| Literature DB >> 29180694 |
Christopher J Traverse1, Margaret Young1, John Suddard-Bangsund1, Tyler Patrick1, Matthew Bates1, Pei Chen1, Brian Wingate2, Sophia Y Lunt1,3, Annick Anctil4, Richard R Lunt5,6.
Abstract
Organic molecular salts are an emerging and highly tunable class of materials for organic and transparent photovoltaics. In this work, we demonstrate novel phenyl borate and carborane-based anions paired with a near-infrared (NIR)-selective heptamethine cation. We further explore the effects of anion structures and functional groups on both device performance and physical properties. Changing the functional groups on the anion significantly alters the open circuit voltage and yields a clear dependence on electron withdrawing groups. Anion exchange is also shown to selectively alter the solubility and film surface energy of the resulting molecular salt, enabling the potential fabrication of solution-deposited cascade or multi-junction devices from orthogonal solvents. This study further expands the catalog and properties of organic salts for inexpensive, and stable NIR-selective molecular salt photovoltaics.Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29180694 PMCID: PMC5703893 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-16539-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Molecular structures and experimental device architecture (a) Chemical structure of the Cy+ heptamethine cation. (b) Chemical structures for tetraphenylborate (1) tetrakis(4-fluorophenyl)borate (FPhB−) (2), tetrakis(4-chlorophenyl)borate (ClPhB−) (3), tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate (TFM−) (4), tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)borate (TPFB−) (5), CB11H12 (CBH−) (6), C4B18Co (CoCB−) (7), and B12F12 (FCB2−) (8) anions. (c) Illustration of the photovoltaic device stack utilized in this study.
Figure 2Photovoltaic device data. (a) Current density-voltage (J-V) and (b) external quantum efficiency (EQE) characteristics for best devices. Symbols and lines in (b) correspond to measured and fitted EQE data respectively, the latter of which was generated when fitting spectra for exciton diffusion lengths shown in Table 1.
Device performance parameters.
| Donor (Thickness) | Jsc (mA/cm2) | Voc(V) | FF | PCE(%) | NIR EQE (%) | EDL(nm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CyTPFB (12 nm) | 5.6 ± 0.6 | 0.66 ± 0.03 | 0.57 ± 0.04 | 2.1 ± 0.1 | 21.7 | 4.3 ± 0.3 |
| CyClPhB (13 nm) | 3.5 ± 0.3 | 0.59 ± 0.05 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 0.59 ± 0.06 | 10.5 | 2.6 ± 0.2 |
| CyFPhB (18 nm) | 2.1 ± 0.2 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.27 ± 0.03 | 14.9 | 3.4 ± 0.1 |
| CyTFM (25 nm) | 5.9 ± 0.6 | 0.69 ± 0.04 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 1.7 ± 0.2 | 20.7 | 7.5 ± 0.4 |
| CyPhB (12 nm) | 0.65 ± 0.06 | 0.02 ± 0.01 | 0.25 ± 0.01 | 0 | 0 | — |
| CyCBH (9 nm) | 5.7 ± 0.3 | 0.42 ± 0.01 | 0.56 ± 0.03 | 1.3 ± 0.1 | 20.4 | 3.6 ± 0.3 |
| CyCoCB (8.5 nm) | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 0.45 ± 0.01 | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 14.3 | 2.5 ± 0.2 |
| Cy2FCB (2 nm) | 3.0 ± 0.2 | 0.27 ± 0.01 | 0.53 ± 0.01 | 0.42 ± 0.04 | 4.4 | 1.0 ± 0.1 |
Average performance parameters for optimum donor thicknesses, donor (near-infrared) external quantum efficiency (EQE) peak values, and exciton diffusion lengths (EDLs) calculated from EQE data in Fig. 2.
Figure 3Performance thickness dependence. Thickness dependent performance data for salt devices with (a) phenyl borate and (b) carborane anions. The symbols and colors correspond to the anions in Fig. 2.
Figure 4Anion band bending. Schematic donor-acceptor (D-A) band structures illustrating changes in interface gap (IG) as a function of donor thickness (tD). Anions given in (a) yield increasing IG with increasing thicknesses while Cy2FCB yields the opposite trend illustrated in (b).
Surface energy and solubility data.
| Salt | Water Angle (Degrees) | DIM Angle (Degrees) | Surface Energy (mN/m) | Solubility in CB (mg/mL) | Solubility in DMF (mg/mL) | Solubility in Water (mg/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CyTPFB | 99.8 ± 0.4 | 52 ± 4 | 38 ± 3 | 2.4 | 10 | 7 × 10–5 |
| CyClPhB | 76 ± 3 | 8.7 ± 0.6 | 52 ± 4 | 7.7 | 10 | 3 × 10–5 |
| CyFPhB | 72.9 ± 0.5 | 6 ± 1 | 51 ± 9 | 21 | 10 | 2 × 10–5 |
| CyTFM | 58 ± 7 | 50 ± 4 | 43 ± 5 | 19 | 10 | 1 × 10–4 |
| CyPhB | 77 ± 3 | 8 ± 2 | 50 ± 10 | 0.45 | 6.3 | 2 × 10–5 |
| CyCBH | 70 ± 2 | 7.2 ± 0.7 | 51 ± 5 | 0.28 | 10 | 2 × 10–5 |
| CyCoCB | 80 ± 1 | 13 ± 2 | 53 ± 8 | 0.27 | 10 | 2 × 10–5 |
| Cy2FCB | 76.3 ± 0.4 | 24.6 ± 0.4 | 47 ± 0.8 | 0.023 | 10 | 4 × 10–5 |
| CyI | 71 ± 2 | 0 | 55 ± 5 | 1 | 12 | 7 × 10–5 |
| CyPF6 | 75 ± 4 | 25 ± 2 | 47 ± 3 | 2 | 9 | 5 × 10–5 |
Water and diiodomethane (DIM) contact angles, surface energies, and solubilities in chlorobenzene (CB), dimethylformamide (DMF), and water measured for salt films utilizing selected anions from ref.[2] and the phenyl borate and carborane anions from this study.
Figure 5Tuning hydrophobicity. Photographs of water droplets on 50 nm films of (a) CyTPFB, (b) CyCoCB, (c) CyCBH, and (d) CyTFM (shown in order of decreasing contact angle) illustrate the ability to tune the hydrophobicity of the salt via anion exchange.