| Literature DB >> 29180781 |
Hui Zhao1,2, Qi-Rui Wang2, Wei Fan2, Guo-Hua Song3,4.
Abstract
It is important to understand the effects of environmental factors on secondary forest assembly for effective afforestation and vegetation restoration. We studied 24 20 m × 20 m quadrats of natural secondary forest in the southern Taihang Mountains. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) and two-way indicator hydrocarbon analysis were used to analyse the relationship between community vegetation and environmental factors. The CCA showed that 13 terrain and soil variables shared 68.17% of the total variance. The principal environmental variables, based on the most parsimonious CCA model, were (in order) elevation, soil total N, soil gravel content, slope, soil electrical conductivity, and pH. Samples were clustered into four forest types, with forest diversity affected by elevation, nutrients, and water gradients. Topographical variables affected forest assembly more than soil variables. Species diversity was evaluated using the Shannon-Wiener, Simpson's diversity, and Pielou's evenness indexes. The environmental factors that affected species distribution had different effects on species diversity. The vegetation-environment relationship in the southern region was different than the central region of the Taihang Mountains, and vegetation restoration was at an early stage. The terrain of the southern region, especially elevation and slope, should be considered for vegetation restoration and conservation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29180781 PMCID: PMC5703897 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16647-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Descriptive statistical analysis of the topography and soil data.
| Environmental variable | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Median | CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation (m) | 310 | 1252 | 815.1 | 827.5 | 34% |
| Slope (°) | 21 | 70 | 35.4 | 35.5 | 29% |
| Soil bulk density (g·cm−3) | 0.84 | 1.47 | 1.11 | 1.13 | 14% |
| Soil total porosity (% vol.) | 44.6 | 68.2 | 58.2 | 57.4 | 10% |
| Soil moisture content (% weight) | 4 | 27 | 13 | 12 | 50% |
| Soil electrical conductivity (dS·m−1) | 1.41 | 9.14 | 3.94 | 3.29 | 56% |
| Soil pH (−log(H+)) | 4.95 | 7.90 | 6.51 | 6.52 | 12% |
| Soil gravel content (>2 mm, % vol.) | 0 | 28 | 11.3 | 11.5 | 67% |
| Soil depth (cm) | 8 | 20 | 13.4 | 13.5 | 32% |
| Soil total N (% weight) | 0.21 | 1.28 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 48% |
| Soil organic C (% weight) | 1.37 | 15.00 | 5.66 | 3.93 | 71% |
Correlation analysis of the environmental variables in the southern Taihang Mountains.
| Environmental variable | Ele | Asp | Slo | SP | BD | TP | MC | EC | pH | GC | Dep | TN | OC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ele | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Asp | 0.158 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Slo | −0.131 | −0.045 | 1 | ||||||||||
| SP | −0.074 | 0.051 | 0.247 | 1 | |||||||||
| BD | −0.394 | −0.231 | −0.124 | −0.209 | 1 | ||||||||
| TP | 0.387 | 0.236 | 0.124 | 0.211 | −1.000** | 1 | |||||||
| MC | 0.257 | 0.157 | −0.289 | 0.230 | −0.577** | 0.581** | 1 | ||||||
| EC | −0.242 | −0.134 | 0.284 | 0.527** | −0.553** | 0.557** | 0.396 | 1 | |||||
| pH | −0.388 | −0.260 | 0.280 | 0.155 | −0.060 | 0.066 | 0.107 | 0.452* | 1 | ||||
| GC | 0.061 | −0.109 | 0.137 | 0.145 | 0.447* | −0.452* | −0.501* | −0.226 | −0.067 | 1 | |||
| Dep | 0.316 | −0.044 | −0.276 | 0.260 | 0.011 | −0.016 | 0.282 | −0.226 | 0.066 | 0.120 | 1 | ||
| TN | 0.564** | 0.019 | 0.052 | 0.238 | −0.636** | 0.632** | 0.434* | 0.423* | 0.020 | 0.151 | 0.046 | 1 | |
| OC | 0.416* | −0.072 | 0.082 | 0.327 | −0.659** | 0.657** | 0.504* | 0.570** | 0.146 | 0.133 | 0.018 | 0.957** | 1 |
Asp, slope aspect; Slo, slope; SP, slope position; BD, soil bulk density; TP, soil total porosity; MC, soil moisture content; EC, soil electrical conductivity; pH, soil pH (H2O); GC, soil gravel content; Dep, soil depth; TN, soil total N; OC, soil organic C; *significance at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); **significance at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 1TWINSPAN dendrogram for 24 quadrats.
Corresponding Canonical Ordination Analysis (CCA) and most parsimonious CCA (PCCA).
| Axis | CCA | Parsimonious CCA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalue | Proportion Explained | Cumulative Proportion | Eigenvalue | Proportion Explained | Cumulative Proportion | |
| CCA1 | 0.77770 | 0.11490 | 0.11490 | 0.71510 | 0.10560 | 0.10560 |
| CCA2 | 0.69920 | 0.10330 | 0.21810 | 0.64433 | 0.09517 | 0.20080 |
| CCA3 | 0.65209 | 0.09632 | 0.31446 | 0.50601 | 0.07474 | 0.27554 |
| CCA4 | 0.59446 | 0.08781 | 0.40226 | 0.47563 | 0.07025 | 0.34579 |
| CCA5 | 0.48990 | 0.07236 | 0.47462 | 0.32289 | 0.04769 | 0.39349 |
| CCA6 | 0.39209 | 0.05791 | 0.53254 | 0.21913 | 0.03237 | 0.42585 |
| Total CCA axes | 4.615 | 0.6817 | 2.883 | 0.4259 | ||
| CA1 | 0.46845 | 0.06919 | 0.06919 | 0.66099 | 0.09763 | 0.09763 |
| CA2 | 0.39377 | 0.05816 | 0.12735 | 0.57395 | 0.08477 | 0.18240 |
| CA3 | 0.35501 | 0.05244 | 0.17979 | 0.49214 | 0.07269 | 0.25509 |
| CA4 | 0.29606 | 0.04373 | 0.22352 | 0.45298 | 0.06691 | 0.32200 |
| CA5 | 0.25032 | 0.03697 | 0.26049 | 0.38699 | 0.05716 | 0.37916 |
| CA6 | 0.12485 | 0.01844 | 0.27893 | 0.32687 | 0.04828 | 0.42744 |
| Total CA axes | 2.155 | 0.3183 | 3.887 | 0.5741 | ||
CCA1–CCA6, the constrained axes 1–6 of CCA and PCCA; CA1–CA6, the unconstrained axes 1–6 of CCA and PCCA.
Permutation test for the environmental variables of parsimonious CCA.
| Environmental variable | Chi square | F value | Pr(>F) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 0.6531 | 2.8561 | 0.001*** |
| Soil total N | 0.5248 | 2.2951 | 0.001*** |
| Soil gravel content | 0.4535 | 1.9832 | 0.001*** |
| Slope | 0.4993 | 2.1838 | 0.004** |
| Soil electric conductivity | 0.4001 | 1.7500 | 0.033* |
| Soil pH | 0.3524 | 1.5410 | 0.062. |
***Significance at the 0.001 level; **significance at the 0.01 level; *significance at the 0.05 level; .Correlation significance at the 0.1 level.
Figure 2Corresponding Canonical Ordination Analysis (CCA) and Parsimonious CCA ordination plots with TWINSPAN result. (a) CCA triplot. (b) Parsimonious CCA biplot with four forest types. (c) CCA triplot. (d) Parsimonious CCA biplot with four forest types 2. The bottom and left-hand scales represent the quadrats and species, respectively. The top and right-hand scales represent the environmental variables. s1–s31 indicate tree species codes (see Supplementary Table S2); 1–24 indicate 24 quadrats. The blue, arrowed lines indicate environmental variables. Ele, elevation; Asp, aspect; Slo, slope; SP, slope position; BD, soil bulk density; TP, soil total porosity; MC, soil moisture content; EC, soil electrical conductivity; GC, soil gravel content; Dep, soil depth; TN, soil total N; OC, soil organic C.
Figure 3The abundance (a1–a3), Shannon (b1–b3), Simpson (c1–c3), and Pielou (c1–c3) indexes of 24 quadrats on the elevation, soil total N, and soil gravel percent.