a) The expression of CREB in different individuals, where GAPDH was used as a loading control. (b) Densitometric analysis of Western blot with ratio of CREB/GAPDH. (c) Densitometric analysis of Western blot with CREB expression. P < 0.05 versus control group.