| Literature DB >> 29180781 |
Hui Zhao1,2, Qi-Rui Wang2, Wei Fan2, Guo-Hua Song3,4.
Abstract
It is important to understand the effects of environmental factors on secondary forest assembly for effective afforestation and vegetation restoration. We studied 24 20 m × 20 m quadrats of natural secondary forest in the southern Taihang Mountains. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) and two-way indicatorEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29180781 PMCID: PMC5703897 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16647-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Descriptive statistical analysis of the topography and soil data.
| Environmental variable | Minimum | Maximum | Mean | Median | CV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation (m) | 310 | 1252 | 815.1 | 827.5 | 34% |
| Slope (°) | 21 | 70 | 35.4 | 35.5 | 29% |
| Soil bulk density (g·cm−3) | 0.84 | 1.47 | 1.11 | 1.13 | 14% |
| Soil total porosity (% vol.) | 44.6 | 68.2 | 58.2 | 57.4 | 10% |
| Soil moisture content (% weight) | 4 | 27 | 13 | 12 | 50% |
| Soil electrical conductivity (dS·m−1) | 1.41 | 9.14 | 3.94 | 3.29 | 56% |
| Soil pH (−log(H+)) | 4.95 | 7.90 | 6.51 | 6.52 | 12% |
| Soil gravel content (>2 mm, % vol.) | 0 | 28 | 11.3 | 11.5 | 67% |
| Soil depth (cm) | 8 | 20 | 13.4 | 13.5 | 32% |
| Soil total N (% weight) | 0.21 | 1.28 | 0.61 | 0.55 | 48% |
| Soil organic C (% weight) | 1.37 | 15.00 | 5.66 | 3.93 | 71% |
Correlation analysis of the environmental variables in the southern Taihang Mountains.
| Environmental variable | Ele | Asp | Slo | SP | BD | TP | MC | EC | pH | GC | Dep | TN | OC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ele | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Asp | 0.158 | 1 | |||||||||||
| Slo | −0.131 | −0.045 | 1 | ||||||||||
| SP | −0.074 | 0.051 | 0.247 | 1 | |||||||||
| BD | −0.394 | −0.231 | −0.124 | −0.209 | 1 | ||||||||
| TP | 0.387 | 0.236 | 0.124 | 0.211 | −1.000** | 1 | |||||||
| MC | 0.257 | 0.157 | −0.289 | 0.230 | −0.577** | 0.581** | 1 | ||||||
| EC | −0.242 | −0.134 | 0.284 | 0.527** | −0.553** | 0.557** | 0.396 | 1 | |||||
| pH | −0.388 | −0.260 | 0.280 | 0.155 | −0.060 | 0.066 | 0.107 | 0.452* | 1 | ||||
| GC | 0.061 | −0.109 | 0.137 | 0.145 | 0.447* | −0.452* | −0.501* | −0.226 | −0.067 | 1 | |||
| Dep | 0.316 | −0.044 | −0.276 | 0.260 | 0.011 | −0.016 | 0.282 | −0.226 | 0.066 | 0.120 | 1 | ||
| TN | 0.564** | 0.019 | 0.052 | 0.238 | −0.636** | 0.632** | 0.434* | 0.423* | 0.020 | 0.151 | 0.046 | 1 | |
| OC | 0.416* | −0.072 | 0.082 | 0.327 | −0.659** | 0.657** | 0.504* | 0.570** | 0.146 | 0.133 | 0.018 | 0.957** | 1 |
Asp, slope aspect; Slo, slope; SP, slope position; BD, soil bulk density; TP, soil total porosity; MC, soil moisture content; EC, soil electrical conductivity; pH, soil pH (H2O); GC, soil gravel content; Dep, soil depth; TN, soil total N; OC, soil organic C; *significance at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); **significance at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
Figure 1TWINSPAN dendrogram for 24 quadrats.
Corresponding Canonical Ordination Analysis (CCA) and most parsimonious CCA (PCCA).
| Axis | CCA | Parsimonious CCA | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eigenvalue | Proportion Explained | Cumulative Proportion | Eigenvalue | Proportion Explained | Cumulative Proportion | |
| CCA1 | 0.77770 | 0.11490 | 0.11490 | 0.71510 | 0.10560 | 0.10560 |
| CCA2 | 0.69920 | 0.10330 | 0.21810 | 0.64433 | 0.09517 | 0.20080 |
| CCA3 | 0.65209 | 0.09632 | 0.31446 | 0.50601 | 0.07474 | 0.27554 |
| CCA4 | 0.59446 | 0.08781 | 0.40226 | 0.47563 | 0.07025 | 0.34579 |
| CCA5 | 0.48990 | 0.07236 | 0.47462 | 0.32289 | 0.04769 | 0.39349 |
| CCA6 | 0.39209 | 0.05791 | 0.53254 | 0.21913 | 0.03237 | 0.42585 |
| Total CCA axes | 4.615 | 0.6817 | 2.883 | 0.4259 | ||
| CA1 | 0.46845 | 0.06919 | 0.06919 | 0.66099 | 0.09763 | 0.09763 |
| CA2 | 0.39377 | 0.05816 | 0.12735 | 0.57395 | 0.08477 | 0.18240 |
| CA3 | 0.35501 | 0.05244 | 0.17979 | 0.49214 | 0.07269 | 0.25509 |
| CA4 | 0.29606 | 0.04373 | 0.22352 | 0.45298 | 0.06691 | 0.32200 |
| CA5 | 0.25032 | 0.03697 | 0.26049 | 0.38699 | 0.05716 | 0.37916 |
| CA6 | 0.12485 | 0.01844 | 0.27893 | 0.32687 | 0.04828 | 0.42744 |
| Total CA axes | 2.155 | 0.3183 | 3.887 | 0.5741 | ||
CCA1–CCA6, the constrained axes 1–6 of CCA and PCCA; CA1–CA6, the unconstrained axes 1–6 of CCA and PCCA.
Permutation test for the environmental variables of parsimonious CCA.
| Environmental variable | Chi square | F value | Pr(>F) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 0.6531 | 2.8561 | 0.001*** |
| Soil total N | 0.5248 | 2.2951 | 0.001*** |
| Soil gravel content | 0.4535 | 1.9832 | 0.001*** |
| Slope | 0.4993 | 2.1838 | 0.004** |
| Soil electric conductivity | 0.4001 | 1.7500 | 0.033* |
| Soil pH | 0.3524 | 1.5410 | 0.062. |
***Significance at the 0.001 level; **significance at the 0.01 level; *significance at the 0.05 level; .Correlation significance at the 0.1 level.
Figure 2Corresponding Canonical Ordination Analysis (CCA) and Parsimonious CCA ordination plots with TWINSPAN result. (a) CCA triplot. (b) Parsimonious CCA biplot with four forest types. (c) CCA triplot. (d) Parsimonious CCA biplot with four forest types 2. The bottom and left-hand scales represent the quadrats and species, respectively. The top and right-hand scales represent the environmental variables. s1–s31 indicate tree species codes (see Supplementary Table S2); 1–24 indicate 24 quadrats. The blue, arrowed lines indicate environmental variables. Ele, elevation; Asp, aspect; Slo, slope; SP, slope position; BD, soil bulk density; TP, soil total porosity; MC, soil moisture content; EC, soil electrical conductivity; GC, soil gravel content; Dep, soil depth; TN, soil total N; OC, soil organic C.
Figure 3The abundance (a1–a3), Shannon (b1–b3), Simpson (c1–c3), and Pielou (c1–c3) indexes of 24 quadrats on the elevation, soil total N, and soil gravel percent.